Verified Reviews - ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
高岭石 2022-10-19
Does anyone have any recent submissions that we can discuss?
高岭石 2022-10-19
Excuse me, is there any result now? I have the same situation and it has been almost a month.
kydl 2022-10-19
"Half a month is normal."
Geostar 2022-10-14
Is this journal particularly slow right now? I submitted to the journal from October 2nd to October 14th.
二二二二二二 2022-09-18
Good luck!
广西郭富城 2022-09-12
Submit for repair Sep 12, 2022 Under Review
广西郭富城 2022-09-10
Submit for repair
广西郭富城 2022-09-03
Sep 02, 2022 Revise
This is already written in English. If you need to make any changes or provide more context, please let me know.
小迪 2022-08-20
How is it going now? My required review has been completed for almost three months.
天宇0528 2022-08-19
Did you record it, my friend? How long is the cycle?
广西郭富城 2022-08-10
Aug 09, 2022 Required Reviews Completed
蓝眼睛 2022-07-30
Approximately one and a half months with the editor, and if the quality is not high, it will be directly rejected. Then, after about one and a half months, there will be review comments. If there is a rejection, the editor will reject it. In addition, the decision-making power for the speed of review lies with the reviewers.
xixixixixixi 2022-07-28
It seems that it takes two weeks to process.
ll172 2022-07-22
I am the corresponding author. There is a note in the article explaining this, but in the system, I set myself as the corresponding author and submitted it using my own account. Is this also not acceptable? (Strange, the system is prompting me that I am sending messages too quickly and cannot reply to you.)
ll172 2022-07-22
How long did the status of "submitted to journal" last?
ll172 2022-07-21
May I ask, how many days does it usually take for a paper to be submitted to a journal?
kydl 2022-07-11
Can you please remind me?
CQCQ 2022-07-09
Too slow, it has been under review for nine months without any progress.
baoyd20 2022-07-08
The special issue I submitted was rejected due to limited space after revising the comments. It's really frustrating. Now I have resubmitted it to the regular issue.
明天 2022-07-02
On June 24th, sent back to the author. Returned on the 27th, and it is still in this status now. I don't know why it's so slow.
DOCTER WANG 2022-06-27
Can non-corresponding authors not track the status of their submissions to this journal?
明天 2022-06-20
On June 12th, submitted to the journal. It is now June 20th, and there has been no progress for 8 days!
天空之城-- 2022-06-14
Under normal circumstances, joint author confirmation is not required.
胖鱼6 2022-06-14
It has been several days since it was submitted to the journal, and there has been no progress. Do all co-authors need to click on the confirmation link in the email?
蓝眼睛 2022-06-13
It takes me a month to submit it for review with the editor.
科研人008 2022-06-11
The saddest thing is that I cannot choose the editor-in-chief. I don't want to let that GONG editor handle it either. Every time, he directly rejects the submission. However, this journal has been publishing articles in this field in recent years. With a Chinese editor-in-chief, this journal will probably decline further.
xixixixixixi 2022-06-08
I quit after a week and was sent back.
happy-one 2022-06-05
My editing took about a week, and it has been reviewed for over a month now. There was an update on June 3rd, so feedback should be given soon.
广西郭富城 2022-06-02
with the editor, it takes at least two weeks to complete, generally around 20 days.
提-桶-跑-路 2022-06-01
2022.04.15 Submit to journal - Submitted to journal on April 15, 2022.
2022.04.18 Incomplete submissions - Submissions were incomplete on April 18, 2022.
2022.04.19 Resubmit to journal - Resubmitted to journal on April 19, 2022.
2022.04.24 Submissions Being Processed - Submissions are currently being processed as of April 24, 2022.
2022.04.28 Under review - Currently under review as of April 28, 2022.
未完待续 - To be continued (not translated).
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started