莫名独具 2022-07-08

Did you submit it for review?

X~X 2022-06-28

I didn't receive any response after sending emails through the system. I am prepared to directly contact the editor-in-chief. If they want to reject it, they should do it quickly. I really dislike this kind of procrastination, it shows a complete lack of responsibility.

弗林 2022-06-24

My 6.8 is still with the editor until now.

GIAO GIAO爱文章 2022-06-23

Mine is the same, slow and speechless. It has been almost a month with no progress! May 28 submission, May 31 resubmission, and June 7 with the editor until now.

zhxing_x 2022-06-23

May 30, 2022, Submission
May 31, 2022, With Editor
Until now, I'm really amazed.
Is the editor a bit...

zw12345 2022-06-09

3.1 submitted to the journal
3.6 Under review
4.27 Major revision, two reviewers, one minor revision, one major revision
5.27 Resubmit
6.6 Accept
The journal is quite rigorous, and the editors are also very diligent and responsible. It is a good journal.

LYQ 2022-04-21

Pure Ocean Journal, has been repeatedly rejected and resubmitted, with the total number of review comments not exceeding ten lines.

神龙 2022-03-27

From submission to acceptance, it took 4 months.

神龙 2022-03-27

In the field of metallurgical engineering, significant innovation is required in order to pass the editing stage and be considered for review. Despite being an advanced powder technology, the acceptance rate for articles in the field of metallurgical engineering is very low. The overall quality of the journal is very good, and the three external reviewers are all very responsible. We hope that the journal will continue to improve.

Miss ZhangZhang 2021-12-05

The reviewers seem to value the direction of the article. Originally, it should have been accepted within three months, but due to my own reasons, there was a delay of two months, resulting in a total of five months.

快点accept 2021-11-02

May I ask which editor you are?

Mercury 2021-10-07

With an editor, it was rejected after 20 days, saying that it lacked innovation. The number of articles received was much higher than what could be accepted. Implicitly, it means that there were too many articles submitted and yours was close to being rejected.

Mercury 2021-09-25

The text you provided appears to be a mix of Chinese and English. Here is the translation into English:

"On September 16th, I submitted it, and on the same day, the editor replied about the formatting issue. They requested the entire text to be in font size 10 or 12. I made the changes the next day and resubmitted it to the editor. However, until today, the status has not changed."

快点accept 2021-09-07

I have been with the editor for three months, various contacts, but there has been no progress. The editor keeps saying that the abstract image is not clear, and when sent to the editorial department, it is never received. On the day of the three-month mark, I decided to withdraw the submission and it was rejected...

莫道君行早 2021-08-30

It has been two months with the editor, but there has been no news or progress.

流程工业运行优化 2021-08-22

Replying, from submission to rejection took 4 months. It seems that 4 reviewers were assigned, and only 2 provided feedback. One requested revisions, suggesting that I include more experimental descriptions and address language issues. The other initially praised the writing but mentioned that it did not fit the scope of this journal. They recommended me to submit to a non-open access, top-tier journal in the first quartile. Ultimately, the editor rejected it. Hmmmm, just giving you all a reference. If it leans towards chemistry, go for it. If it leans towards engineering and manufacturing, you might want to reconsider.

芃芃不是梵梵 2021-07-26

I have been with the editor for a long time, but there has been no progress at all...

流程工业运行优化 2021-07-25

My April 18th submission is still under external review and the "under review" date keeps changing. Sigh, I guess it's not looking good.

我有paper 2021-07-08

So frustrating! They don't reply to emails! I have been in communication with the editor for over three months, but they haven't responded or taken any action on my request to withdraw the submission. It has been almost a month without any reply or progress. Finally, I wrote a letter to the editor-in-chief, and the editor replied the next day.

边牧 2021-06-16

Hello, may I ask if there is a template format available?

橙子 2021-05-15

The overall efficiency is very high.
The editing process of the article will begin within a week and will be continuously reviewed. There may be changes in dates during this period (possibly due to changing reviewers).
After three months, the reviewer's comments will be received, and then minor revisions will be made within three days.

CQU成勇 2021-04-20

Hello, may I ask how long does it take for "Required Reviews Completed" to be maintained? When will the editor handle it? It has been one week so far.

X.J. Gao 2021-03-01

2020.10.6 Submission
2020.10.10 With editor
About a month in the editor's hands, sent for review
2020.12.7 Received reviewer comments. The experts were very serious and responsible, and their opinions were of high quality.
2021.1.17 Revised
2021.3.1 Accept
The overall speed of the journal is acceptable, and the reviewers are very professional. The journal's level has steadily improved over the past few years.