Verified Reviews - Ceramics International
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

lovename 2023-08-06

How long does Girish M kale take to review?

Evie 2023-08-05

May I ask how long your article has been under review for the second time?

Evie 2023-08-05

How long does the second review generally take? It has already been 10 days, and one reviewer has still not provided any feedback. Could they have run away?

chenyut 2023-08-02

submitted to journal 23.5.25
with editor 23.5.25
under review 23.5.30 - 2 reviewers
review completed 23.6.24
Major revision 23.6.27

1st revision
with editor 23.7.6
under review 23.7.9
reviews completed 23.7.23
decision in process 23.7.24
accepted 23.7.25

图图兔 2023-08-02

May 9th - Submit
May 10th - With editor
May 16th - Under review
May 10th - RRC
May 14th - Decision in process
June 16th - Revision 1 (Two reviewers, proposed 18 modifications, added two experiments and some tests)
July 13th - Resubmit
July 14th - Under review
July 26th - RRC
July 31st - Decision in process
July 31st - Revision 2 (Editor-in-chief requested title modification, submitted at 6:30 PM on the same day)
July 31st - With editor
August 1st - Decision in process
August 2nd - Accept (Received email notification at 4 PM, 10 AM in Italy. Thank you Editor-in-chief Pietro Vincenzini, thank you reviewers, hope Guotao continues to improve!)

Johnny_zxy 2023-08-02

3.23 with editor - In the hands of the editor
3.26 3.30 under review - Under review from March 26th to March 30th
4.12 required reviews completed - Necessary reviews have been completed
4.17 under review - Under review
4.23 major revision - Major revision needed
5.13 5.15 with editor - In the hands of the editor from May 13th to May 15th
5.16 5.23 under review - Under review from May 16th to May 23rd
5.24 6.4 required reviews completed - Necessary reviews have been completed from May 24th to June 4th
6.6 major revision - Major revision needed
6.10 with editor - In the hands of the editor
6.12 under review - Under review
6.15 major revision - Major revision needed
7.12 with editor - In the hands of the editor
7.15 7.23 under review - Under review from July 15th to July 23rd
8.1 accepted - Accepted on August 1st

碳烤小生蚝 2023-08-01

Is there a template for the reference format?

keyanwhita 2023-08-01

Submit the Word version directly, there are no special formatting requirements.

caczhtus 2023-07-31

Excuse me, did you submit a Word version? I couldn't find the template, I'm not sure if it doesn't support LaTeX?

caczhtus 2023-07-31

May I ask if this journal can be used with LaTeX?

YJZ369 2023-07-30

How come the impact factor has decreased again?

keyanwhita 2023-07-30

7.17 main editor, assigned to Girish M Kale on the same day, still with the editor until 7.30, is this situation not good?

ZJ 2023-07-27

The amount of manuscript is too large, not considering.

鹿儿。 2023-07-27

4.25 submitted
4.26/27 twice with editor
5.6/7/14/20/24 changed 5 times under review
5.27/6.1 RRC twice
6.6 given one month for major revisions
7.3 submitted revisions
7.4 under review
7.22/23 RRC, DIP
7.24 accepted
Overall, it took 3 months.

Evie 2023-07-27

7.17 Revised manuscript completed
7.19 With editor
Did not log in for two days in between
7.22 Required reviews completed
7.25 Under review
May I ask why it changed to "under review" after the second review?

岩中松 2023-07-27

3 reviewers, 33 comments, major revisions. The entire process took nearly 2 months.

chenyut 2023-07-26

May I ask why it was rejected?

longlongli 2023-07-26

How long does the RRC state usually last?

chemdq 2023-07-25

Why was it rejected after the second review?

ZJ 2023-07-25

I submitted in the morning, but in the afternoon, it was rejected and I cried.

科研小朋友0524 2023-07-25

7.24, the paper has finally been accepted, I am very happy.
I submitted it on 4.26 and went through a major revision and a minor revision. It was accepted on 7.24, in less than three months.
I would like to thank the editor-in-chief, Pietro Vincenzini, and the deputy editor, Xiao Hu, for their prompt handling. I would also like to thank the two reviewers for their fair and rigorous comments. I wish Ceramic International continued success.

科研的笨鸟 2023-07-24

2023.7.24 under review (A reviewer) Please, I beg you.

Ykkkkk123 2023-07-23

It has been over three months, still under review, and only one reviewer has completed their review. The other reviewer seems to have disappeared, it's really frustrating. Please, I really beg for a smoother process.

minglv 2023-07-22

May I ask how many words are there in the main text?

已投被接收 2023-07-22

On July 16th, major revisions were made and three reviewers provided 26 comments. Hmm, hoping for smooth progress.

科研的笨鸟 2023-07-20

2023.716 Rework, to be delivered to the deputy editor on the same day.
2023.7.20 with editor, still not submitted for review.

科研小朋友0524 2023-07-20

6.26 Major repair submission
7.10 Feedback received, second revision
7.15 Second revision submission
Currently with editor

zzzcsupm006 2023-07-19

Pray for good luck!!

zzzcsupm006 2023-07-19

2023.06.13 major revise - Revised extensively on June 13, 2023.
2023.06.29 revise submitted, 当天under review - Revised submitted on June 29, 2023, and under review on the same day.
2023.07.04 rrc - RRC (Reasonable Revision Considered) on July 4, 2023.
2023.07.05 under review - Under review on July 5, 2023.
2023.07.16 rrc - RRC (Reasonable Revision Considered) on July 16, 2023.

longlongli 2023-07-18

Is it a major repair both times?

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More