Verified Reviews - Energy
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

小菜博 2023-04-21

2023.04.20 with editor - The date has been updated, but the status has not been updated.

小蔡博士 2023-04-20

You can add WeChat mini program by scanning the QR code in the link, where you will find instructions on how to add it, and inside you can see the specific quantity.

mozhisha0063 2023-04-20

How to determine the specific number of reviewers? In my case, one reviewer completed the opinion, two or more were invited, and two or more accepted the review.

keyanxiaobai--- 2023-04-19

Does anyone know what the repetition rate of energy is?

小学渣 2023-04-19

2022-10-20 Submission
2023-01-24 Major Revision
2023-02-23 Minor Revision
2023-04-17 Acceptance
Three reviewers were assigned for the review process. Reviewer 3 was not very familiar and did not accept the review during the second review. The editor made the decision to accept based on the reviews of the other two reviewers.

云天河 2023-04-19

2022.10.04 submit - Submitted on October 4th, 2022.
2022.12.21 major revision - Major revision required by December 21st, 2022.
2023.01.10 resubmit - Resubmit by January 10th, 2023.
2023.02.17 major revision - Major revision required by February 17th, 2023.
2023.02.24 resubmit - Resubmit by February 24th, 2023.
2023.04.05 major revision - Major revision required by April 5th, 2023.
2023.04.07 resubmit - Resubmit by April 7th, 2023.
2023.04.18 accept - Accepted on April 18th, 2023.

小蔡博士 2023-04-19

2023.04.19 under review. The invitation to reviewers has increased from 7 to 8, with 2 acceptances.

小菜博 2023-04-19

What direction?

thfdiiii 2023-04-18

2023.04.17 Under review!

thfdiiii 2023-04-18

2023.04.17 Under Review

小菜博 2023-04-18

2023.04.13 submitted to journal - This means that a document or article was sent to a journal for publication on April 13, 2023.

2023.04.16 with editor - This indicates that the document or article was received by the editor on April 16, 2023.

小蔡博士 2023-04-18

2023.04.17 under review. The invitation to reviewers has increased from 4 to 7, and 1 invitation has been accepted.

Albertli 2023-04-18

2022.11.7 resubmit
2023.1.23 major revision
2023.2.16 submit revised manuscript
2023.4.17 accept
A total of three reviewers, the first reviewer accepted it directly after the initial review, while the second and third reviewers provided twenty comments. The manuscript is related to the field of photovoltaics.

广隶士口 2023-04-17

2022.11.30 Submitted to journal
2022.12.01 With Editor
2022.12.04 With Editor
2022.12.05 Under Review
2022.12.06 Under Review
2022.12.09 Under Review
2022.12.11 Under Review
2022.12.20 Under Review
2023.01.01 Under Review
2023.01.12 Major Revisions
2023.02.25 Submitted to journal
2023.02.27 With Editor
2023.02.27 Under Review
2023.04.15 Accept

Dr.谢耳朵 2023-04-17

Contacting customer service will only help you inquire about the status of your manuscript review, and it is not related to the editorial department. The reminder letter is written to the editorial department, and there may be a risk of rejection when sending a reminder letter, but this is uncertain.

excepthyd 2023-04-16

It has been one month since my submission and I am still with the editor.

太空人 2023-04-16

Is contacting customer service as risky as pushing for manuscript submission?

Galactic Hearts 2023-04-14

2023.03.24 accept
I made a typo earlier.

yyyaccept 2023-04-14

2023-4-13 Inviting 2+ Reviewers, Accepting 2 Review Invitations.

yyyaccept 2023-04-14

2023-4-13 Invite 2+ reviewers and accept invitations to review from 2 individuals.

Dr.谢耳朵 2023-04-14

In Elsevier support, there are options to contact customer service via email, phone, or live chat. Customer service can check the status of the review process.

Apple-Li 2023-04-13

3.27 submit: This means to submit something on March 27th.
4.05 with editor: This indicates that something will be reviewed or worked on with an editor at 4:05.
4.13 with editor: This means that something will be reviewed or worked on with an editor at 4:13.

Apple-Li 2023-04-13

Is it still with the editor now? Have you not found a suitable reviewer and been dragging it along?

小蔡博士 2023-04-13

2023.04.12 Under Review Inviting reviewers to increase from three to four, with zero invitations accepted.

Taylor 2023-04-13

Hello, may I ask where can I see this status "<In November, it showed that the first reviewer completed the review, the first reviewer is currently reviewing, and the first reviewer is being invited;>"? Please enlighten me.

MES干饭人 2023-04-12

Maybe the editor forgot to attach the comments. I encountered this once before. You can send an email to inquire.

Alan~alan 2023-04-12

Excuse me, is there a direct route from "with editor" to "Decision"? Will it be rejected? It has been ten days and I still haven't received a rejection email.

Alan~alan 2023-04-12

2023.3.9 Submit to a journal
2023.3.14 with editor
2023.4.3 Decision in Process
2023.4.11 Decision in Process

Translation:
2023.3.9 Submitted to a journal
2023.3.14 Under review by the editor
2023.4.3 Decision being processed
2023.4.11 Decision being processed

Dr.谢耳朵 2023-04-12

I submitted the manuscript in August last year and in November it showed that the first reviewer had completed the review, the first reviewer is still reviewing, and the first reviewer is being invited. On January 5th this year, it changed to the first reviewer completing the review and the second reviewer is currently reviewing. Until April 11th, there was still no feedback on the review. So I wrote a reminder letter. Today, I received an email feedback saying it requires minor revisions, but strangely, there were no review comments provided. How should I make the revisions? Has anyone experienced a similar situation?

thfdiiii 2023-04-12

2023.04.012 avec éditeur translates to "2023.04.012 with editor" in English.

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started