OER 2021-06-24

2021-04-13 Submission
2021-05-03 Three reviewers, one major revision, two minor revisions, one month time, required additional experiments, delayed for half a month due to personal matters and attending meetings, had to urgently make up for the experiments, but the results were quite good, significantly improving the depth of the article.
2021-06-02 Revised manuscript submitted
2021-06-13 Accepted
Editor Professor King Lun Yeung is very efficient, from submission to acceptance exactly two months, thank you!

小郎君 2021-06-21

I'm here again, and later it was sent for review. The review ended on 6.10.
On 6.17, the feedback was received. This time, it was only sent to two reviewers. One of them still had two questions, while the other agreed to accept it. The editor made minor revisions and asked to clearly state the conditions regardless of whether or not they agreed with those two questions. I feel like it probably won't be sent for review again, as the editor may have decided on their own.
It was resubmitted on 6.20, and the status has remained unchanged. After a few minutes, the editor sent an email saying they received it.

cyzw 2021-06-20

The review period should be given 21 days, and the review process is quite fast.

fhiowsahfioh 2021-06-20

Excuse me, which editor is it? My editor directly said that my work does not fit the SCOPE of his magazine and rejected it, asking me to submit it to his new publication instead. But I am specifically working on electrochemistry...

wang gang 2021-06-20

"Does '两次审稿时间都是21天' mean that the given review time is 21 days?"

LY1223 2021-06-18

4.27 submit
5.13 under review
6.6 minor corrections
6.13 submit
6.17 accept

cyzw 2021-06-15

January 18th: Submitted
March 24th: Received first review (during which, with editor for a month, after reminder, sent for review)
April 24th: Submitted revised manuscript, editor took two weeks before sending for review
May 21st: Confirmed completion of review through customer service inquiry
June 8th: Major revisions after second review
June 11th: Submitted revised manuscript
June 14th: Accepted (this time the process was very fast, quite unexpected)
The editor responsible for CFD direction, Nuno Miguel Reis, always takes two to three weeks to process the manuscript, regardless of when it reaches his hands. Both review periods lasted 21 days, spanning a total of 5 months, with most of the remaining time spent with this editor.

宙斯 2021-06-14

Excuse me, how can I not open the submission format requirements for CEJ?

guoguo 2021-06-14

The second paper has been accepted, I'm very happy.
Submitted on 4.09
Major revision on 5.08
Revised on 5.21
Accepted on 6.14
Thank you to my advisor and thanks to the editor for giving me another chance. I hope CEJ continues to improve! Let's work hard together.

zxn 2021-06-10

2021-04-07 Submission
2021-05-08 Three reviewers provided minor revisions and requested additional experiments, which indeed improved the depth of the article.
2021-05-29 Submitted revised manuscript.
2021-06-07 Accepted.
Editor Professor Jinwoo Lee is very efficient, as it took exactly two months from submission to acceptance.

文君 2021-06-10

Already submitted for 30 days and still with editor.

上辈子是数学题 2021-06-07

It has been 20 days since submission, and it is still "with editor". Does anyone else have this situation?

pc-co 2021-05-30

Why is there only one reviewer, and their comments are not so sharp? The editor rejected it.

小郎君 2021-05-27

3.19 Submission
3.23 Under review
4.25 Received feedback, 4 major revisions, 1 rejection, stating that photocatalysis does not fit this journal. Editor gave major revision and one month to make changes.
5.23 Added 5-6 experiments, had a break for Labor Day, answered all relevant questions, explained that some questions were nonsensical.
5.26 Editor returned the manuscript, not allowing line numbers because the generated PDF already has line numbers. Made changes and resubmitted on the same day.
Now waiting for the second review.

强 2021-05-24

Changed 5.16 for a major overhaul. Waited for half a month. Your possible edits may be undecided and sent for review again.

319 2021-05-23

01.14. Submitted to Journal
01.17. Editor submission
01.20. With editor
01.25. Under review
02.23. Required Reviews Completed
02.27. Major Revision
03.21. Revision Submitted to Journal
03.23. Provide marked and clean manuscript
03.24. Revision Submitted to Journal
03.26. With editor
03.28. Under review
04.10. Required Reviews Completed
04.24. Major Revision
04.30. Revision Submitted to Journal
05.04. With editor
05.09. Under review
05.20. Required Reviews Completed
05.23. Accepted

Translated:

01.14. Submitted to Journal
01.17. Editor submission
01.20. With editor
01.25. Under review
02.23. Required Reviews Completed
02.27. Major Revision
03.21. Revision Submitted to Journal
03.23. Provide marked and clean manuscript
03.24. Revision Submitted to Journal
03.26. With editor
03.28. Under review
04.10. Required Reviews Completed
04.24. Major Revision
04.30. Revision Submitted to Journal
05.04. With editor
05.09. Under review
05.20. Required Reviews Completed
05.23. Accepted

哈雷狄 2021-05-23

March 6th, 2021 - Submitted
April 12th, 2021 - Major revision
May 4th, 2021 - Revised
May 20th, 2021 - Accepted

wlboy 2021-05-22

Hello, your manuscript has been revised three times. Do you have any comments on the revisions?

歪歪 2021-05-20

Posted on March 26th and it has been almost two months since the submission. It is still under review. Today, I suddenly received an email from the editor, stating that my article has been in the submission process for 60 days and has not been completed. I have no idea what happened. Has anyone else experienced this situation?

歪歪 2021-05-19

Can I ask if the status of the original post has changed? My reviews were completed a few days ago, but immediately went back under review.

笨笨 2021-05-19

I won an article some time ago, and it took one month for Witheditor to review it.

11111111111111 2021-05-17

2021.02.22 Submit the paper;
2021.02.28 Send for review;
2021.03.23 Major revision; Ten questions in total from two reviewers;
2021.04.22 Sent back once due to highlight issues, resubmitted on the same day. Remember to upload a modified version when uploading the article after major revision. Also, upload a clear version without any modification traces;
2021.04.23 Send for review;
2021.05.17 Accepted; Todd is the editor. Only one reviewer was sent for the second review.
This tumultuous article finally found a good home. Just waiting for another article to graduate~~ It was really not easy. Wishing the journal better and better~~~~

jie- 2021-05-17

The original poster's edit.

白雪雪 2021-05-17

Excuse me, has the original poster (OP) given any feedback yet? My manuscript has been under review for 40 days.

啾啾~ 2021-05-16

with editors for more than 20 days, the reminder was rejected instantly. The editor stated that the article would be more suitable for submission to a journal focused on catalysis. I don't know what else to say, after all, there have been quite a few publications in this direction in that journal.

一支黑团子 2021-05-16

29.11.2020 submitted
01.06.2021 major revision Four reviewers, one of whom mentioned that there were not enough animal experiment groups and suggested adding them.
Extension of three months.
02.04.2021 revision
29.04.2021 accept

aaapple 2021-05-13

It has been ten days for me too.

jie- 2021-05-13

I don't know what it means. Can it be withdrawn? I cannot accept it before graduation. It has not been reviewed yet.

rmcqh 2021-05-12

The journal website has the following statement: Aries has detected slowness issues in EM/PM and users may experience some processing delays. Please know that work queues in the order received on the servers and while it may take some time to render, your work will not be lost. We will share additional status updates as soon as possible. I wonder if this is related to recent slow processing speed?

强 2021-05-12

I am Todd as well, and I have been requiring completed reviews for about 10 days.