yigou 2021-10-19

The first one was fast, but the second one is very slow. It was submitted on September 23rd, reviewed by the editor on September 25th, and there has been no update until October 19th.

Maxmuse 2021-10-16

Everyone says it's fast, but I haven't experienced it. Submitted on 9.28, reviewed by the editor on 10.1, and there has been no change until 10.16.

Wei~ 2021-10-14

September 28th, the second revision was made due to a reviewer who had been rejecting the manuscript since the beginning.
On October 11th, the revised manuscript from the second revision was returned, and the advisor asked the reviewer to respond, as they believed the suggestions were somewhat unrealistic.
On October 13th, the editor accepted it directly.

发条冬瓜 2021-10-12

July 3rd - Submitted
August 19th - Received feedback, no clear instructions for minor or major revisions, 21-day revision deadline (there was a delay due to grammar polishing)
September 5th - Returned revised draft
September 10th - Still no further changes since the RRC (Reviewer's Comment and Correction), it has been over a month. At the 30-day mark, I consulted customer service through chat, and they said there is only one reviewer and the feedback has been given. It seems like the editor is too busy, I don't know how much longer I have to wait. If I don't receive any news after 2 months, I plan to inquire through internal messaging.

hchhchch 2021-10-08

Hello, may I ask if there is any news about your article now?

魁拔元年 2021-10-06

Made of superhydrophobic mesh, it is used for oil-water separation. Submitted on August 14th, received reviewer's comments on September 18th, returned with revisions on October 2nd, and received acceptance from editor Romain Bordes on October 6th. The process felt very smooth.

hahaha666999 2021-10-04

7.28 Submission
8.23 Return of review comments (two reviewers, very professional questions, requested to return within 21 days)
9.3 Resubmission (resubmitted early, stayed under review until 9.21)
10.1 Acceptance

小Wei同学 2021-09-24

Posted on July 23rd
Submitted for review on July 25th
Received reviewer comments on August 20th, 17 questions from 3 reviewers, requested to return in 21 days
Returned revised manuscript on September 8th
Second round of review on September 10th
Half a month has passed, and there is still no result from the second round of review. It feels like there will be more revisions.

555111222 2021-09-21

I have always disliked the editors in my country. This time, when I saw that the one in Beijing with the surname Yan was getting close, I chose him, but the submission didn't get reviewed. Later, I submitted to a prestigious journal and it was accepted in just over two months. There were three reviewers, and their opinions were all very positive.

翊 2021-09-15

2021/7/31 Submission
2021/8/25 Modification
2021/9/2 Return
2021/9/4 Modification
2021/9/9 Return
2021/9/11 Acceptance
Edit: Nice, I hope the journal will continue to improve. Everyone is welcome to submit actively.

小Wei同学 2021-09-03

Did you submit it for review again after receiving the comments?

小Wei同学 2021-09-03

Did you submit it for review after making the revisions? Or did the editor confirm it directly?

zibiao 2021-08-24

July 8th - Submission
July 12th - Under review
August 15th - Received revision comments
August 20th - Revised manuscript returned
August 23rd - Accepted

孟德斯鸠 2021-08-24

Hello! Who is your editor-in-chief? Has it been re-examined after the repair? Thank you.

yigou 2021-08-24

The manuscript processing is very fast.
June 2nd - Submission
July 30th - Minor revision
August 16th - Major revision
August 21st - Acceptance
The editing is very prompt.

不知先生 2021-08-14

Did the original poster submit it for review again after repair?

lafinner 2021-08-05

May 29, 2021 Submission
July 2, 2021 Four reviewers, one of them is the editor. The questions were not too sharp, but the grammar was poor. The editor gave an opportunity for revision instead of rejecting it directly. Thank you~
July 21, 2021 Revision
August 5, 2021 Acceptance
Overall, a little over two months, which is considered quite fast. The editor was very nice. Thanks to Editor-in-Chief Romain Bordes.

XCY 2021-07-21

2021.05.28 Submission
2021.07.02 Two reviewers, minor revisions, requested 21 days to revise
2021.07.05 Resubmission
2021.07.20 Acceptance
Feels so fast~~

科研小白.. 2021-07-16

Submitted on May 21st and accepted on July 1st, the journal requires submitted papers to have a certain level of innovation. With two reviewers, both of whom ask very professional questions, it is a journal with extremely high efficiency.

孟德斯鸠 2021-07-12

Hello, how long did it take for the editing suggestions to be made after your review was completed?

奋斗的小鸟 2021-07-12

4.16 submitted
6.22 revised
7.8 resubmitted minor revisions
7.9 accepted

The second submission to this journal was still quite efficient. However, the review comments took a bit longer to come back this time. The editor mentioned in an email that they were waiting for the reviewers' feedback, which caused a delay. After making the revisions, coincidentally, I am someone who tends to procrastinate, so the process was further extended. Overall, the experience was quite good, and I am very thankful to Editor Robert Tilton.

tudou312123 2021-07-01

2021.5.25 submitted
2021.5.28 under review
2021.6.23 reviewed and minor revisions requested
2021.6.28 returned
2021.6.29 accepted

粥粥舟舟 2021-07-01

4.24 Submission
5.6 Under review
6.1 Feedback on review comments, two reviewers. The first reviewer provided some suggestions (related to the mechanism of the article, very helpful). The other reviewer requested additional experiments and addressed some formatting issues.
6.17 Revised manuscript returned
6.24 Second reviewer requested additional references to be added
6.27 Revised manuscript returned
7.1 Article accepted

Myue 2021-07-01

After a reviewer has been assigned, some experiments were added. One week later, it was accepted.

不良人 2021-06-24

Fast speed, reviewers have certain requirements for innovation points.

eternity永恒 2021-06-04

5.06 submit
5.28 Return with revision suggestions (Three reviewers collectively presented three questions. Two minor revisions and one rejection. Editor-in-Chief Li Junbai provided an opportunity for revision.)
6.01 Return with revised manuscript
6.03 Acceptance
The journal's processing speed is very efficient, and we hope it continues to improve.

Yyyyyyyy 2021-06-03

3.29 Submission
4.2 Under review
4.27 Three review comments (to be revised and returned within 19 days)
5.18 With editor
5.21 Under review
6.2 Accept

凉茶1 2021-05-29

21.03.07 Submission; 21.04.14, three reviewers, major revision; 21.05.03 Submission of revised manuscript; 21.05.22 Second revision; 21.05.27 Submission; 21.05.28 Acceptance

幻城 2021-05-27

Translated: Transferred from Journal of Colloid and Interface Science.
3.24 with editor
3.28 under review
5.7 revise
5.24 resubmit
5.26 accept
There was only one reviewer who raised three questions. I conducted a small experiment to address them. The process was quite fast.

Rita_Tse 2021-05-24

21.03.31 submit - Submitted on March 31st, 2021.
21.04.01 with editor - Under review by the editor on April 1st, 2021.
21.04.05 under review - Currently being reviewed on April 5th, 2021.
21.04.19 required reviews completed - Required reviews have been completed on April 19th, 2021.
21.05.07 resubmit - Resubmission required on May 7th, 2021.
21.05.07 accept - Accepted on May 7th, 2021.
21.05.12 online - Available online on May 12th, 2021.