Verified Reviews - ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

LKLKLKLK 2023-06-13

It's really tormenting.

蛋蛋打不死 2023-06-13

Has your status changed?

蛋蛋打不死 2023-06-13

Is it still submitted? Has yours changed?

陈超小玲 2023-06-13

6.1 submission, continuously submitted, no "with editor" in between, directly under review on June 12th.

圣天凌阳 2023-06-13

Has the post been handed over to the editor yet? I have not with the editor from 6/8 to 6/13.

蛋蛋打不死 2023-06-12

2023.6.07 submitted - Submitted on June 7, 2023.
2023.6.12 submitted - Submitted on June 12, 2023.

LKLKLKLK 2023-06-11

5.30投稿 translates to "Submitted on 5.30" in English.
6.11submitted translates to "Submitted on 6.11" in English.
这效率。。。 translates to "This efficiency..." in English.

清商 2023-06-10

I should be the author with the longest review period in the history of AFM, but finally, the result is satisfactory. The submission process was roughly as follows:

Submitted on August 16, 2022.
Sent for review in early September 2022.
Received first review comments around January 18, 2023 (a direct acceptance, two major revisions, and one rejection). The editor requested major revisions, and there was a two-week revision period. Extension was requested due to the long review process, possibly because it was sent twice - once with positive and negative reviews.
Revised and submitted again in early February 2023, addressing the questions raised by the three reviewers and conducting additional experiments. It was a long wait.
Received second review comments around April 1, 2023. Minor revisions were requested, and the overall evaluation was positive. Surprisingly, the reviewer who previously rejected the paper agreed to accept it this time, providing a positive evaluation (top 15%). Two other reviewers raised a few minor questions, and the revised version was submitted before Tomb Sweeping Day. Another long wait ensued.
Received third review comments on May 3, 2023. One reviewer was satisfied, but the third reviewer raised two very minor questions (no need for additional experiments). Some explanations were provided, and a few sentences were modified. Initially, it seemed unlikely that the paper would be sent for review again, but unexpectedly, it was sent for another round of review. More waiting...
Finally, on June 8, 2023, the official acceptance notice was received. The process is complete, celebration time! Thanks to Julia Reuter, the editor, and all the reviewers.

lilingggg 2023-06-10

Is it the editor's rejection or the reviewer's rejection?

qq572020211 2023-06-09

AM editor advises switching to AFM and says that by switching to AFM, the submission can be sent directly for review, so try your luck.

shangkedu 2023-06-09

Have you recommended switching?

Super炫King 2023-06-08

Insufficient innovation.

Leona 2023-06-08

05.29 submitted - Submitted on May 29th
06.08 还是submitted - Still submitted on June 8th
06.09 吐槽完,终于等到转投...... - After complaining, finally waited for a transfer...

神经蛙蛙 2023-06-07

5.19 Submission
5.31 Major revisions, responding to AM's comments on the manuscript
6.6 Morning: make revisions, Afternoon: resubmit for review
Hope everything goes smoothly!

Cyril00 2023-06-07

6.7 Suggestion to switch investments
Perhaps the work is still not good enough, but overall, the progress is indeed a bit slow...

食野 2023-06-07

2023.6.7 is still submitted. Please reject it soon. What's the reason for the lack of status update? ?

lilingggg 2023-06-06

0426 submitted
0430 under review
0531 major revision (5% 15% 15%)
Two weeks of revision time, hoping everything goes smoothly, friends.

Akira12345 2023-06-06

Does anyone know the real-time impact factor of AFM?

captZ 2023-06-06

05 29 submitted: May 29th, submitted.
06 06 submitted: June 6th, submitted. A bit slow, huh?

3Q薇恩 2023-06-06

What can be done if the progress cannot be seen?

食野 2023-06-06

Does it go directly from "submitted" to "under review"?

Cyril00 2023-06-06

Your reviewing speed is too fast, I envy you.

Cyril00 2023-06-06

Still in the hands of the editor, it's really slow!

如此彻底 2023-06-05

Just finished criticizing and submitted for review on 2023.6.5.

如此彻底 2023-06-05

5.24 Submission
5.30 Discovered that the email address of the submission author was mistakenly entered incorrectly, resubmitted.
Currently, the submission status is still Manuscript submitted.
Too slow!!!!!
Also, may I ask everyone if, in the case of resubmitting a manuscript after applying, does the review process need to start over?

如此彻底 2023-06-05

In addition, may I ask if I need to requeue the manuscript when sending an email to the editorial department to apply for resubmission?

如此彻底 2023-06-05

The speed is too slow!!!!
Submitted on 5.24.
Discovered on 5.30 that there was a typo in the author's email for the submission system, so it was modified and resubmitted.
Until now, the manuscript is still submitted.

食野 2023-06-05

2023.5.26 submitted
2023.6.5 still submitted

神经蛙蛙 2023-05-31

With Editor, you and I are probably a batch of manuscripts.

Cyril00 2023-05-31

Finally updated...

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search