levi258 2023-07-18

2023.05.20 under review
2023.06.28 major revision
2023.07.11 revision submitted
2023.07.13 under review with editor
2023.07.18 changed to dip, accepted

您好呀呀呀呀呀 2023-07-18

My submission was on 6.30
Reviewed on 7.2, score 3 1 0
On 7.10, score 4 1 0
On 7.11, score 5 1 0
Currently, there is only one agreed review for UR
You are so fast, it was rcc on 7.17

QS 2023-07-17

The handling speed of the article is still very fast. It was sent for review in three days, and the first round of reviews was completed in two weeks. I feel like someone gave a rejection, so it was sent for review by a third reviewer. Hoping for good luck again!
Jun 30, submitted
Jul 3, under review
Jul 16, required reviews completed
Jul 17, under review
Jul 23, required reviews completed
Jul 24, decision in process
Jul 24, rejection. The editor invited for resubmission after revision, with three reviewers providing a total of thirteen comments.
Hoping for good luck!

SCUCY 2023-07-12

2023.7.9 RRC (Invitation 2+, Acceptance of Review 2+, Completion of Review 2)
2023.7.11 Decision in process
2023.7.11 Major revision (Handled by Chief Editor Pietro Vincenzini throughout, incorporating comments from Reviewers 2 and 3, a total of 10 points). However, strangely, the decision letter did not mention the submission deadline...

已投被接收 2023-07-11

July 9th RRC, the review speed is very fast, but recently it seems that the RRC time is a bit long, hoping for smooth progress.

Dalexduan 2023-07-10

May 16: Submitted to journal
May 17: With general editor
May 18: With associated editor
May 25 - Jun 5: Under review
Jun 5: Required reviews completed
Jun 6: Decision in process
Jun 7: Major revision
Jun 29: Submission r1
Jun 29: With general editor
Jun 29: With associated editor
Jul 3: Under review
Jul 8: RRC (Reviewer's comments)
Jul 9: DIP (Decision in progress)
Jul 9: Accept
Tips: Each update during the "under review" stage may indicate reviewer acceptance or completion of the review. When the review process begins, the corresponding author's email will receive a real-time tracking link from no-reply@submissions.elsevier.com to monitor the status of the manuscript. The reviewers' comments are very fair, and the responses are positive. The journal values innovation. Overall efficiency is still very high. Best wishes for continued success in the future.

Dalexduan 2023-07-10

May 25-Jun 5: Under review
Jun 5: Required reviews completed
Jun 6: Decision in process
Jun 7: Major revision
Jun 29: Submission R1
Jun 29: With editor general editor
Jun 29: With editor associated editor
Jul 3: Under review
Jul 8: RRC
Jul 9: DIP
Jul 9: Accept

Note: Each update in the "Under review" status may represent reviewer acceptance/completion of the review, etc. When "Under review" begins, the corresponding author's email will receive a notification from no-reply@submissions.elsevier.com, which contains a link to track the real-time status of the manuscript review (track your submission). The reviewers' comments are very objective, and their responses are very positive. The journal focuses on innovation. Overall, the efficiency is still very high. Best wishes for continued success in your work at Guotao!

vakakav 2023-07-07

3.8 Vote
4.18 First-instance opinion
6.6 Second-instance opinion
6.30 RRC (Referee Review Committee)
7.6 Accept

Lasted for 4 months

vakakav 2023-07-07

After two modifications, finally hired.

大鱼大鱼 2023-07-07

I am also Maurizio Ferrari, editor. I hope for good luck!

鹿儿。 2023-07-05

Excuse me, have you responded to the comments from the review? Have you accepted them?

lllxxxx 2023-07-05

Appeals need to pay attention to the following details: 1. Emphasize one's own innovation. Compare and explain existing published papers; 2. Refute the opinions of the reviewers who rejected the paper one by one, providing reasons while respecting their opinions; 3. If the reviewer's tone is not good, such as showing contempt for the author, being not objective enough, or having biased opinions, it can be directly pointed out. 4. Try to implement the reviewer's feasible suggestions. It is necessary to show sincerity, respect, substantial innovative points, and content.

lllxxxx 2023-07-05

2023.4.1 Submission
4.3 Editor-in-chief transfers to Deputy Editor Xinmei Hou
5.3 Approval from one reviewer
5.15 Approval from three reviewers
5.18 Major revision, reviewer 1 suggests major revision, reviewer 2 rejects, reviewer 3 suggests minor revision
5.21 Revision submitted
5.28 Approval from reviewers 1 and 3, reviewer 2 continues to reject. No substantial modifications, only criticism of innovation and professionalism of myself and the other two reviewers
6.5 Appeal to introduce additional reviewer, appeal is very important
6.10 Editor sends out 3 more reviewer invitations
6.13 One person agrees
6.16 Reviewer completes the review
6.18 Major revision, professional and objective comments. Includes a lot of discussion and deletion of unnecessary details, emphasizes innovation
7.2 Accepted

真的是你呀 2023-07-04

Hello, may I ask what is the process for appeal? Where can I appeal, bro?

真的是你呀 2023-07-04

May I ask, if two reviewers give positive feedback after the first review, but one gives a negative review resulting in rejection, is it possible to appeal? I would like to know the process of appealing, should I send an email directly to the editor through the submission system?

已投被接收 2023-07-04

Reviewed 2+ submissions, received 2 reviewers on the same day. Received 2+ reviewers two days later. Currently, one reviewer has finished the review and hope to receive feedback within half a month.

SCUCY 2023-06-30

2023.5.31 submitted to journal
2023.6.1 with editor
2023.6.2 with editor
2023.6.12 under review (2+ invitations, 1 accepted review)
2023.6.15 under review (2+ invitations, 2 accepted reviews)
2023.6.20 under review (2+ invitations, 2 accepted reviews) track your submission date changed to 6.20
2023.6.22 under review (2+ invitations, 2 accepted reviews) track your submission date changed to 6.22
2023.6.30 under review (2+ invitations, 2+ accepted reviews, 1 completed review) track your submission date changed to 6.30

Ykkkkk123 2023-06-30

Submitted in mid-April, it is still under review and even on the 26th of this month, only the second reviewer was found. It's too slow, and my work is lagging behind by a research paper. I feel like I'm going to be dragged to death.

SCUCY 2023-06-30

After submission, the editor will send an email to the corresponding author to inform that the submission has been sent for review, and will attach the "Track your submission" link from Elsevier. At this point, you will be able to know who is handling the editorial process of your manuscript and track its status in real-time.

牧啊 2023-06-30

Hello, may I ask where can I see the changes in the status of your reviewers?

小小苏苏 2023-06-27

For possible final paper acceptance, significant revision efforts are needed for the entire paper's English language. Authors are strongly recommended to have their paper thoroughly revised by an authorized technical translation agency. The revised paper must be accompanied by an official certificate issued by the editing agency, and authors are advised to highlight any technical and language improvements made in their revised text. Will there be any consideration for papers that are not revised before submission?

浇注料大王 2023-06-27

I am still dip from early April until today.

来吃 2023-06-27

I would like to ask, do we have the option to choose whether to open source when submitting to Ceramic International? Because when I submitted to Euroceram and MSEA before, there was such an interface, but when I submitted to Ceramic International in April 2023, there was no such interface, and it was repeated twice without it. I would like to ask, did anyone else encounter this interface when submitting? And if it is accepted, can we choose whether to open source?

已投被接收 2023-06-27

According to my recent experience, it takes about a week for proofreading after receiving, then online, and about twenty days to have the page numbers done.

科研小朋友0524 2023-06-24

4.26 submission
5.3 review
5.31 rrc (unclear - no translation available)
6.12 major revision
Currently undergoing major revision...
I would like to ask the experts, how long does it take for a paper to be searchable after acceptance? I am in a hurry to graduate and I'm not sure if there is enough time.

小小苏苏 2023-06-23

Logged into the corresponding author's account and checked, it was given a major revision with a deadline of one month.

已投被接收 2023-06-22

June 19th, submitted (second submission of the year)
20th, with editor
21st, editor-in-chief gave it to the deputy editor
22nd, sent for review
Hope everything goes smoothly.

小小苏苏 2023-06-22

6.21 received revise and resubmit, as I am not the corresponding author, I do not have the details of the extent of revisions required, nor the specific deadline displayed.

SCUCY 2023-06-22

2023.5.31 submitted to journal
2023.6.1 with editor
2023.6.2 with editor
2023.6.12 under review (invited 2+, accepted 1 review)
2023.6.15 under review (invited 2+, accepted 2 reviews)
2023.6.20 under review (invited 2+, accepted 2 reviews) Track your submission date changed to 6.20
2023.6.22 under review (invited 2+, accepted 2 reviews) Track your submission date changed to 6.22
Was a new reviewer invited or what is the situation???

小小苏苏 2023-06-20

Pietro Vincenzini