雨落凡尘 2021-04-12

Posted at the beginning of February, it took half a month for the paper to go under review. In early April, a rejection was received. There was only one reviewer who provided over ten comments, mainly questioning the data and methods used. No specific questions were raised regarding the article's idea, introduction, and discussion, as the confusion was solely focused on the model formula and data.

In total, three papers have been submitted to Forest Ecology and Management. One has been accepted, one is currently undergoing major revisions, and one has been rejected. Generally, it takes 1-2 months for the review process with two reviewers. Overall, it seems difficult to find reviewers for macro-geography and ecology studies. The reviewers for these three papers were not from the same field, and some were more inclined towards experimental studies, resulting in doubts about the model methods.

菜根 2021-03-12

The following text translates to English as: "Submitted in January 2021, received reviewer comments in March. Both reviewers provided minor revisions, took half a day to make the modifications, sent it back, and received acceptance the next day."

你这还不傻 2021-02-25

The overall requirements are quite high, especially for the clarity of statistical methods and results. The discussion section also has high requirements, and the experimental content should be substantial. Thank you to the editor for giving me the opportunity to make revisions.