Verified Reviews - COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

小曹同学 2022-12-03

Several reviewers, if one person rejects the submission, does it mean that there is basically no hope? Thank you.

tuanzi 2022-12-03

No decision in progress.

爱吃鱼骨头的猫ing 2022-12-02

Excuse me, does the original poster have the "decision in process" status?

爱吃鱼骨头的猫ing 2022-12-02

This dip status is definitely going to be rejected, right? Me too, it has been several days. I'm going.

爱吃鱼骨头的猫ing 2022-12-02

Not yet, it's in a dip state now, it has been several days.

爱吃鱼骨头的猫ing 2022-12-02

Now in a dip state, it has been several days and I don't know if it's a rejection or not.

不知道该叫什么 2022-12-02

How is the original poster doing? Mine is also with the editor.

qiuyijun 2022-11-30

Mine too, it has been 12 days and it has been with the editor all along. I don't know if they are looking for a reviewer.

爱吃鱼骨头的猫ing 2022-11-25

May I ask if the status remains the same even though the date has changed in the "with editor" stage? Does it mean that the submission will be rejected?

爱吃鱼骨头的猫ing 2022-11-25

Did you submit it for review in the end? Mine also had a change in the middle date, and the status has been "with editor" all along.

爱吃鱼骨头的猫ing 2022-11-25

Did you finally submit it for review? Mine also had the date changed in the middle, and the status is still with the editor.

Yaping 2022-11-24

I have been waiting for over a week, but there has been no response from the editor. I feel like either they should hurry up and review it, or reject it quickly. It's too annoying to be left hanging like this...

bigtree 2022-11-24

Refused recommendations and switched to four paid journals, some of which I have never even heard of. A bit vicious.

vitrimers 2022-11-21

Can only say that this journal is indeed a bit disgusting.

bigtree 2022-11-21

It has been four days and I haven't received a rejection notice yet. The decision process is dragging on too slowly.

vitrimers 2022-11-21

Submitted for half a month with the editor, then decision in process, finally rejected ten days later. Is their mind not functioning properly? This is the first time I've seen a journal in this area being so indecisive. If they want to reject it, why waste time? Let us quickly find another place.

小曹同学 2022-11-18

Several reviewers, thank you.

八戒哥哥 2022-11-16

投CEJ转投过来的
9.28submit
10.1 under review
10.12 major revision
11.10 resubmit
11.16 accept
Thank you to editor Joong Hee Lee
Wishing the journal continued success!

小曹同学 2022-11-04

How long did it take to get rejected with the editor? It has been a week with mine, thank you.

小曹同学 2022-11-04

Hello, how did your results turn out? Thank you.

undefined 2022-10-27

Hello, may I ask if Part B requires British English or American English?

gdcriwul 2022-10-23

The second day of submission with the editor, it became "decision in process" on the third day. Does this mean it was rejected without being sent for review? Or does this status indicate that it may still be sent for review later?

DDWB 2022-10-17

There should be no problem breaking through 13. I remember that recently the "Material Strategy" official account released the latest instant Impact Factor (IF) of engineering and technology journals. The completion rate of Part B's IF is over 70%, reaching 8.5. The estimated IF for next year will be the current instant IF divided by 0.5 to 0.6, which is worth looking forward to.

DDWB 2022-10-17

OP@号号7.31-8.11 with editor is normal, right?
The above@oldt hasn't received any news for a month with editor, so I suggest directly writing a letter to the editor-in-chief to inquire.

Collby 2022-10-14

What is the current outcome now?

DDWB 2022-09-26

It could also be a good thing, for example, if the reviewer quickly submits their review comments.

xin6690 2022-09-25

Hello, have you experienced many cases of transitioning from "in peer review" to "with editor"? Does this mean rejection within less than 20 days?

慕阳 2022-09-25

2022.7.10 with editor;
2022.7.14 under review;
2022.8.14 major revision;
2022.9.7 with editor;
2022.9.11 consideration in process;
2022.9.25 accept.

The journal's reviewing process is very fast, and the efficiency of the editors is high. It is recommended to focus on the characterization and mechanism analysis of the materials. I hope that the journal's impact factor can break through 13 next year.

Roy991030 2022-09-22

From AFM and AHM, all the way to part b, it took six months. The first round of review comments came back in about 45 days, requiring major revisions. After returning with the revised manuscript, the editor-in-chief missed one of the comments, so it only required minor revisions. The manuscript was sent back for the second time and received an acceptance letter after 10 days.

做最好的自己123 2022-09-21

Indeed, this journal is quite fast! There is a high probability that it will develop in the direction of the CEJ journal. It should be a very promising journal, and I believe its impact factor will increase significantly!

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started