Verified Reviews - Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

lycutter 2023-03-27

It has been over a month since my submission to the journal, waiting for the editor's response. It's too slow.

wwwwac 2023-03-27

How long has your minor repair been under review?

wwwwac 2023-03-27

How long has your application been under review after the minor edits?

两个水母 2023-03-24

Hehehe. Normally eat meals.

Hui 2023-03-24

May I ask how long it took for your article to go from submission to under review? It has been a month for mine, and it is still with the editor.

lycutter 2023-03-23

Posted for 5 months, rejected due to insufficient number of reviewers found. It is unclear how many reviewers were actually found, how many were lacking, and what specific feedback was given. I will not submit to this journal in the future.

James Wu 2023-03-22

I am also a small editor who went missing. Now it has been two months and still under review.

chan 2023-02-17

Feb 01, 2023 Received a rejection with the option to resubmit. Only one reviewer, no significant academic feedback, just mentioned that the English was poor, suspecting it might not have been reviewed and directly given the option to resubmit.

Feb 16, 2023 Used a proofreading service in Evansville to polish the article and resubmitted it.

292725651 2023-02-11

I just sent it to the official Elsevier, I don't know if there is any customer service.

292725651 2023-02-11

I think if you haven't reminded before, you can give a gentle reminder. But if you have reminded multiple times, it's better not to remind again. It's not fun to anger someone.

292725651 2023-02-10

The minor revisions were submitted on October 4th and accepted on November 10th. During this period, one of the reviewers lost their feedback. The other reviewer's opinion was to accept the revisions. The editor only received this one opinion and accepted the revisions without requesting further modifications.

AAAAA 2023-01-17

2021.11.2 submitted
2021.12.1 under review
2022.3.4 major revision
2022.4.14 resubmitted
2022.8.18 major revision - Added another reviewer due to one reviewer not reviewing.
2022.9.12 resubmitted
2022.12.21 minor revision - Added another reviewer due to one reviewer not reviewing.
2023.1.4 resubmitted

Currently, there is no news after the revision. I don't know when it will be finished.

chan 2023-01-05

Dec 18, 2022, Submission
Jan 04, 2023, With Editor

lycutter 2022-11-18

Submitted on November 3rd, and still submitted to the journal on the 18th. Is there anything slower? Does the journal need to notify each author for confirmation?

MizuotoAsuka 2022-11-14

My submission on 10-17, with editor on 10-31, and now it has been another half month, but there has been no change...
Does it feel strict in the review process? Will the follow-up be quick?

冫风格 2022-11-09

After submission, the manuscript stayed in the editor's hands for over a month before going under review. The process went relatively smoothly afterwards, taking 3-4 months for the first review, mainly due to difficulties in finding reviewers. The major revisions were given a deadline of 3 weeks, and after the revisions were submitted, it was accepted within a week.

292725651 2022-11-09

Another junior editor has gone missing, and it took a total of more than 9 months to finally receive it.

刘泰维 2022-11-08

Approximately 18 days, the editorial department sent the abstract back for revisions. After submission, it took more than half a day with the editor, and another half a day under review. The speed is quite impressive.

刘泰维 2022-11-05

Article number 2859, is the submission volume really that high? It has been over 10 days and it's still submitted to the journal.

X11111111111111111111111111111 2022-10-23

There is a process after the manuscript is reviewed, which takes a few days.

houj 2022-10-18

Is there a "decision in process" stage after "under review"?

小呆 2022-10-08

I gave up and got rejected by the editor in just five or six days. ?

292725651 2022-09-21

The journal quality is good, but it is too, too, too slow.
Submitted on February 1, major revision on April 21, and it's still ongoing.

The second round of review was submitted on June 16, but we couldn't find a reviewer. I couldn't bear it anymore and sent a reminder on September 6, and the reviewer started reviewing on the 8th. All the review comments were collected, but the editor didn't process them. I couldn't bear it anymore and reminded them again on the 20th, and the minor revision was done on the 21st. Wow, the second round of review took over 3 months. They won't move unless I remind them.

X11111111111111111111111111111 2022-09-06

The journal is great, and the editors and reviewers are very diligent and responsible. The reviewers' questions are very professional, as long as you answer them seriously and do not evade the questions. In addition, the processing time for articles after acceptance is very fast.

2022.4.7 Submitted
2022.4.27 Under review
2022.7.7 Major revision
2022.7.27 Submitted after revisions
2022.8.23 Accepted
2022.8.23 Accepted
2022.8.28 Article published online

艾蕾小天使! 2022-08-29

August 20, 2022 - Submitted to Journal
September 11, 2022 - with editor
September 13, 2022 - under review
September 29, 2022 - under review
In January, a review was requested.
February 26, 2023 - required reviewers completed
March 17, 2023 - minor revision
April 15, 2023 - with editor
April 18, 2023 - accept

mu@* 2022-08-17

May I ask what was the reason for your rejection? Was it because you didn't meet the requirements of the journal?

Shuo Wang 2022-08-06

It has been two weeks with the editor, and it hasn't been reviewed yet. I don't know if it's a slow process or if there is no opportunity. It's really strange.

Shuo Wang 2022-07-25

Did you get any results after using your with editor?

houj 2022-07-15

May I ask if there are any results yet? How long after will it be submitted for review?

youwan 2022-07-11

6.9 Submission submitted to journal
7.11 Journal number assigned,
The journal number was directly rejected within one minute of being assigned, without even reading the paper. Personally, I suggest not submitting to this journal as it feels very irresponsible and a waste of time.

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now