咸菜36 2022-04-21

It's relatively fast. It took about thirty-something days for the review. The results just came out yesterday, and they gave a major revision. However, there was only one reviewer's opinion. I don't know if it's normal.

xgdw 2022-04-20

May I ask how long the review process has been?

咸菜36 2022-04-18

I became "Required Reviews Completed" on April 15th, I don't know how many more days it will take to receive a response.

hk_zheng 2022-04-17

2022.03.08 submitted
2022.03.09 with editor
2022.03.11 revision
2022.03.13 with editor
2022.03.21 under review
2022.04.12 Moderate revision
2022.04.15 with editor
2022.04.16 Accept

Translated into English:

2022.03.08 submitted
2022.03.09 with editor
2022.03.11 revision
2022.03.13 with editor
2022.03.21 under review
2022.04.12 Moderate revision
2022.04.15 with editor
2022.04.16 Accept

xgdw 2022-04-12

May I ask which special issue you submitted to? Does it take a month to change to "under review"?

Jimmy 'B-Rabbit' Smith 2022-04-07

En revisión

罗齐天大圣 2022-04-06

Excuse me, is the review process long? I just submitted a paper and it is currently under review 10 days later. Can you please share your experience?

㐒罩 2022-04-06

Will this journal be ranked in the first quartile this year as it scored 6 in the forecast?

zsy-ujs 2022-04-06

I also submitted a special edition, and it has been under review for nearly a month.

ERIC 2022-04-01

The special issue that I submitted, do we have to wait until the end of the time for all the articles to be reviewed together?

罗齐天大圣 2022-04-01

Me too, this status has not changed, is it because choosing non-OA processing is slower?

ERIC 2022-04-01

Why is it still "with editor" after nearly 20 days? Does anyone know?

还未收到意见 2022-03-29

Posted in October 2021, it has been 5 months since the submission, and it's too slow.

MadaoBu 2022-03-18

Last year, I secretly logged into the boss's email account, afraid that he would not check the emails and it would affect the copyright agreement and manuscript revisions. After I mentioned it to him once, he started checking the emails regularly and immediately forwarded journal updates to me... I'm not sure why the co-author couldn't see the status, I can't figure out why. Last year's submissions were all visible.

不完美的上帝 2022-03-18

Secretly looking at the boss's account... Sigh, I used my own account to submit it. The boss is in communication, and I have no connections left, my brothers. Do I need to frequently remind the boss to check the account in the future???

MadaoBu 2022-03-18

From the end of last year to March of this year, there have been three submissions for the project. Only one of them, where I am not the corresponding author, can I see the status. I can only secretly check my boss's account every day, feeling anxious.

不完美的上帝 2022-03-17

I just submitted my manuscript today as the first author, but it is not a communication. After submitting the manuscript, there is no record of submission, and I haven't received any email. What is going on? Can only the corresponding author see the submission record?

孤独 2022-02-28

Posted on October 22nd, returned for major revisions on December 20th, revised on January 29th, returned for minor revisions on February 18th, revised on February 23rd, and accepted on February 26th. Deputy Editor-in-Chief Yan-Fu Kuo's work efficiency is high.

forsakenw 2022-02-21

2021.08.30 submitted
2021.08.31 with editor
2021.09.05 Under Review
2021.09.20 Under Review
2021.10.23 Major Revision
2021.12.08 with editor
2021.12.10 Under Review
2022.01.08 Minor Revision
2022.01.15 with editor
2022.01.18 accept
My first and possibly last paper before graduation, I am very happy to share my experience with everyone.
The research direction is smart farming, and the reviewer's comments are very detailed. They basically cover grammar issues, but the main focus is on the need for sufficient experiments. They don't require the results to be excellent, as long as your arguments are detailed and supported enough. After the first major revision, there were two sets of reviewer comments. One of them mentioned that my "major issue is language," so I found a cheap proofreading service and made some revisions. After a few days, it was directly accepted.

generaljim 2022-02-08

Submission experience:
2021.7 submission
2021.10 major revision
2021.1 minor revision
2022.2 accept
Very good journal, the reviewers are particularly professional, and the suggestions they provided were very helpful.

generaljim 2022-02-08

2021.7 submission - Submission in July 2021
2021.10 major revision - Major revision in October 2021
2021.1 minor revision - Minor revision in January 2021
2022.2 accept - Accepted in February 2022
A very good journal, the reviewers are particularly professional, and their suggestions were very helpful.

大盘兔子吖 2021-12-14

Send a reminder letter. My paper has been under review for 3 and a half months. After sending the reminder letter, I received the reviewer's comments after half a month.

qdhuihdqoiwhoih 2021-12-08

The journal values the originality of the research content and whether the experimental evidence is sufficient. During the revision period, several additional experimental results were added. The questions raised by the reviewers were very professional and the revisions were helpful to improve the article. The review process was fast, and the Associate Editor was very proactive in helping to adjust the paper. Communication with him regarding any questions received quick replies. Overall, it was a very good submission experience.

Bosen 2021-12-02

First of all, the reviewers of this journal are very serious. If these two reviewers had not read the entire article, it would not have been possible for them to provide me with more than 50 suggestions for revisions, totaling over 3000 words in the review letter from both reviewers and the editor. Of course, this includes several major suggestions and dozens of grammar and logic-related ones. Secondly, I submitted the article at the end of October and received the review comments in early January, which was quite slow. However, the second review was faster and there were not many revision suggestions. Finally, it was accepted at the end of April. I was working on hyperspectral crops. Anyway, this journal has a relatively stable impact factor. I changed my research direction after my Ph.D. and didn't continue with agricultural remote sensing. I wish you all good luck.

MadaoBu 2021-11-28

Please check and respond to the following:
1) Are you aware of the revised scope of the journal?
2) The journal does not provide free copy editing. Has this manuscript been thoroughly edited and checked for correct English?
3) Have you followed the COMPAG Guide for Authors in preparing your manuscript?
4) Have you added line numbers to your manuscript?
5) Please mention if this paper has a part/companion submission.

What does the fifth point mean?

紫薇星君 2021-11-26

The translation of the text is: "It has been a month since submission and it is still in the 'with editor' status. The system indicates: Please note that Aries is aware that users are experiencing intermittent slowness while working in EM/PM. The Aries teams are working to identify the root cause and implement a fix. They are treating this with the highest priority and apologize for any inconvenience. What does this mean?"

yujipeng 2021-11-25

Hello, may I ask if there is a paper template available on the official website for submitting this journal? I couldn't find it.

三七二十 2021-11-22

Excuse me, is there any news now?

generaljim 2021-11-01

May I ask if the reminder email is sent through the submission system? Mine is as well. It has been almost 4 months and there is no news. It is an article on agricultural engineering and artificial intelligence. Thank you.

generaljim 2021-11-01

Submitted, it has been almost four months, still under review, no news yet.