Verified Reviews - CELLULOSE
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

寻一 2021-06-01

Submitted on January 5th, feedback received on February 7th, revised on March 30th, accepted on May 9th, online on May 20th.
There were three reviewers, each of them very professional and meticulous. They pointed out any inaccuracies in the wording. As a first-year master's student, there were many issues and deficiencies, but after making revisions one by one, it greatly improved. The editor-in-chief was also very helpful, pointing out inaccuracies in my structure and teaching me how to make corrections when proofreading. I highly recommend this top journal in the fields of textiles and wood. I hope everyone submits and cites more articles, let's aim for the top tier.

一片黄叶 2021-04-16

I did something relatively simple, a wearable sweat detection device made from cellulose yarn. It was done very simply and combined some hot topics, so the process was quite easy. This is my first master's thesis, and at the time, I didn't know how to conduct research. I sincerely request citation and discussion, hahaha. "Cellulose (2019) 26:4553-4562
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02396-y"

shaoshao 2021-03-15

The top journal in the field of wood science, with consistently the highest impact factor.

shaoshao 2021-03-01

Why is jmca saying this here???

shaoshao 2021-03-01

Is this unexpected? I have submitted several articles and have never encountered this situation with you before.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started