Verified Reviews - ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

docados 2021-08-09

May I ask how you know whether the reviewers have given major revisions or minor revisions? I have only received their comments and cannot see their conclusions.

五彩缤纷花裤衩 2021-08-08

In the field of environmental economics, it was submitted in early April, underwent major revisions in mid-May, took about 40 days to make personal changes, and was submitted in mid-June. It was accepted in mid to late July.

daer123 2021-08-07

2.22 submitted
2.23 with editor
3.3 editor invited
3.4 under review
3.7 under review
3.10 under review
3.13 under review
3.18 required reviews completed
4.15 major revision
5.13 submitted
5.16 under review
6.5 major revision
6.28 submitted
7.25 minor revision
7.28 submitted
8.7 accepted
Sent to four reviewers, 2 minor revisions, 1 major revision, 1 rejection. The editor requested a major revision, which was done twice because the second time it was sent to a reviewer who tended to reject. This reviewer requested a major revision and raised many questions, making the process of answering difficult. Fortunately, the outcome was good, as the article indeed had some issues that were clarified in the revisions. Thanks to the reviewers and the editor for their efforts.

蛋蛋蛋嗝 2021-08-04

Did you submit it for review? I am planning to invest, but I am feeling a bit anxious when I see it.

Wu-jay 2021-08-04

My also did not undergo review.

Wu-jay 2021-08-03

There has been no progress since July 16th when it entered "with editor".

Vincent 2021-08-03

8-3 online is still very fast.

Vincent 2021-08-03

Please try not to rush, it is normal for a reply to take around ten days to two weeks.

yuanhuazzl 2021-08-03

First submission on May 30th, returned for formatting revisions. Resubmitted on June 1st. Sent for external review around June 15th, minor revisions on July 13th, and revised again on July 22nd. However, from July 23rd until now, it has remained "with editor." Can I send an email to urge the process? Which email should I contact for this purpose?

斐波那契的兔几 2021-08-02

4.30 Submit under review, then revised once, took about 20 days for the modifications, still under review.
7.13 Accept
7.29 Proof
7.30 Online
8.1 Sent an email to inform about being online.
After the acceptance, the process speeds up quickly.

2021-08-01

July 21st major renovation.

Vincent 2021-08-01

8-1 The copyright transfer was scheduled for 9 o'clock, and the proof was sent at 11 o'clock. However, it is not convenient to modify the proof system, and I do not know how to handle the red references. They also did not inform me of a solution. Sigh, I hope everything goes smoothly.

Vincent 2021-08-01

When transferring copyright, one can see the DOI number of their own article.

Vincent 2021-08-01

8-1 Copyright transfer This step is to choose whether OA is next. The following is waiting for the proof email.

茉芷 2021-07-31

Posted on June 11th.
Reviewed on July 5th.
Rejected on July 30th.

Vincent 2021-07-29

Hello, line numbers are automatically numbered from the title. It is recommended to use Office Word. The submission period can be found in my reply below. It is very detailed.

听风哈哈哈 2021-07-28

May I ask how long it takes to receive a response for the revised manuscript?

va12 2021-07-28

Hello, may I ask how you label the line numbers in your thesis? Do you start from the abstract and continue numbering consecutively until the reference list?

Vincent 2021-07-28

You replied incorrectly, please refer to the previous message above!

Vincent 2021-07-27

Translate the following text into English: 7-27 Received. Just found out that another reviewer has been added, but we are all satisfied with the modifications we made. Thanks to the three reviewers and Dr. Eyup, the editor. Wishing espr the best of luck and success!

Vincent 2021-07-27

7-27 received. Just discovered that another reviewer has been added, but we are all satisfied with the modifications. Thank you to the three reviewers and Dr. Eyup, the editor. Wishing ESPR continuous improvement!

guigui6001 2021-07-26

2021.06.30 submit
2021.07.21 editor invited
2021.07.24 with editor
2021.07.25 under review

Submitted multiple times and rejected, hoping for good news this time... Fingers crossed.

richhhhh 2021-07-26

I have urged for editing once, but it still hasn't been submitted for review. Helplessly, I can only request for withdrawal of the manuscript.

Vincent 2021-07-26

7-25 required reviews completed
I don't know why it was updated once.

Vincent 2021-07-23

7-22 Required Reviews Completed
The comments were returned within three days after the external audit. I was a bit surprised, hoping it is a good outcome.

江白 2021-07-22

3-15 Submission
Around 1 month for external review
7-9 Major revisions
7-20 Revised
7-21 Accepted

朴美丽 2021-07-22

I have also submitted my manuscript for a month, and it is still with the editor.

Vincent 2021-07-21

7-20 Under review.

Mr. Zhang 2021-07-21

May I ask how your editor invited handled it?

Mr. Zhang 2021-07-21

It has been almost a month since the submission. It has always been "with editor", but now it has changed to "Editor Invited". May I ask, what does this mean? Are there any similar experiences from others?

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started