Verified Reviews - COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

名字好难起 2021-12-22

You can combine several pictures into one image, such as 1a, 1b, or you can appropriately delete some parts. You can also put unimportant content in the supporting materials. It shouldn't be a problem if the page count exceeds slightly.

dougj 2021-12-21

The feeling of reducing the size of the pictures cannot reach 25 pages, so basically all of them are main text content, and it is not suitable to put them in the appendix.

dudupipi 2021-12-21

Personal Experience, the submission should not exceed 25 pages, the revised version should not exceed 27 pages. Extra content can be placed in the appendix or reduce the size of the images.

dudupipi 2021-12-21

12.20 Required review completed.

dougj 2021-12-17

Want to submit to CST, but the total number of pages of the manuscript exceeds 25 pages with 12-point font and double spacing. I want to know if it is possible to submit and if there is any way to reduce the number of pages.

dudupipi 2021-12-13

11.10 submitted
11.12 with editor
11.21 under review
11.22 under review

Translation:
11.10 submitted
11.12 with editor
11.21 under review
11.22 under review

努力努力最努力 2021-12-06

Okay, I've been stuck in the RRC for a few days now, still unable to make a decision, feeling anxious and fearful.

dudupipi 2021-12-06

If the journal requires opinions from at least two reviewers, then "required reviews completed" indicates that two reviewers have already submitted their opinions. Maintaining this status while the time is changing indicates that additional reviewers have also submitted their opinions subsequently.

努力努力最努力 2021-12-06

May I ask why the time for "required reviews completed" changes, but the status remains the same? I have been waiting for a long time, and the editor has not made a decision yet...

Stephen_He 2021-11-15

Composites Science and Technology
Editor: L. E. Asp
09/Apr/2021: Submitted
12/Apr/2021: With Editor
12/Apr/2021: Under Review
14/Jun/2021: Major revision
23/Jul/2021: Revised
24/Jul/2021: Under review
02/Sep/2021: Minor revision
13/Sep/2021: Revised
14/Sep/2021: Under Review
01/Oct/2021: Under Review
05/Nov/2021: Required Reviews Completed
06/Nov/2021: Accept

ZBJLZC 2021-11-12

It took 4 months, although it was really slow, but I am very honored that the article can be published in this journal. Grateful.

forgotself 2021-09-30

Material bias, but the primary focus is on its application in structural engineering; therefore, the main emphasis is on mechanical performance, but damage mechanism research should also be considered. Finite element simulation is used concurrently, suggesting that the editor may be interested in interdisciplinary studies.

少侠好轻功 2021-09-27

Mar 01, Submitted
Apr 09, Decision-Major Revision
Jun 15, Re-submitted
Jul 12, Accepted
Jul 15, Online
Leif Asp is a very good editor.
The reviewer's comments were very sharp. Thank you for the guidance.
A very meaningful debut.
Good luck to everyone.

2021-09-16

4/3投稿 - Submitted on 4/3
6/22大修返回 - Returned after major repairs on 6/22
7/21接收 - Received on 7/21

钱伟端 2021-09-09

The deputy editor is very friendly.

Cage Sun 2021-08-29

Excuse me, are you working in structural engineering or materials science? I saw that there are articles related to structural engineering in this journal, but I'm still a bit hesitant to submit my work!

xyzh 2021-08-13

OP, have you come up with a result?

Marcoxu 2021-07-29

2021.1.19 submit
2021.4.21 major
2021.5.28 re-submit
2021.7.8 minor
2021.7.12 re-submit
2021.7.20 accepted
2021.7.28 online

4 reviewers, the review process was a bit slow, but one of the reviewers was very enthusiastic and provided many detailed and constructive suggestions for revisions. The final version of the paper is much better than the initial one! Many thanks to Editor Prof. Quaresimin. We had a meeting before due to institutional collaboration, but I couldn't understand him well at that time because of his strong Italian accent. I wonder if he still remembers me during the review process...

forgotself 2021-07-19

03 Feb, 2021 Submitted & with editor
25 Feb, 2021 Under review
12 Jun, 2021 Major consideration
05 Jul, 2021 Resubmitted
18 Jul, 2021 Accept

For a total of five and a half months, I received the first round of comments after over four months. Due to the interdisciplinary nature of the study, five reviewers were assigned, but I only received comments from one reviewer. They pointed out a few minor issues, which I believe were not sent for further review.

I speculate that this reviewer is an expert in the field, and the editor explained the reason for the slow review process: difficulty in finding reviewers.

It was my first submission, and I managed to hold back from requesting updates. I would like to express my gratitude to the regional editor, Marino Quaresimin.

The process was not short, but the outcome is satisfactory!

luomu 2021-07-07

Posted on 2021.03.28, immediately Under Review, took about two days;
Then came the long wait until 2021.0604, couldn't wait any longer, sent an email inquiring about the status of the manuscript, received a reply the next day, stating that there was only one review opinion and had to wait;
One week later, on 2021.0615, Required Reviews Completed, and ten days later, sent a second email inquiring about the status, received a reply in the evening stating that it would be processed as soon as possible, and indeed received major revisions the next morning at 10 o'clock;
Two reviewers, a total of 12 comments, took 4 days, 2500+ words,
Submitted on 2021.0630, immediately with editor
Under Review on 2021.0703
Required Reviews Completed on 2021.0704
Accepted on 2021.0706
Took a total of over 3 months and a few days. The attitude of the editor felt very good, and they responded politely when I emailed them. After all, understanding is key in the face of the impact of the epidemic!

luomu 2021-07-06

May I ask who is the editor?

luomu 2021-07-06

May I ask how long it takes for Accept to accept the final required reviews completed?

Stephen_He 2021-07-06

Composites Science and Technology Editor: Karl Schulte
19/Apr/2021: Submit to journal
19/Apr/2021: With Editor
24/Apr/2021: Under Review
03/May/2021: Required Reviews Completed
15/May/2021: Required Reviews Completed
18/May/2021: Major revision
14/Jun/2021: Under Review
15/Jun/2021: Required Reviews Completed
05/Jul/2021: Accept

Translated text:
Composites Science and Technology Editor: Karl Schulte
19/Apr/2021: Submitted to journal
19/Apr/2021: Under review by the editor
24/Apr/2021: Under review
03/May/2021: Required reviews completed
15/May/2021: Required reviews completed
18/May/2021: Major revision required
14/Jun/2021: Under review
15/Jun/2021: Required reviews completed
05/Jul/2021: Accepted

WUHU~ 2021-06-29

Already successfully accepted. It took 3 months. I am still very honored to have my work published in CST.

luomu 2021-06-25

Do you have the latest results? Share them~~

luomu 2021-06-25

May I ask how many reviewers are there for the first review in four months?

WUHU~ 2021-06-04

Required Reviews Completed for three weeks. Hope to pass.

名字好难起 2021-06-02

It has been a month and a half, and still with the editor. I wrote a reminder letter but there's still no response. It's very awkward, like being caught in a dilemma. It's so slow.

Monroe1994 2021-06-01

Although it took 6 months, I submitted during the Chinese New Year. It took 4 months to receive the review comments, but I am already very happy with the good result of the first article. I want to share my submission journey and wish everyone the best of luck.

Submission: 20201130
Under review: 20201209-20210119-20210227 (kept changing, but no news)
Required Reviews Completed: 20210305
Revision, Major Revision: 20210309-0508 for required revisions
Revised comments to editor: With Editor 20210328
Revised with reviewers: Under review 20210402
Required Reviews Completed: 20210427
Second revision, Minor revision: 20210501-0630 for required revisions
Revised comments to editor: With Editor 20210525
Accepted: 20210531 - the best gift for Children's Day!

WUHU~ 2021-05-31

The manuscript has been under review for over a month. Required reviews have been completed for two weeks. Hopefully, the outcome of the waiting is good!!!

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search