felix### 2023-02-23

2022-10-19 Submission
2022-12-09 Major revision, three reviewers, 40 questions
2023-01-14 Major revision resubmission
2023-02-07 Minor revision, the third reviewer had two small questions, returned on the same day
2023-02-22 Acceptance (all 2s)
The reviewing process took four months, neither fast nor slow. The reviewers were very professional. Thank you, ES.

xxxt 2023-02-18

2023.2.16 submitted
2023.2.18 with editor

LS仗剑走天涯 2023-02-15

After the major revision, one is accepted and one needs to solve a key problem. After the revision, both reviewers have returned their comments. Now, more than a week has passed since the required reviews were completed, and the editor has not made a decision yet. How long will this state continue? Does anyone know?

Steven008 2023-02-08

First Article
Submitted on April 19, 2021
Major revisions on October 25, 2021
Revised on February 6, 2021
Accepted on March 11, 2022

Second Article
Submitted on July 3, 2022
Minor revisions on September 3, 2022
Revised on November 19, 2022
Minor revisions on December 15, 2022
Revised on January 11, 2023
Accepted on February 1, 2023

The processing speed of the manuscript is relatively fast, and the reviewers' comments are fair. With careful revision, it can be accepted!

itskkk 2023-02-08

I have been rejected after two months of submission.
The review speed is acceptable.
They said there is a lack of innovation.

marlonli 2023-01-26

Is this journal a top journal in the field of structural/bridge engineering? I wonder where this can be ranked among other experts.

做一只努力的小废物 2023-01-13

Undergraduate students participate in entrepreneurship competitions and showcase their talents.

itskkk 2023-01-09

Undergraduate students, for the first time, our research group submitted three papers to SCI journals but they were all rejected. We will try submitting to a better journal this time, and if that doesn't work, we will submit to a slightly lower-tier journal. The path of scientific research is full of obstacles and is long.
2023.1.1 Manuscript submitted
2023.1.5 Under review.

Acc123 2023-01-09

Excuse me, I thought I hadn't written my own review process before, but I just saw that I already reviewed it on the 81st floor. The deadline for submission is on the 22nd, and I made a mistake here, but I can't find a place to delete the comment. I apologize if anyone was misled!

Acc123 2023-01-09

2022.04.23 Submission
2022.09.25 Major repair
2022.11.24 Acceptance

IEM_XD 2023-01-04

Posted on November 2nd, 22
Returned with revision suggestions on December 17th, minor revisions
Submitted revised manuscript on December 24th
Accepted on January 4th
All three articles previously submitted were rejected, but this one was accepted by another journal. I highly regard ES and am somewhat hesitant to submit to it. The journal is highly respected in the industry. I will continue to work hard. Well done!

solidwork 2023-01-03

Record the timeline:
2022.11.15 Submitted to Journal
2022.11.22 With editor
2022.11.22 Under review
2022.12.23 Required Reviews Complete
2023.01.08 Revise
2023.01.31 Under review
2023.03.01 Revise
2023.03.05 Under review
2023.03.26 Revise
2023.03.29 Accept

Acc123 2022-12-06

4.23 Submission
7.28 Review completed
9.25 Major revision
11.22 Acceptance
12.02 Online publication

看星星的云 2022-11-28

6.6 Submission successful
6.12 Under review, sent for 3 external reviews
9.12 Review completed
10.10 Resubmit
10.13 Under review for second round of reviews
11.8 Review completed
11.10 Resubmit
11.27 Review completed
Accepted on the same day
Total duration was less than 6 months

想发SCI的小可怜 2022-11-22

First trial takes two months, reply takes one month, hoping for a good outcome.

想发SCI的小可怜 2022-11-22

So annoying, after the first revision, it's under review again.

Zc580bbk 2022-10-30

The editor is very professional and efficient. The submission, first-round revisions, and second-round revisions are all processed and submitted for review within 3-5 days. The submission was made at the end of May, and the first-round review was received in early August. There were three reviewers, and we must thank the editor for their reasonable selection of reviewers who understand the field. One of the reviewers was very diligent and responsible, providing nearly 30 suggestions that greatly improved the quality of the manuscript. The revisions took almost a month and a half, but the second-round review came back quickly, within 20 days. Only one reviewer's feedback remained. The final revisions were completed and submitted by the end of October. The second-round review directly accepted the manuscript. The whole process took 5 months.

哈哈哈哈哈 2022-10-25

Garbage journals, if they are not sent for review, why do they need to belittle others' research and say it does not meet your standards? They feel so superior, don't they? ??

像个战神一样 2022-10-23

Due to the first reviewer's inability to handle the manuscript, the second editor found two new reviewers.
10.19 Rrc
10.19 Accepted
The editor's processing speed is very fast.

xjxjxjxj 2022-10-22

Were you rejected? I also submitted my application 5 days ago, and now it's "Decision in Process".

handong123 2022-10-19

Experienced a battle with the reviewers for 11 months.
Went through 5 rounds of review.
Finally accepted for publication.

envyzzz 2022-10-11

6.20 Submission
8.29 Revision
8.31 Rework
10.10 Acceptance

The review process was quite fast. I submitted on 6.24 and by 7.24 it was already "decision in process". However, the editor took until 8.29 to return it to me, and it only had a few minor issues. I made the changes and sent it back within two days, and on 10.10 I received acceptance. Overall, it went smoothly. The reviewers were quick, but the editor's handling speed was slow.

像个战神一样 2022-10-10

Brother, may I ask how many reviewers there are for the first review and how many reviewers there are for the second review?

Geery 2022-09-22

Finally, after over 10 months, I was finally hired. It was not easy at all.

nickname 2022-09-19

Why is the decision process taking so long? It has been a week since I submitted my article, but I still haven't received any results.

xxxt 2022-09-17

September 17, 2022. I estimate that it will be a direct rejection.

Keviiiiin-8 2022-09-15

22.9.2 submit;
22.9.15 under review...

I am quite satisfied with this speed. Good luck with the hydrological testing of the shake table.

xxxt 2022-09-14

2022.9.11 avec éditeur translates to "2022.9.11 with editor" in English.

iscca2 2022-09-08

Quite a pit, wasted nine months.
Submitted on December 26, 2021.
Major revision in April 2022.
Submitted again in May after modifications.
Changed the first reviewer.
Major revision in July 2022.
Rejected on August 15, 2022.

xxxt 2022-09-08

2022.9.7 提交 (2022.9.7 submit)
2022.9.7 與編輯 (2022.9.7 with editor)