xlq要努力呀 2023-07-04

Review article, previously submitted experimental articles have been reviewed quite quickly, just want to ask how long it usually takes for a review article to be under review.

2023.6.24 Submit
2023.6.27 With editor
2023.7.4 With editor.

顶刊小王子 2023-07-04

When with the editor?

Doctor GM 2023-07-04

2023.02.28 submit
2023.03.07 under review
2023.04.09 First review received, major revision. There were 5 reviewers, 3 suggested modifications, and 2 rejected it outright.
2023.04.29 Manuscript returned, wrote a response of over 5000 words and over 30 pages.
2023.05.07 Second review under review, editor only sent it to the 3 reviewers who suggested modifications in the first review.
2023.06.01 Second review received, minor revision. There were 3 reviewers, 2 accepted it, and 1 requested an additional experiment.
2023.06.12 Manuscript returned.
2023.06.14 Third review under review.
2023.07.04 Accept
This is a phase of the final stage of a doctoral dissertation, a first-tier paper with an Impact Factor greater than 15. The editor Theophilos Ioannides was very efficient and fast in handling the process. Thank you!

ACCEPT great 2023-07-04

Do you have any results now? Is it usually Ju after RRC to DIP?

Papers_Wu 2023-07-04

04/07/2023 RRC translates to July 4, 2023.

是豆豆啊 2023-07-03

So slow, it has been two months since the review... Do you have this long?

木侠 2023-07-02

2023.5.12 Submitted to journal
2023.5.15 With editor
2023.5.16 Under review
2023.6.13 Major revision, 3 positive comments and 1 negative comment, extensive revision
2023.6.29 Revision submitted to journal
2023.7.1 With editor

Braaandy 2023-07-01

2023.06.14 submit
2023.06.17 with editor
2023.06.20 with editor
2023.06.30 under review
2023.07.24 rejected. I feel like the second one wasn't carefully reviewed, they just rejected it with the reason of insufficient material innovation.

buzhidao 2023-06-30

May I ask how to appeal to CEJ? Should I resubmit or send an email to the editor through what email address? Both reviewers have made revisions, but the editor still rejected it. I want to appeal, but I don't know if anyone has appealed before.

xiangboairongrong 2023-06-30

04.12 submit
06.02 First trial opinions received, major revisions, 4 reviewers, 3 positive and 1 negative
06.22 Resubmission
06.27 rrc (unknown abbreviation)
06.30 accept
Editor Soryong R. Chae was very efficient and fast in handling, thank you!

失眠豆包 2023-06-30

I have been waiting for five to six days without receiving the review. I wanted to ask if you have submitted it yet.

努力搞科研123 2023-06-30

May I ask if it has been submitted for review? It has been 5 days with the editor and I still haven't received any updates.

xt1997 2023-06-29

Excuse me, have you submitted this for review? I submitted mine around the same time as yours and they are similar.

金三顺 2023-06-29

2023.06.19 submitted to journal
2023.06.20 with editor

Translated:
Submitted to journal on June 19, 2023.
With editor on June 20, 2023.

是豆豆啊 2023-06-28

This time it's a bit slow, baby. It was submitted for review on May 24th, and it's still under review today. It's just missing one set of review comments, which is really dragging it out. I remember in the past, the longest review period for CEJ manuscripts was 21 days. Could it be that the review period varies depending on the direction?

lilili000 2023-06-28

03.31 submit - Submitted on March 31st.
05.01 minor revision (3 reviewers) - Minor revisions requested by three reviewers on May 1st.
05.25 revision submit to journal - Revised version submitted to the journal on May 25th.
06.25 required reviews complete (2 reviewers) - Required reviews from two reviewers completed on June 25th.
06.27 accepted - Accepted on June 27th.

科研乐 2023-06-28

Impact factor 15.1

小布丁 2023-06-28

This is too difficult...

wangyf 2023-06-28

Do you know where to submit the opinions for transferring to the previous journal, experts?

lec 2023-06-27

0404 submit
0408 format
0412 with editor
0414 under review
0416/21 under review
0509 Required reviews completed
0510 major revision
0527 revision submitted to journal
0529 sent back to author
0529 revision submitted to journal
0531 with editor
0603 under review
0619 Required reviews completed
0620 minor revision
0622 revision submitted to journal; with editor
0623 accepted

Translation:

0404 - Submitted
0408 - Formatted
0412 - With editor
0414 - Under review
0416/21 - Under review
0509 - Required reviews completed
0510 - Major revision
0527 - Revision submitted to journal
0529 - Sent back to author
0529 - Revision submitted to journal
0531 - With editor
0603 - Under review
0619 - Required reviews completed
0620 - Minor revision
0622 - Revision submitted to journal; with editor
0623 - Accepted

day day upupup 2023-06-26

Accepted, bring good luck
2023.02.25 Submission
2023.03.14 Under review
2023.03.21 RRC (Reviewers' comments)
2023.03.26 RRC
2023.03.27 RRC
2023.03.28 RRC
2023.03.30 Major revision, 5 reviewers, 4 accepted, 1 rejected
2023.04.20 Delayed notification until 4.30
2023.04.30 Submit
2023.05.02 Under review
2023.05.07 RRC
2023.05.10 RRC
2023.05.16 RRC
2023.05.19 Major revision, still 4 accepted, 1 rejected
2023.06.04 Submit (Delayed by 3 days without sending a notification)
2023.06.09 Under review
2023.06.18 RRC
2023.06.25 Accepted

口天-吴 2023-06-26

Very well, just waiting for the results.

WHZ 2023-06-24

Ask the experts who have submitted comprehensive reviews, is CEJ strict about word count?

如此彻底 2023-06-24

Unfortunately, the provided text "23.6.22 rrc" does not seem to be a coherent phrase or sentence in any language, including English. It appears to be a combination of numbers and letters without any clear meaning or context. If you have any other text or specific translation request, please provide it, and I'll be happy to assist you.

day day upupup 2023-06-23

After the initial review, the revisions were done quickly (received replies from 5 reviewers in just 16 days). However, it has been 15 days since the second review and the status of the RRC has only changed once. Why is it so slow?

小男孩0911 2023-06-23

6.22 rrc
6.23 major revision
There are four reviewers, strangely the third reviewer's opinion hasn't come back yet. The first reviewer thought the work was good and gave minor revisions. The second reviewer didn't think it had much innovation. The last reviewer gave major revisions, fortunately the editor allowed for major revisions. Keep on revising diligently, Amitabha, qaq.

keyanren01 2023-06-23

After transferring, how do you see the situation?

大耳朵图图 2023-06-23

Translated:

Submitted 06 Apr 2023
Under review 31 May 2023
Required Reviews Completed 21 Jun 2023

如此彻底 2023-06-22

23.6.21 rrc does not have a specific meaning or context in English. It appears to be a date followed by an acronym or abbreviation, but without further information, it is not possible to provide an accurate translation.

CYnicT 2023-06-21

Finally, I'm done.
I'm really tired.
I wasted too much time.