Verified Reviews - COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

alivio 2021-12-20

Hello, do other authors need to register with the system and then confirm after submission?

alivio 2021-12-20

Hello, after submitting the contribution, do other authors need to register the system and then confirm it via email?

ChakaBengMing 2021-12-20

I want to ask, is the journal you transferred to in the 4th quartile?

Moult 2021-12-19

Instant notification of transfer +1
Feels like creating momentum for the OA being transferred.

计算小菜鸡 2021-12-03

I am too, although it made me switch sides, but I really like this efficiency. If you want, then go for it; don't dawdle.

何夏树 2021-11-19

This is a hybrid journal, and the editors and reviewers are unaware of whether or not you choose open access before acceptance. After acceptance, you are also free to choose whether or not to go open access.

走散的晴天 2021-11-11

Submitted in June, underwent major revisions in September, with a total of five reviewers and over 50 questions. The major revisions took one month to complete and the second round of reviews came back in October, which were addressed within half a month. The third round of reviews took place in November and were addressed within one week. The acceptance was received close to the end of the month, as the review process was extremely stringent and the reviewers had many questions. The journal feels of high quality.

贝子浪浪 2021-10-27

Hi, is there any result? How is it going?

杨杨 2021-10-07

Also informed me to transfer, , , ,

ChakaBengMing 2021-09-24

Hello, may I ask if the document you sent is a non-OA article?

hjyai94 2021-09-24

I voted today, and I don't know what the results will be.

请把我的论文收了吧 2021-09-22

It's a bit embarrassing. I submitted it at 11 pm the previous night and received a message asking me to resubmit in the early morning of the next day.
Anyway, it's just fast.

Rambo555 2021-09-15

The speed is very fast, with results in one month, 7 days for modifications, 7 days for acceptance, and a total duration of one month and two weeks.

ccc999 2021-09-10

The journal review process is very fast, and the reviewers are meticulous and responsible. After submission, it is reviewed the next day, and the results are returned after two weeks, with the status changing to "reconsider after revision." After completing the revisions in one week, it is submitted again, and acceptance takes about two weeks. Let's cheer for the editors and reviewers! Save us anxious graduates!

foyo 2021-09-07

After submission, the editing will be immediately processed and reviewed externally after one day.
A major revision will be conducted after one month.
A week after the return, a major revision will be made for modifications.
A minor revision will be made a week after the return.
Acceptance will be made one day after the return.

梦儿 2021-07-27

May I ask if the author information needs to be erased in the initial draft of this journal?

小硕一枚哦哦哦 2021-07-27

Hey buddy, did you get a major overhaul?

稻荷化狐 2021-06-16

Not difficult, the main thing is that the model is innovative. Actually, just take a look at the above article and compare it, and you will roughly understand. However, this journal is very strict on the topic card! It is more like a medical journal than a bioinformatics journal, focusing on practicality, preferably with medical significance and practical significance. Because the editorial process is particularly fast, it is worth a try!

JillianWong 2021-06-16

Hello, I would like to ask if the journal requires a high level of innovation?

稻荷化狐 2021-06-13

The journal processing speed is very fast! Submitted on the same day, received by the editor a few hours later, and sent for review in 2 days! I searched on the Elsevier homepage for the total time from submission to acceptance, which is approximately within 3 months! I am very excited!

James23kn 2021-05-31

May I ask, which editing company did the author find?

沙雕外包放羊技校 2021-04-28

Submitted a paper on computer processing of medical signals.
1. The results will be available in May.
There were two reviewers who provided detailed review comments. One of them was somewhat negative.
The Editor-in-Chief (EIC) believed that the paper could still be salvaged and sent an email with the decision of rejection and resubmission.
It is still a challenging journal.

沙雕外包放羊技校 2021-03-25

Submitted a review article on computer-aided diagnosis. It took a little over a month to receive the reviewers' comments. There were three reviewers, and the questions were not too difficult. Spent 5 days making revisions and successfully accepted two days later.

DDDor1Mi 2021-01-20

One reviewer is proactive, two are average, and one is very sharp. And one of them submitted an empty review.

Submitted on November 6th.
On January 4th, it was recommended to transfer to another journal. The recommended journal was established in 2021, but the transfer was rejected.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started