levanalw 2023-03-16

No, still with editor.

czxbkjn m 2023-03-16

Excuse me, has it been submitted for review now?

czxbkjn m 2023-03-16

How long have you been with the editor before becoming invited?

MOF材料 2023-03-16

I'm the same. May I ask how are you now?

MOF材料 2023-03-16

Why did my status change from "invited" back to "with editor"?

srsy 2023-03-15

It has already been the 15th day of RRC.

luyuan1994 2023-03-14

The first article has been waiting for almost a month for a second review, but there is no news at all. The second article was submitted on the 7th of last month, got "with editor" status on February 10th, received an invitation from the editor on March 6th, and has been "with editor" again since the 9th. I'm really anxious!!!

海阔 2023-03-13

Why did my status change from RRC to UR?

zhangmengnan 2023-03-11

How long after accepting will the proof be provided?

伪装-小白 2023-03-10

Last month, I reviewed ESPR. At that time, there was already one reviewer who had submitted comments in the system. After I submitted my comments, the system status changed to "require reviewer complete". Until now, the third reviewer has not submitted any comments, so the status has not changed. This only indicates that two reviewers' comments have returned.

ddcd 2023-03-10

It's been almost a month since RRC arrived at Major.

ddcd 2023-03-10

Is this the first round of submission? Actually, it's normal to wait for a month. You can shift your focus to other work, otherwise you will always feel anxious and nervous. Mindset is very important.

负雪 2023-03-10

Can wait for a few more days. Previously, I had to wait for half a month before getting major repairs for RRC.

轩轩轩轩轩 2023-03-10

Normal, my ten days.

轩轩轩轩轩 2023-03-10

Guessing, did you use columns in the article?

srsy 2023-03-09

May I ask if you have submitted it for external review or if you have been working with the editor all along?

xk65 2023-03-09

Two months later, with the editor's review, it is informed that the manuscript is not addressing environmental issues. Please carefully consider before submitting your paper to avoid wasting time.
Please be aware that ESPR is facing high publication pressure, and around 70% of the manuscripts we receive are rejected.

srsy 2023-03-08

How long has your RRC lasted?

levanalw 2023-03-08

3.8 con editor translates to "3.8 with editor" in English.

srsy 2023-03-08

It has been the ninth day of the RRC, I don't know if I should write a reminder letter.

levanalw 2023-03-07

This is too long...

levanalw 2023-03-07

How long has the status of "editor invited" been?

7733 2023-03-07

It has been one month since the submission, and it is still in the "editor invited" status. Should I send an email to remind them?

levanalw 2023-03-07

3.6 editor invited, couldn't hold back and sent a reminder letter, after 23 days the situation finally changed.

Lotus_lu 2023-03-07

Is it just my bad luck... so slow.
Submitted on 1.06
Returned for format modification on 1.09
With editor on 1.11
Under review on 2.11
Still under review on 3.04
...so slow, I hope for a good outcome... I want to graduate.

Lotus_lu 2023-03-07

It took me a month to submit for review with the editor...

Miraclep 2023-03-06

Hello, may I ask if it was mentioned when you submitted your manuscript? "Make sure that your main manuscript text is in portrait style." What does this mean?

Miraclep 2023-03-06

Hello, may I ask if you mentioned "Please indicate the corresponding authors affiliation/institution in metadata" when submitting your manuscript? I wrote it on the first page, but it was returned three times. Have you encountered this situation before?

H0 2023-03-06

I have been accepted for two articles, both from this journal. It's too slow, too slow!!!!!! I had to spend money to publish them in Chinese in order to graduate.

zhangmengnan 2023-03-04

Translated text: Initially submitted in early January, the format was changed three times in between.
Major revisions were made on February 6th, primarily addressing format issues and a problem with the added standard recovery rate range.
Returned for further revisions on February 23rd.
Minor revisions were made on March 3rd, where one reviewer agreed to accept it while another disagreed with the interpretation of the added standard recovery rate range.
I'm wondering if I should make the changes according to the reviewer's suggestions, and if there is a risk of rejection. This is really tormenting.