Verified Reviews - Ecological Indicators
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

GUNDAM 2022-07-23

I hope for a good result after submitting.
Recording the submission time:
2022.7.22 - submit to journal
2022.7.23 - with editor

咿咿呀呀 2022-07-07

Submitted at the end of November 2021, it took about three days for the paper to enter the review process. After about two months, it was returned for revisions. There were three reviewers, the first two had no major issues, but the third reviewer was excessively meticulous, and I was given a 20-day revision period. After the revisions, the second round of revisions took about ten days, and only the opinions of the third reviewer remained. There were fewer issues compared to the first round, and I was given only 15 days to revise. After resubmitting, it took about ten more days for them to ask for further polishing. I thought it was almost over, but after submitting the final version, it took another one and a half months to find out that four additional reviewers were added. I was completely disheartened at that time, even though there were only two minor comments, I almost lost the motivation to make further changes. After making the revisions, it took another ten days for the paper to be accepted.

小鱼恋上虾 2022-07-07

2022/07/06 Under review

feng281 2022-06-29

It takes 2 months from submission to acceptance online, and the layout fee is a bit high, 2500 dollars.

小鱼恋上虾 2022-06-28

2022/06/28 Under review

小鱼恋上虾 2022-06-28

2022/06/28 With editor

小鱼恋上虾 2022-06-27

2022/06/27 Submitted to journal

刘振元 2022-06-27

Please provide a detailed record of the submission date. We hope it can be published here:

2022/06/26 Submitted to journal
2022/06/26 With editor

enen111 2022-06-23

A very poor journal, it's not that the journal is bad, but the editing level is not good, really not good!

mingji173 2022-06-11

The level of the reviewers for this journal is uneven; the quality and level of the reviewers they found for me are really poor. I felt unhappy with the citations they recommended to me, so I checked them and found that none of them are SCI papers. The review comments were also very casual, with just one sentence under each subheading stating that modifications or improvements are needed. Except for the introduction, there was not a single specific statement in the review comments. I will never submit to this journal again in the future.

芳盖 2022-06-10

It's hard to say, it depends on luck. I don't feel the probability is very high.

lft 2022-06-10

We have reminded twice, saying that we have been continuously looking for reviewers.

tao 2022-06-09

Won't it take so long? Didn't you ask?

lft 2022-06-06

Mine too, I have been waiting for the review for 10 months and still haven't received any response.

wang-jing 2022-06-02

It has been a whole year, and I haven't received any review comments. Please be cautious if you want to submit your manuscript.

SunJianFeng 2022-05-18

The layout fee is $2500, so expensive, I feel sorry for the teacher.

啪啦 2022-05-16

Has this journal been fully open-sourced?

CMoo 2022-05-16

The submission result is revision, does it mean there is no distinction between major and minor revisions? I noticed that yours is a minor revision.

Ammo 2022-05-16

Approximately 15,000 RMB.

张正若 2022-05-16

May I ask, how much is the layout fee for OA?

Ammo 2022-05-16

After OA, the speed is really fast.
Submitted on 2022.4.3
Minor revision on 4.18
Revised on 5.1
Accepted on 5.16

夏至未至zy-123 2022-05-15

Excuse me, is it only through communication that one can see the progress of the article?

tomatoxiao666 2022-05-14

Hmm, well then, should we wait a little longer? The main issue is that I noticed the state date has been stuck on April 25 and hasn't changed. I don't know if it has been reviewed or not.

Cabot 2022-05-14

Now everything is about efficiency, the speed is urgent, the standards are high, and the costs are expensive. - -

Cabot 2022-05-14

The speed of reviewing manuscripts in one month is normal, isn't it?

tomatoxiao666 2022-05-14

Dear experts,

May I ask about the submission made on April 13th? It is now May 14th and it is still "under review". The Status Date has remained at April 25th (why does it keep showing April 25th, what does it mean?). It has been a month and there is still no result. I am getting anxious. Can I send an email to inquire about it?

Thank you all in advance!!

rain00000 2022-05-13

May I ask if it is possible to be non-OA? According to the journal description, it is an OA journal.

1654397198@qq.com 2022-05-12

May I ask, have we entered the "under review" stage? The publishing house sent an email saying that they need confirmation from all authors. I had already confirmed when submitting the manuscript as the corresponding author. Is it okay if the other contributors do not confirm?

rsering 2022-05-11

Journal review is fast, but the publication fee is a bit expensive. However, it seems that you can choose non-OA when submitting. The questions raised by the two experts are also professional and rigorous. Below is the status change of my submission for reference to fellow contributors who are currently submitting.
January 10th - Submitted to the journal
January 14th - Under review
February 3rd - Revision requested based on comments from two external reviewers, deadline for revised manuscript is March 4th
February 18th - Uploaded revised manuscript, with editor
February 20th - Under review
March 1st - Required reviews completed
March 3rd - Accepted

123爱思思7 2022-05-01

I have been under review for 3 months, and I don't know when I will receive the review response. Waiting is so frustrating.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More