Verified Reviews - Ecological Indicators
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

浩天 2023-06-27

We are about to give feedback soon. When did you submit the manuscript?

疯狂的兔子会receive 2023-06-27

Does anyone know what this status means: "required reviews completed"? I've never seen it before when submitting.

会飞的猪~ 2023-06-26

After the final draft is completed, a link will be sent to the corresponding author for payment.

洛轻尘 2023-06-25

Excuse me, how should I be notified to pay the layout fee after being hired? How do I proceed with it? There is no prompt in the submission system.

洛轻尘 2023-06-25

Submitted in April of the 23rd year, it was reviewed the next day, with a total of three rounds of review. The second round of review only had one formatting issue. Accepted on June 19th.

I just wanted to ask when to pay the page fee? I haven't received any notification, and I can't see it in the submission system either.

renzifushuai 2023-06-22

Hello, may I ask who is the editor?

lkl913 2023-06-21

6.19 accept. The third review did not provide any feedback and was accepted directly, scaring the mouse.

24March 2023-06-20

What happened to the original poster afterwards?

关大牛 2023-06-13

The journal that has been hired is a good journal, hahaha.

lkl913 2023-06-13

They will send you an email with a link attached, which you can use to check the status of the review. You can see how many reviewers have been invited. Previously, I always had two reviewers, so it showed "review invitations: 2". This time it shows "2+" (of course, the newly invited reviewers might not accept the review), but I am still worried about receiving major revisions again.

洛轻尘 2023-06-13

May I ask how you found out that the editor has asked three more people to review? My third review has been 10 days already, and I haven't received any feedback yet.

lkl913 2023-06-12

Not Hua Shi hhh but just nearby~~
Today, on June 12th, I solemnly take back what I said about the smooth submission. I originally thought that one reviewer agreed and one reviewer's minor revisions were almost finalized! However, I found out today that the editor has once again conducted external reviews, and they have even found at least three additional reviewers. Have any of you experienced this situation with your family members?

好好好港港 2023-06-12

My external review has been going on for two months. Currently, two people are reviewing it, and depending on the situation, they may have to find a third person for me. This journal is really unreasonable.

giserLiu 2023-06-12

This is the alumni of China Normal University's Institute of Geography and Natural Resources, ahahaha.

lkl913 2023-06-09

3.4 submission
3.4-3.15 technical check - multiple resubmissions due to missing line numbers/inconsistency between the order of the main text table and separately uploaded table/communication error with wrong contact person (first time submitting to SCI)
3.16-4.28 first review completed, assigned three reviewers, one rejected the review while the other two provided several comments. One reviewer was Chinese (with Chinese parentheses, haha), and the other was a foreign teacher (even guessed who it might be). The Chinese reviewer gave professional and challenging suggestions, requesting additional data and drawings. The foreign teacher provided positive feedback on the well-written paper and mentioned the need for revision, pointing out a few minor issues.
5.12-6.7 second review completed, foreign teacher agreed to publish, Chinese teacher pointed out four minor issues regarding wording.
6.9 submitted the revised paper.
The research group submitted their first English paper and were unsure about the journal's reputation. They usually read articles from this journal and felt it was good, and the research content also matched the journal's scope, so they decided to submit. The submission process went relatively smoothly and the handling speed was fast. However, when submitting the second paper two months later, the handling speed noticeably slowed down. It took a month to reach the editor, but after sending the editorial email, the review process quickly commenced. Currently, all external reviewers have accepted the review for the second paper.

Taufik8 2023-06-09

April 27 revise, May 4 submit revision, May 12 under review.

yukine 2023-06-08

6.8日 - Transfer to ECOIND
7.28日 - Reject, subject does not match.

ayzx 2023-06-04

Excuse me, does this journal not reject manuscripts during the initial review? It seems like everyone is submitting their work, and most of them appear to be accepted.

ayzx 2023-06-04

I was not allowed to make any modifications, and it was directly sent for external review. I wanted to ask if this journal does not reject manuscripts during the initial review. I haven't seen any comments online about anyone being rejected during the initial review.

逃跑计划 2023-06-02

After the status is changed back, you will be asked to modify the format and then submit it for review.

ayzx 2023-06-02

May I ask how the outcome is? I also went from "Submitted to Journal" to "with editor" and now it has directly become "Submitted to Journal" again.

科研小白gogo 2023-05-31

How long after the online publication of the thesis is the payment of the publication fee required?

马金辉 2023-05-31

5.27 submit for review
5.7 revise
5.24 repair
5.31 hire
The editors and reviewers are extremely efficient, almost lightning-fast. The reviewers' opinions are very pertinent~ Highly recommended~

独立元素 2023-05-26

May I ask where can I see if the reviewers have accepted the review?

hkwhkwhkw 2023-05-24

Need money. Before 2500, now 2600.

玩命书生 2023-05-24

I submitted it in November last year, and the first review has not come back yet. Is it normal to have only one reviewer?

科研小白gogo 2023-05-19

In the last round, I did not go through the state you mentioned. I went directly from "under review" to "accept."

池塘 2023-05-19

Hello, may I ask how long it takes for the status "Required Reviews Completed" after submitting the first round of modifications? I noticed that two reviewers completed the review within three days after returning it, but there is still one reviewer who accepted the invitation but hasn't completed the review yet.

DD:- 2023-05-18

Is it normal that no one has accepted the review invitations sent since May 10th that are still under review?

科研小白gogo 2023-05-17

First time submitting to an ecological indicator, although the process was difficult, the outcome was ultimately good. Now I will share my submission timeline experience for everyone's reference!

January 7th: Submission
January 20th: Under review by editor
January 30th: Under review
February 18th: Revision requested
March 20th: Revised and resubmitted (re_sub_1)
April 3rd: Second revision requested
April 16th: Revised and resubmitted (re_sub_2)
May 16th: Accepted

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now