zhangfeizhi 2023-04-17

At least 3 in general.

任小肖 2023-04-17

How many reviewers does Composites Part B usually have? The editor invited many people, but only two accepted. After that, the editor did not invite anyone else.

DDWB 2023-04-16

Are there any strict restrictions? Generally speaking, it's about 10 pages after publication (can be longer or shorter), corresponding to approximately 6000-7000 words in word document word count.

DDWB 2023-04-16

If the time is too long, reminders have to be sent to collect.

MiMi李 2023-04-14

Excuse me, have you solved the problem? I am also in the same situation. I sent the edited document to 9 people, but only one person accepted the review. It took 25 days to complete the review, but until now, no one has accepted the article for publication. I know someone who had a similar situation for a year and had to urge the editor before it was dealt with. Now, I don't know if I should urge them.

Lalala_2022 2023-04-12

Posted on November 30th, there has only been one reviewer's feedback so far, and the editor has not been urging... Initially, the review process for part B was very fast, but since 2022, both the submission and review process have noticeably slowed down a lot. Hopefully, it won't continue like this.

鲤鱼王desu 2023-04-10

The formatting requirements for this journal are double-spacing, single column, and 20 pages. Why do the ones I see exceed this quantity by far? Did I misunderstand something? Can someone please explain it to me?

最美女院士 2023-04-05

Hello, where can I see the completed reviews?

Taylor26 2023-04-04

03.01 Reviews completed: 2
And it has been a month and still waiting for the final reviewer ?

DDWB 2023-04-01

It is possible to have editor status for 1-2 weeks.

DDWB 2023-04-01

Just write a letter directly to the editor to inquire.

dudupipi 2023-03-30

Another half month has passed, the status is still 2.13-RRC, and five opinions have already been received.

大哥快跑！ 2023-03-30

Is it basically useless if it has been more than 1 week in editing and the status hasn't changed?

dudupipi 2023-03-16

1.13 Submit
1.18 Under review
2.09-2.13 Multiple RRCs
It has been over a month since the most recent RRC, and Elsevier customer service replied that they have received comments from five reviewers. The editor has not made a decision yet. 0.0

LDT 2023-03-13

3.10 submit
3.12 dip
3.13 Suggestion Transfer

7415 2023-03-06

The editor sent a social email to the corresponding author, which includes the website for tracking the journal submission.

dtyz11 2023-03-05

My only shows "under review". Can I see a more detailed progress?

7415 2023-03-04

Can't the submission tracking service webpage show the progress of several reviewers' reviews?

dudupipi 2023-03-02

Appealed before, at that time the scientific editor sent a rejection letter, it should be from a recently graduated doctoral student who just started working. Later, I sent an appeal email to the editor-in-chief and associate editor, and received a response after about a month, disagreeing with the appeal and respecting the decision of the reviewer.

DDWB 2023-03-01

Generally, it is common to directly respond to rejection emails.

I used to file appeals before, but now I have changed my mindset and realized that it is unnecessary.

DDWB 2023-03-01

Not coming for a few days, I see a lot of criticism, what's going on?
I specifically browsed the latest issue, from submission to online publication time, except for 2 articles that are close to 6 months, most articles are still 2-3 months, it seems normal.

lp刘鹏 2023-03-01

Are there any friends who have written an appeal letter after being rejected? Is the appeal letter sent to the chief editor or the editor who replied to oneself?

dudupipi 2023-02-28

My RRC status has changed several times, and the latest change has been for over half a month until today. The editor has not made a decision yet, and customer service has already returned with five review comments.

dtyz11 2023-02-28

The review speed of the journal is really slow. It has been five months and it is still under review, and the result is still unknown. I suggest being cautious when submitting papers, especially for those who are in a hurry to graduate.

SCI期刊审稿人 2023-02-22

Why are the comments on my accepted articles being disliked by dozens of people?

张燃zZ 2023-02-21

2022.8.12 submit
2022.8.13 with editor
2022.9.13 under review
2022.11.28 major revision given one month
2022.12.26 submit revised manuscript
2023.1.30 under review
2023.2.21 review complete

网志 2023-02-21

It's quite delayed, I don't recommend investing. If there are connections that can expedite it and are not refused, it is possible.

SCUTWG 2023-02-16

It is indeed rubbish. After submitting it, it took more than a month with the editor. I sent an email asking the editor, and the result was just rejection. I'm really speechless.

Gzq1 2023-02-09

Miscellaneous journals, it takes more than two months to reject a submission, and they won't even send it for review. If your submission is rejected, you have to send reminder letters several times before they respond. There is an uproar of criticism underneath!

Gzq1 2023-02-03

Really rare to see, this journal is simply speechless. Submitted and became "with editor" the next day, and it stayed in this status for 2 months. Urged once, they said my submission was not forgotten and the editor was processing it, waited another week, still "with editor". Finally urged again, and the result is a dip, probably a rejection. Is this really something a human does? It's dragging you to death! Be cautious when submitting to this journal, I have seen many similar feedback, extremely slow! I really don't recommend submitting to this journal! Remember, remember, remember!!!