Verified Reviews - Ceramics International
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

WJZhao 2021-07-17

Go upstairs, it shouldn't be considered a minor repair without any minor changes, it's just a revision. The reviewer is the one who provides an evaluation of the work and adds some details.

yummy 2021-07-13

Hello, may I ask if the reviewer of 7.11 has given minor revisions?

WJZhao 2021-07-13

6.21 First draft
6.22 Major revision (just polishing)
6.29 Morning: revised; Afternoon: revise (upload clean manuscript)
6.30 Under review
7.2 Required reviews completed
7.11 Revise
7.12 Accept
7.12 Submit revised version
7.13 Accepted
The review process was very fast, thanks to Chief Editor Pietro Vincenzini and Assistant Editor Xiao Hu. Wishing Guotao the best in his future endeavors.

tony2800 2021-07-12

The overall speed is still quite fast, with the first trial taking one month and the second trial taking a little over a week. The issues are not very tricky either. I recommend it.

cmultt 2021-07-10

May I ask if you are submitting for OA?

NingChou 2021-07-07

The content is okay. The first time I was rejected, they said the similarity rate was too high. Later, the similarity rate decreased significantly, so I tried to submit it again. However, I was rejected again this time, without mentioning the similarity rate or any other reasons...

认真脸 2021-07-01

I would like to ask how to know which one is the assistant editor.

LHDDSB 2021-06-30

This situation usually occurs when the repetition rate is too high. If the content of the article is good, you can revise it and submit it again! I have submitted two articles, both of which were rejected immediately. Later, I discovered this pattern: if the repetition rate is below 15%, there is a high probability of acceptance.

LHDDSB 2021-06-30

This result is usually due to a high level of article repetition.

SWRO 2021-06-30

Master, does the review end in 5 days? How many reviewers are there?

Krystal 2021-06-29

2021.6.4 Submission
2021.6.6 with editor
2021.6.8 under review
2021.6.13 major revision
2021.6.25 Revised
2021.6.26 under review
2021.6.29 Accepted

SStonee 2021-06-26

The change in dates is due to the search for reviewers. Currently, there are generally two reviewers for each paper. If the reviewers have conflicting opinions, a third reviewer will be sought for arbitration. Therefore, the review process will take longer than before, around 2 to 4 weeks.

田园生活3032 2021-06-25

My date has never changed.

田园生活3032 2021-06-24

Encountered the exact same situation, how is the original poster doing now?

20200415 2021-06-23

I am in the same situation. May I ask if the original poster has received it?

KOBEEE 2021-06-22

My situation is also like this!

KOBEEE 2021-06-22

My situation is also like this.

张小呆 2021-06-22

May 5, 2021 - Posted
May 6 - Under review
May 22 - Required review complete
May 24 - Under review
June 8 - Under review
I don't know what's going on. If anyone has any information, please let me know. Thank you!

up 2021-06-22

5.30投 - Submitted on May 30th
6.2再审 - Re-examined on June 2nd
然后6.4 - Then on June 4th
6.20 - June 20th
日期变了两下,还在审 - The dates changed twice, still under review.

TV唯物主义 2021-06-16

Mine became the "final decision" on that day.

麦迪阿拉卡 2021-06-15

Bro, how long does it usually take for the first time Required Reviews Completed?

麦迪阿拉卡 2021-06-08

Brother, may I ask how many reviewers are there?

jiamaolee 2021-05-25

Feel like Xiao Hu is in charge, there won't be any results without 3 months. It has been over 2 months since the submission, and it is still in the second review. This editor is really too slow!

Perhaps 2021-05-14

The first review took nearly 4 months, which is too slow. There was only one reviewer, who was a foreigner, and there were only three minor issues, considered as minor revisions. Two weeks later, the revised manuscript was uploaded, and it was accepted three days later. It has basically passed the first round of major editing by P. V, and the chances of acceptance are high. The assistant editor is Xiao Hu.

TV唯物主义 2021-05-10

Submission cycle is 3.5 months.
After submission, it takes one week for the "with editor" status,
followed by three weeks for the "under review" status.
After major revisions are uploaded, it is sent for review on the same day or the next day,
and remains in the "under review" status for two weeks.

After further major revisions are uploaded, it is sent for review on the same day or the next day,
with the following review dates:
April 1st - under review
April 11th - under review
April 21st - under review
May 5th - review process ends (reviewer change)

After minor revisions are uploaded, it is directly sent for review,
and remains in the "under review" status for two days before being accepted.

顺利来一波 2021-05-09

Thank you for your interest in publishing with Ceramics International. Unfortunately, due to an extremely high number of submissions to the journal, we are unable to consider your manuscript.

谢谢谢谢 2021-05-03

Is the repetition rate of the manuscript too high? There is a similarity check value at the bottom of the email. Generally, instant rejection is due to a high repetition rate. My rejection within 2 minutes, suddenly remembered that I forgot to mention in the cover letter that there is a preprint, my brain hurts!

Swaggyr 2021-04-27

Translation:

2021.1.28 Submission
During the process, there were two major revisions on average with 15 comments each time.
2021.4.25 Accepted
The review process was very fast.

一抹茶香 2021-04-09

2021.1.4 Submission
2021.1.5 Under review
2021.3.16 Revision received, minor changes
2021.4.2 Revised manuscript returned
2021.4.6 Accepted
Thank you, Editor-in-Chief Pietro Vincenzini

祎祎 2021-04-03

Yes, but the speed feels alright.

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started