Verified Reviews - COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

太难 2022-11-30

Hello, have you experienced two external audits? Why did you make changes three times?

benc 2022-11-30

Yes, it's possible. You can make changes when you have proof.

球球了编辑和审稿人 2022-11-29

11.28 Under Review
Reviews completed: 0
Review invitations accepted: 0
Review invitations sent: 2+

球球了编辑和审稿人 2022-11-27

11.26 Once again with editor

eric1105 2022-11-27

May I ask the seniors here? I (the first author) need to submit a paper on behalf of my advisor (the corresponding author) in the submission system. However, it seems that the system only allows the corresponding author to make the final submission, and only the corresponding author can see the progress of the submission. I would like to inquire whether the corresponding author in the submission system can be different from the actual corresponding author of the article.

球球了编辑和审稿人 2022-11-26

11.24 Delivery
11.25 with editor

eric1105 2022-11-26

I would like to ask if it is necessary to upload a conflict of interest statement document signed by each author when submitting? What should be done if some co-authors (students) have graduated?

编辑和审稿人的舔狗 2022-11-25

I feel like the reviewers haven't read my replies to their comments...

编辑和审稿人的舔狗 2022-11-25

It's only been 2 days since the revision for the return repair, but after being edited, it went straight from "under review" to "decision in process". Does this mean it's going to be rejected? So frustrating...

lanlianhua 2022-11-25

A medical niche specialty, on the third day of submission, the status has remained unchanged. Based on the comments section, there is a high probability of rejection. Therefore, I am starting to prepare for the submission to another journal.

linlinda123 2022-11-19

Did you choose OA?

linlinda123 2022-11-19

"May I ask if you have chosen OA?"

kangkang 2022-11-12

2022/11/11 Submission
2022/11/12 With Editor
2022/11/12 Under Review

yun233 2022-11-09

Hello, have you been hired? I also received acceptance in September, but now I can't find it on Web of Science.

皱皱 2022-11-07

First submission, overall feeling very good.
Submitted on June 11th, quickly under review.
Received submission suggestions on July 18th, nearly 30 suggestions (some were very detailed, and some grammar errors were also pointed out).
Due to the numerous revision suggestions, the revision process was relatively slow (I was lazy during the summer vacation).
Under review again on October 4th.
Accepted on October 14th.
The entire process was fast, and I didn't have to format it myself. I just had to submit the Word version, and there were no formatting requirements for the manuscript, which is very suitable for someone like me, who has never submitted before.

MJ-ID 2022-11-02

October 30th, accepted.
The child is about to cry.

kuien 2022-11-01

Posting for 10 days, the status changed directly from "with editor" to "decision in process". Does this mean it has been rejected?

Turbocc 2022-10-24

After the repair, three reviewers suggested to accept it directly, while the remaining one reviewer's comment is empty.

zzzzffff 2022-10-22

May I ask how long it takes for you to notify me about paying the layout fee after accepting it?

找个好中的期刊 2022-10-16

It should be accepted after the revised version is submitted.

找个好中的期刊 2022-10-16

After being rejected once, I became more and more angry and unwilling to accept it. So I rewrote another article and submitted it again.
Submitted on 5/14
With editor on 5/15
Under review on 5/15
After the submission was accepted by the editor, it went directly into the under review stage, but when checking the tracking link, there was no indication that the reviewer had accepted it. It took three months for someone to agree to review the article for the first round.
During the process, there were three rounds of revisions, and each time, the edited article was returned to the editor within a week.
Finally, it was accepted on 10/15.

找个好中的期刊 2022-10-16

The first paper submitted had three reviewers in the first round, two of them suggested revisions and one rejected it, and the editor requested revisions. In the second round, the number of reviewers increased to five, with two accepting, two suggesting revisions, and one rejecting it, and the editor requested revisions. In the third round, the same five reviewers from the second round were involved, with four accepting and one rejecting the paper. The editor rejected it. The whole process took three months, and the editor needed approval from all the reviewers to publish it.

是小小一呀 2022-10-12

Hello, regarding the four reviewers you mentioned for the first review, how many reviewers accepted the review for your second review?

Turbocc 2022-10-08

Yes, the second review accepted it directly.

太难 2022-10-07

How are you doing now, and did you receive any feedback?

太难 2022-10-07

Did the original poster find a reviewer now?

太难 2022-10-07

How long does it take to return after the second review?

太难 2022-10-06

Did the original poster accept the second trial directly?

太难 2022-10-06

xd, did your changes come back?

太难 2022-10-06

xd, your several reviewers

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started