piper22 2023-05-18

The state on the third day is decision in process. Sending.

一生要强 2023-05-13

May I ask how the current situation is? I also went straight to "decision in progress" and I estimate that it has been sent.

ljyljyok 2023-05-12

Big brother, how many comments do you usually receive from reviewers each time?
I submitted at around the same time as you, but I still haven't received the third round of revisions. I'm really anxious...

yang6125 2023-05-11

District 1 is still far from enough, and this journal is getting worse and worse. We better run away quickly.

非常想毕业 2023-05-10

When posting, the ID is already close to 4000, difficult to handle.

dylan456 2023-05-06

Directly ask for customer service for Elsevier journals.

zhangsheng 2023-05-06

Hello, may I ask how to know how many people accept manuscript reviews?

dylan456 2023-05-05

5.5 Two reviewers agreed to review, while seven reviewers did not accept the invitation.

lemon 2023-05-05

Improper editing, the reviewer didn't have any major opinions, and just rejected it without giving any reasons. What's even more infuriating is that it took a whole 7 months, affecting people's mindset.

sophiazhao 2023-05-05

I submitted it in December of the 22nd year. It has been under review for over half a year, and has been sent for external review three times. The reviewers were very perfunctory. Wouldn't it be better to reject it earlier? It's a waste of time, and I have a very negative impression of this journal. Be careful when considering submitting to it!

发SCI好难 2023-05-02

2023.05.01 avec l'éditeur translates to "2023.05.01 with the editor" in English.

发SCI好难 2023-05-01

2023.05.01提出

Hayreen 2023-04-27

The amount of articles submitted has increased significantly, does that mean we're going to be in trouble?

bhhy 2023-04-26

What's happening now? I made a direct decision with the editor in processing. I'm really worried.

方块面 2023-04-24

January 14 - Submission
February 8 - First round of review comments received (from 4 reviewers, gave more than 20 comments, all were okay)
March 17 - Revised version submitted
April 24 - Accepted
Pretty fast, wishing the journal continued success.

zhangsheng 2023-04-23

2023.04.23 under review

NIC_LI 2023-04-22

Remind once a month, with editor for 5 weeks.

jsxzj 2023-04-22

4.22, it has been over a month, call me back and ask me to reapply.

xfxheyy 2023-04-20

It has been over a month with the editor, even slow journals should move on to the next stage.

609623273@qq.com 2023-04-20

No response for a month.

jsxzj 2023-04-19

Hasn't there been any response for more than a month? It's very worrying.

292725651 2023-04-18

I applied twice and was rejected once after 4 hours and once after 6 days.

The magazine is becoming more and more impressive, and I can't reach its level. This year, it is predicted that the Impact Factor will be around 7.7 to 8.3 in 2022, and it will be promoted to a higher rank by the end of the year. I'm posting this to have it as proof!

yang6125 2023-04-18

Five-star rating, the reviewing speed is very fast, it took about three months in total, with minor revisions taking about two months. This is because the experiment itself was very thorough, and only a portion of the language description and the description of the experimental results needed to be modified. Overall, it was very nice. The next step is to directly aim for the top rank.

dylan456 2023-04-18

It has been three weeks, one reviewer has agreed to review, and five reviewers have not yet accepted the invitation.

大大马哥哥 2023-04-12

What is the result now?

大大马哥哥 2023-04-12

Does it mean to switch investments as long as it is a decision in process?

jsxzj 2023-04-11

I submitted it on March 6th, and there is no response now.

柳亦青 2023-04-10

3.15 submit
3.20 with editor
4.10 with editor
It has been almost a month, and there is no news. It has never been this slow before.

zhangsheng 2023-04-08

Impatient, it's useless. They said to keep waiting, not knowing if it will be faster or not.

ichou 2023-04-07

4.07 is currently being reviewed.