Verified Reviews - Energy & Environmental Science
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

斯维特企鹅 2022-04-20

I want to ask, how long does it usually take for the initial evaluation to reach the editor's hands?

Cedar 2022-04-13

initial submitted 11-Feb-2022
minor revision 31-Mar-2022
revision submitted 04-Apr-2022
minor revision 12-Apr-2022
revision submitted 12-Apr-2022
accepted 12-Apr-2022
Efficient! Friendly Editor! Wishing the journal continuous improvement!

来瓶82年的娃哈哈 2022-04-12

With unknown results, it is incredible that EES is now so slow. The previous month's results came out in no time.

Leve 2022-04-05

xd, have you come up with any ideas yet? I'm short of 10 days, three months, and still have no ideas.

王宇成 2022-03-27

January 13, 2022, submitted; March 7, 2022, still under review. The review process of EES is slower than the Nature series now.

Leve 2022-03-21

Submitted on 2022.01.15, it is still in peer review until now. It has been over two months, a bit slow. Is there anyone who has experienced a similar situation?

yllovely 2022-03-01

8 days for review, 40 days to provide comments. Initially, there were two reviewers with opposing opinions, and an additional reviewer was sought by the editor as an arbitrator. Unfortunately, this reviewer had a slightly negative stance. It's a bit disappointing as we have high expectations for innovation and have been striving for it. We are a small research team, hoping that one day we can also get a publication accepted.

hj_huangjin 2022-02-13

My 16 days turned into "with editor", and I still don't know what will happen next. Praying.

hj_huangjin 2022-02-13

What is the result? My 16 days turned into "with editor".

秋日暖阳 2021-11-30

Trash journal, the quality of the papers on it is uneven, I don't know where the high impact factor comes from.
Whatever the reviewers say, that's what it is. The editor has no judgment, I don't know what the role of the editorial board is!
Appeal approved on August 11th, submitted for review on August 19th, and rejected notification on November 29th. Waiting for a reviewer's opinion for over three months, is the situation in the UK so severe that editors can't work? If it's going to be rejected, can it be done faster? It's a waste of time! Sophie Orchard, the editor, is extremely irresponsible, a trash editor, trash reviewers! I even sent a reminder email on October 6th! According to the comments, the results of appeals usually come out within a month, why is it so slow!
Submitted on June 7th, notified of review comments on July 7th, the first round was quite fast, editor Michael Spencelayh.

langezi1216 2021-09-16

What happened afterwards?

兔兔爱吃肉 2021-09-10

Initial assessment takes 15 days.

langezi1216 2021-09-07

It has been over a week since the initial assessment. I don't know how long this stage will last, and now with the situation of the pandemic, I wonder if it will be even slower. I feel very anxious.

一叶知秋 2021-09-06

You can directly submit the full text.

energy storage 2021-09-04

Excuse me, for the comprehensive submission of EES, is a review proposal required? Or can we submit it directly?

敬圣 2021-07-12

Slower than imagined, too difficult.

Nitreduction 2021-07-02

In the years 2020-2021, a total of 5 articles were submitted, with 2 of them being accepted for review and the other 3 not being submitted for review. The review process in EES is indeed rigorous, although the speed is a bit slow, but compared to the Nature series, it is considered fast. Generally, the initial consideration takes about a week, and the first review takes about 2 months. The final acceptance takes a little over 3 months. The second review is also strict, and the editor will find new reviewers for it. The editor is indeed very professional.

qq572020211 2021-06-29

The fourth submission and also the fourth one for review. The previous three were rejected twice. I hope this one will be accepted, so that I can achieve a 50% probability.

Forever24 2021-06-04

Congratulations to the host for winning EES. May I ask how many reviewers there are for the first review? Are the comments harsh?

Anjun Hu 2021-06-01

Initial submitted: 18 Feb 2021
With editor: 20 Feb 2021
In peer review: 23 Feb 2021
Major revision: 12 April 2021
Revision submitted: 8 May 2021
Accepted: 27 May 2021
First published: 28 May 2021
Article information: "An artificial hybrid interphase endowing ultrahigh-rate and practical lithium metal anode"
Link: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE00508A

sciscisci 2021-04-06

First time submission, didn't expect this high-scoring journal to be so slow. It has been ten days and it is still in the initial review status. I am amazed.

Ericccc 2021-02-13

2020-09-11 Submitted
2020-09-18 With editor
2020-09-21 Under review
2020-10-06 Major revision
2020-11-05 Revision submitted
2020-11-24 Accepted.

Translation:
2020-09-11 Submitted
2020-09-18 With editor
2020-09-21 Under review
2020-10-06 Major revision
2020-11-05 Revision submitted
2020-11-24 Accepted.

明天早上吃啥啊 2021-01-16

Dear, may I ask how you have been recently? Have you submitted it for review? I submitted it ten days ago as well, but I don't know what the situation is.

石出新叶 2021-01-08

I want to ask when did you submit? I submitted on December 23rd, and I still haven't received any news until now.

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started