Verified Reviews - Computers & Industrial Engineering
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

waterandsoil 2022-09-27

The first review process takes a long time, and the comments mainly focus on the innovation and experimentation. I hope the journal continues to improve.

BeCalm 2022-09-26

There will be a track system, which will display the number of reviewers: 2 or 2+.

12qwe 2022-09-21

How many reviewers are going to receive this?

Amiee1111 2022-09-20

I submitted my article on April 24th and it was sent for review approximately 20 days later. At that time, it was assigned to 3+ reviewers. I waited for over two months without any reviewer accepting the invitation. Afterward, I sent a reminder email to the editorial department. Three days later, the tracking record showed that only one reviewer accepted the invitation. On September 17th, it was indicated that this reviewer had completed the review, but the status in the system still remained as "under review," and I am not sure what the situation is.

C49115487 2022-09-12

Depending on the editor's mood, it would be considered. If the editor thinks it's acceptable, then it's possible to add new reviewers. Otherwise, it may be rejected.

BeCalm 2022-09-11

This journal is a very conventional industrial engineering journal. Although it cannot compare to EJOR, it is still a reputable journal!

BeCalm 2022-09-07

This journal has a review period of two months for reviewers, which is relatively slow.

cyyym 2022-09-03

I waited for 4 months after the completion of my first draft for the results.

GVW 2022-09-03

Hey guys, can you send me the submission guidelines for this journal? I can't access the journal's website, and changing multiple browsers didn't solve the issue.

LWBLL 2022-09-02

The person who is waiting is getting anxious. The editorial department is taking so long to handle the review comments.

幸运儿bling 2022-08-31

Excuse me, everyone. I would like to ask for your opinion. After the first round of review, the second reviewer rejected my article (out of a total of 3 reviewers). I have been waiting for a long time for the second round of review, but they still rejected it. One reviewer agreed, and another had some issues. In this situation, what are the chances of the article being accepted? Has anyone experienced a similar situation?

zuhx 2022-08-27

Be patient, I have a paper that will be returned after waiting for a month.

LWBLL 2022-08-27

I submitted a paper in mid-May, and by early August, it showed that the required review comments had been completed. However, it has been almost a month now, and the status has not changed. Has anyone else encountered this situation? Should I send an email to the editor to inquire about it?

zuhx 2022-08-07

I would like to ask everyone for advice. I have a second round of revisions for a paper, and I have submitted it for reevaluation (only to one reviewer). It has been four days since the submission, but the reviewer has not accepted the reevaluation. What should I do in this situation?

cyyym 2022-08-05

I hope mine will also return as soon as possible. It has been three months since it left, and I am anxiously waiting.

zuhx 2022-08-03

I have a similar experience as you. The second round of review took three months, and there was a reviewer who didn't review the manuscript the whole time. In the end, the editor made a decision and asked for a second round of revisions.

cyyym 2022-08-03

Oh my, you're so fast. Mine has already been sent back for 3 months without any results.

zuhx 2022-07-29

Submission date: 22.3.22
First revision: 22.6.1 (Two reviewers, major revision and minor revision)
Revision date: 22.6.22
Acceptance date: 22.7.28
The overall process is fast, but the speed of submission depends on luck.

linmuxi 2022-07-23

Hello, may I ask for the website to check the status of the manuscript? Do I need to apply to the editorial department or can I check directly?

zuhx 2022-07-06

Not yet, still waiting.

幸运儿bling 2022-07-06

Excuse me, did the original poster receive any feedback? My situation is very similar to yours. I don't know about the third reviewer's situation. Does the editor have to keep waiting?

zuhx 2022-07-05

Just asking the experienced ones, how long does it usually take to get results for a rework? I sent it for rework in mid-April this year, and there is still one reviewer who hasn't finished reviewing it yet.

zuhx 2022-07-01

I feel very hopeful about reaching the top in the next two years.

论文暴击者 2022-07-01

A very good journal, double-blind review, fair and just, non-discriminatory, speaking based on merit, aiming to enter the top journal is a must.

当然是accept啦 2022-06-30

Comments:
For the initial submission, please make sure to cite all the tables provided in the manuscript within the text.
How should I modify it?

zuhx 2022-06-13

Congratulations, may I ask how long it will take to receive it after repair?

麓山 2022-06-13

After revising, the review process is very standardized, with 3-4 reviewers who are meticulous and serious. There are requirements for workload, innovation, and complexity. It is a very good journal.

长风有时 2022-06-10

with editor generally takes around 1 week to 20 days, while external review for me always takes around 40 days, which should be following the journal's deadline of 6 weeks. Don't ask me how I know, the answer is referee!

zuhx 2022-06-02

Update, the article submitted at the end of March for June 1st retreat and major revision.

劲茵 2022-05-27

The mentor and senior peers thought it was a minor revision, so they did not ask for any additional or modified experiments. They only inquired about the origins of several concepts, formulas, and the numerical values, as well as grammar-related issues.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now