Verified Reviews - Aerospace Science and Technology
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

COSMOS 2022-08-25

What's the situation recently? The manuscript has been submitted to the journal for many days now.

Mr.mystery 2022-08-21

May I ask how long it takes for you to receive the first-instance verdict?

蒲公英2垂柳呀 2022-08-13

The first-instance result has been announced, please make modifications.

michaelgaoy 2022-08-10

Excuse me, do you have any results?

AndrewKuo 2022-08-04

The text "submitted to journal, 3rd Aug, 2022 with editor, 4th Aug, 2022" is already in English.

蒲公英2垂柳呀 2022-07-15

2022.3.27 submitted
2022.3.29 under review
2022.5.18 status time updated, under review
2022.5.20 required reviews completed
2022.5.30 under review
2022.6.4 required reviews completed
2022.6.30 status time updated, required reviews completed
Until now (7.15), still required reviews completed.

James_CT 2022-07-09

The first rejection was received within one month, even before undergoing review. After resubmission, the current status of the manuscript is as follows:
Current status: Submitted to Journal - April 4th, 2022
With Editor - April 5th, 2022
Under Review - May 15th, 2022
Completed - Reject - July 8th, 2022

Currently, the review process of the journal is slow, and there are many reviewers. While five reviewers agreed to review the manuscript, one reviewer found the innovation lacking, while the remaining four provided positive feedback. The Associate Editor (AE) rejected the manuscript directly.

This is likely due to the large volume of submissions, as the journal is currently ranked second globally in the aerospace field. Hence, it is crucial to have strong innovation in submissions. Furthermore, the number of invited reviewers has also increased compared to last year, with 5-7 reviewers this year, compared to 2-4 reviewers in the previous year.

迷途中的小博 2022-06-30

Recently, the speed of manuscript review and editorial processing has been relatively slow. However, the good news is that the newly published self-citation rate has finally decreased, and the impact factor has slightly increased. Currently, the overall quality of journal papers and submissions is still better than CJA. Domestic journals still need to work harder.

James_CT 2022-06-14

May I ask how your results are? This journal is really making people anxious. It has been over three months since the second review and still no results. Waiting anxiously, checking it every day, it seems like not many people have received their results.

weizc_9527 2022-06-02

May I ask what is the result of your one-month review?

weizc_9527 2022-05-30

May I ask what is your manuscript number?

星光辰 2022-05-29

I am very afraid that this journal will be alerted. The self-citation rate is over 40%. I have had one article accepted before, it was not difficult to get accepted. But now my supervisor does not allow me to submit anymore, as they are afraid of being on the watchlist. Currently, the reputation in the industry is not good, despite being in the first tier of Chinese Academy of Sciences journals. However, it is not as good as AIAA.

James_CT 2022-05-26

How do you all push for it? Push the editor, deputy editor, or editor-in-chief?

慕言qAq 2022-05-25

It has been three months, I don't know how much longer it will take.

CaoTeng 2022-05-25

Last year, this journal was very fast, but this year it's so slow, so slow. After submitting, it has been more than 50 days and the status with the editor has not changed. Judging from the manuscript number, the number of submissions is too high.

CaoTeng 2022-05-25

This journal is now too slow. It has been 50 days and it has not changed since it became "with editor" on the second day. I sent an internal email, but only received an official reply saying they will expedite it...

zcwxzc 2022-05-20

This journal is really slow, it has been a month since I submitted my manuscript, and there has been no response at all. I sincerely feel that if the editor cannot handle this job, they should give it to someone who can, instead of occupying the position without doing anything.

暮夜 2022-05-06

The editing efficiency is good, and the revised work can be submitted for review within a week.

暮夜 2022-05-06

Two reviewers, two major revisions, one minor revision.
Submission history:
2021-10-29 manuscript submitted
2021-12-11 major revision
2022-01-09 manuscript_R1 submitted
2022-02-12 major revision
2022-03-11 manuscript_R2 submitted
2022-04-18 minor revision
2022-04-22 manuscript_R3 submitted
2022-04-25 accepted

guozhengtao 2022-04-19

This journal is very good and fast.

贺伯言 2022-04-11

It has been over two weeks already, hasn't the editor looked at the required reviews yet?

追寻123 2022-03-31

Control of aerial refueling.

AcceptAccept 2022-03-31

Brother, can't find a reviewer in what field?

追寻123 2022-03-31

Suggestion: Remind every month.

追寻123 2022-03-31

First instance rejected after 11 months, reason being unable to find a reviewer!!!

于小七 2022-03-30

Four months after submission, anxiously waiting, hoping to be chosen!

Crey 2022-03-29

I directly emailed the editor-in-chief, and they quickly replied.

追寻123 2022-03-23

The first trial has not yet ended, it will soon be 11 months!!!

leo94 2022-03-14

Oh, it has been 3 months since the review process.

科学打工人 2022-02-15

I have been urging continuously since 3 months later, insisting on urging once every month.

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now