凡尘清泉 2022-09-14

Submitted on May 31st, underwent major and minor revisions once each, accepted on September 14th.
We encountered a reviewer who intentionally made things difficult for us, forcing us to redo all the work several times. We requested an extension for the second revision, but the reviewer still did not agree. Finally, the editor directly accepted it after the second revision.

fjt617 2022-09-13

My paper also received modified-general changes. After I returned the revised version, I received an email the next day saying it will be handled by the Editor in Chief. I would like to ask if you also have this status? Does this mean the outcome of my paper is not good?

huyifei 2022-08-27

It takes about 5 months, and the journal has requirements for innovation. The quality of the article needs to be strong. The editor has strict requirements for formatting! Looking forward to ECM surpassing AE.

hyq.whu 2022-08-23

Journals emphasize innovation, and it feels that both theoretical innovation and experimental verification are more easily accepted.

L_Huaijun 2022-08-22

Hello, I would like to ask, is a pure experimental paper good? I see that most of them are a combination of experimentation and simulation.

hyq.whu 2022-08-18

The initial review was fast, but the second review took longer due to a change of reviewers. Everything else was fine.

葡萄冻 2022-08-15

Posted on May 30th, under review on May 31st.

桀桀 2022-08-02

Submitted on July 29th, edited on July 31st but not approved.

JQ 2022-08-01

This is my academic ideal. I am fortunate to have recently published a small achievement and would like to share with everyone the main timeline. I wish everyone's achievements will be accepted soon!

May 29, 2022: Submitted (under review after 5 days)
July 6, 2022: Recommended by the editor and reviewer (2 reviewers, 8 comments, minor revisions expected)
July 21, 2022: Revised (under review after 2 days)
July 31, 2022: Accepted

Overall, it only took 2 months, which is really fast in the field of energy. Some top journals may not even return feedback within 3 months.

cwk 2022-07-03

2.27 Submission
5.19 Revision
6.07 Revised draft submitted
7.02 Accept

wendell99 2022-06-30

Hello, I would like to ask a question. What is the required level of repetition for a manuscript in terms of ECM?

SCI好难发 2022-06-22

Hello, may I ask what the theme of the articles you are hiring for is? Does this magazine also accept articles on pure electric power systems?

cooper211 2022-06-21

Two revisions were made, with the first review taking three months, and the second review returning feedback in one month. The third review took about two weeks before it was accepted.

hhjhgh 2022-06-17

May I ask how many rounds of review you have gone through after submitting your manuscript for eight months?

hhjhgh 2022-06-17

This is already the third round of reviewing. Has anyone encountered a similar situation before?

hhjhgh 2022-06-17

May I ask how many rounds of review does this journal typically go through?

北博 2022-06-17

The review process is fast. Submitted on May 10th, received the first-round comments on June 2nd. The review comments are very professional. After making the revisions, it was accepted one week later.

liuzhongyong 2022-05-27

2022.03.07 Submission
2022.04.23 Minor revision (Editor's note: Accepted after significant modification)
2022.05.10 Return
2022.05.21 Accepted

hhjhgh 2022-05-25

Our situations are similar. May I ask if you have reached a conclusion?

cwk 2022-05-17

How long have you been investing for?

云朵奥 2022-05-13

Hello everyone, may I ask how is the reputation of this journal?

cwk 2022-05-11

It has been eight days since the Required Reviews were completed. Does anyone know how many days it usually takes for this?

W786 2022-04-18

Is there a requirement for the repetition rate?

tjwww 2022-04-16

2022.02.10 submitted to the journal
2022.02.11 with editor
2022.02.27 modify-general change
2022.03.16 resubmitted

Translated:

2022.02.10 - Submitted to the journal
2022.02.11 - Under review with editor
2022.02.27 - Modifications made (general changes)
2022.03.16 - Resubmitted

tjwww 2022-04-16

2022.02.10 submitted to the journal - Submitted to the journal on February 10, 2022.
2022.02.11 with editor - Under review with the editor on February 11, 2022.
2022.02.27 modify-general change - Made general changes in the revision on February 27, 2022.
2022.03.16 resubmitted - Resubmitted on March 16, 2022.

zxxdx 2022-03-31

How did the host's second trial go?

所谓爱隔山海 2022-03-28

Dec. 31, 2021: Submitted to journal
Dec. 31, 2021: With editor/ Under Review
Feb. 20, 2022: Revision (Two reviewers, one major revision, one minor revision)
Mar. 3, 2022: Revision submitted to journal
Mar. 6, 2022: Under Review
Mar. 27, 2022: Accept
The first editor gave the reviewers one month to review; the second editor gave the reviewers three weeks to review. The ECM journal has a relatively fast processing speed and high requirements for innovation.

东大大鱼人 2022-03-17

The processing speed of ECM journals is very fast and has been of great help to me personally. I hope ECM continues to improve and I will definitely consider submitting good articles in the future.

BJYY 2022-03-17

Dec 21, 2021 submitted
Dec 22, 2021 with editor
Dec 23, 2021 under review
Feb 9, 2022 revise (Possibly slower due to Christmas. Four reviewers provided 39 comments, most of which were answered well, while some were more challenging. One month was given for revisions.)
March 4, 2022 submitted
March 15, 2022 with editor/under review/required reviews completed (In the response letter, three reviewers agreed to accept the modifications and I'm not sure why one reviewer is missing.)
March 16, 2022 accept
This is my first article as a first-year graduate student. I will strive to do better in the future. Best of luck to everyone in submitting their papers!

小破孩 2022-03-02

May I ask which category the research direction of your submission belongs to? I usually have three reviewers.