Yuan9e 2022-09-19

2022.7.11 with editor;
2022.7.13 under review;
2022.7.30 under review (changed status once, as informed by the Aesville customer service: the editor sent it to 5 reviewers, but only 2 agreed to review it, and one of them did not reply, so on the 30th, the editor invited a few more reviewers);
2022.8.14 major revision;
2022.9.7 with editor;
2022.9.19 accept.
The editor is Joong Hee Lee, a member of the Korean Academy of Science and Engineering, and the efficiency is very high. Generally, when submitted on the first day, it is under review by the second day. Hoping for continuous improvement.

DDWB 2022-09-18

I remember a long time ago when we all discussed this issue. If you really like this magazine, I suggest paying attention to its basic parameters, which are clearly stated on the homepage:
Time to First Decision, 2.4 weeks.
This 2.4 weeks should be an average value, within a little over 20 days, which is normal. There is no need to curse others for editing the COVID-19 pandemic (at least I think this approach is extreme). So, it's okay to make a little fun and give them advice by directly writing a letter to the editor-in-chief.

小小小不点 2022-09-18

My situation is the same, it's so slow! @DDWE, it's only natural for people to complain when it's this slow, isn't your comment also an attack? Is sarcasm considered normal language?

DDWB 2022-09-18

Oh, I read it wrong. It dipped on the 28th. That's a slight delay. I suggest you directly write a letter to the editor, but there's no need to attack anyone.

DDWB 2022-09-18

I now have a rough understanding of their process. This type of rejection is usually because the processing editor rejected it, but the editor and editorial department will confirm the decision again. If there is no doubt, they will reject it. There are only 5 days left, so there is no need to rush and attack other editors. Journals with dedicated editorial teams, including top journals, have a normal initial review time of 1-2 weeks, let alone these editors who are not full-time and are doing voluntary work. All I can say is, brother, there is no need for it...

DDWB 2022-09-18

Brother, I suggest you start your own journal. Submit on the same day, review on the same day, accept on the same day, and publish online on the same day, haha.

DistinctMan 2022-09-18

Directly dip, still waiting for so long, too frustrating.

wcandxo 2022-09-17

Did the brothers dip directly after the under review process?

tuanzi 2022-09-17

9.8 submitted
9.9 with editor
9.17 under review

Translation:
9.8 submitted
9.9 with editor
9.17 under review

DistinctMan 2022-09-17

8.23 Submission
8.28 Decision in process until now
I sent two reminder emails in between, but they were useless. Has the editor been hospitalized with COVID-19? It hasn't been reviewed yet, please return it quickly, don't waste time.

tuanzi 2022-09-08

Basically, it is almost certain to be rejected soon.

任小肖 2022-09-07

May I ask how things turned out for the original poster? How did the submission become "Decision in Process" right after being submitted?

wt20211029 2022-09-06

Rejected, three alternative journals were suggested, luckily it was not rejected after being reviewed, damn it, it's a bit difficult to write a paper on a random topic now.

wt20211029 2022-08-25

Just submitted one, won an award last year, now feeling more and more stressed, hoping this one will go smoothly too.

科研小白 2022-08-25

Four reviewers, opinions are okay, should be two minor revisions and one major revision, one doesn't know, directly rejected, without even the opportunity to revise.

红妆杨柳岸 2022-08-23

The journal review process is very prompt.
Submitted on May 15th.
With editor on May 17th.
Under review on May 20th.
Major revision on June 14th.
Revised on July 4th.
Accepted on August 4th.
Online on August 18th.

哆啦A梦12345 2022-08-23

2022-5-10 Submission
2022-6-14 Major revision, one-month deadline, 6 reviewers.
There were forty to fifty very professional suggestions, not including several dozen grammar issues that were also corrected.
2022-7-12 Revised, added a large number of experiments and theories.
2022-8-17 Minor revision, one-month deadline.
2022-8-19 Revised.
2022-08-23 Accepted
Edited by Wang Hao, very professional. The impression is that each "with editor" stage did not exceed 7 days, and there were also stages like "under review" and "decision in process." The journal is very standardized, so the speed mainly depends on the review progress.

wcandxo 2022-08-20

Brother, is your manuscript within 20 pages and does it include icons, with double line spacing?

oldt 2022-08-18

How is the situation now? I have been with the editor for a month already.

号号 2022-08-11

The status has not changed since July 31st with the editor. What's going on? Does everyone know about this? Thank you.

tuanzi 2022-08-10

The editor should remind once every half a month.

磐石 2022-08-09

Will the editor urge the reviewer if the reviewer has been accepting the review for more than a month without providing feedback?

pc-co 2022-07-29

Submitted for review for 20 days but no reviewer accepted the review.

tuanzi 2022-07-27

under review directly turned into major revision, there is no decision in progress.

是棵树 2022-07-21

I want to ask if the original poster's status changed directly to "modification" after the first review, without appearing as "decision in process".

是棵树 2022-07-21

Will it be a tragedy if "under review" directly changes to "decision in process" after one month? I've seen others say it changes to "completed review."

pc-co 2022-07-21

"With editor, it quickly becomes a decision, with a rejection probability close to 100%."

小李的栗子 2022-07-19

Hello, may I ask if the problem has been resolved? I have also encountered a similar problem and am seeking a solution. Thank you for your trouble.

小李的栗子 2022-07-19

Hello. May I ask how many pages your manuscript is approximately?

小李的栗子 2022-07-19

Hello, I would like to ask about the submission format. Waiting online, QQ2774255376. Thank you.