Verified Reviews - Carbohydrate Polymers
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

EXRC 2022-03-30

May I ask if this journal requires the main text to be no more than 6000 words, including the author's statement of contribution and acknowledgments for the article?

EXRC 2022-03-29

May I ask if the total word count should not exceed 6000, does it include the author's contribution statement and acknowledgements for the article?

湘科院材料 2022-03-05

Mine too, shortly after submitting, the editor made major revisions and then sent it for review. Now it has been 5 days since the required reviews were completed, but there is still no news.

梓阳 2022-03-05

However, it is gratifying to receive it, and it is also worth being happy about it.

梓阳 2022-03-05

From submission to acceptance took 6 months. The editor requested a major revision once, and after submission, the reviewer also requested a major revision. I have to say that this editor is too slow. The process of making revisions myself and by the reviewer took a total of 75 days, while it stayed with the editor for 102 days. This is truly frustrating.

蜜糖33 2022-03-05

During the major renovation, I also got lucky.

蜜糖33 2022-03-03

Which editor is it?

GUO.. 2022-03-03

Within the span of over two months, the delay in reviewing the manuscript multiple times was already frustrating enough. Then, when the reviewer's comments came out, they demanded a bunch of outdated data, even though one experiment simply couldn't be conducted due to lack of resources. They didn't even send it for review! More than three months of time wasted for nothing. Now, I am facing tremendous pressure on whether I can graduate or not. Everyone, please think carefully before submitting to this journal. They will truly raise your blood pressure with their endless delays.

问津 2022-02-16

I am too, but mine is fast enough. Two days of rejection, and today I received a message.

容三岁的小明 2022-02-16

Facing graduation, my advisor insists on having me submit to this journal. I have been with the editor for 6 days already. Have any of you encountered this situation?

duner 2022-02-04

Come to fulfill one's vow.
The first trial took more than two months for major repairs.
The second trial took one and a half months for acceptance.
As long as there are major repairs, there is a possibility.

duner 2022-01-31

May I ask, how long did it take for you to complete your required reviews in the end?

duner 2022-01-28

The second round of required reviews have been completed for 10 days already, but there is still no outcome.

湘科院材料 2022-01-22

A little slow. However, the situation on my side is like this: the article status is "with editor", and in less than half a month, it went directly to "Major Revisions for reconsideration". It's embarrassing, probably because the formatting is incorrect.

湘科院材料 2022-01-22

May I ask if your article's status goes directly from "with editor" to "under review"? Thank you.

湘科院材料 2022-01-22

May I ask if the status of your article is "With Editor" directly to "Under review"? Thank you.

湘科院材料 2022-01-22

There is a strange phenomenon where, in less than 2 weeks after submission, the status changes from "with editor" to "Major Revisions for reconsideration." I don't know what is happening, and I'm wondering if anyone else has experienced this.

应景 2022-01-21

Initial Date Submitted: Dec 19, 2021; Revised: Jan 17, 2022 5:07 AM
Three reviewers, along with the editor's comments, provided a total of over twenty suggestions.

洋梨棒棒 2022-01-21

May I ask about the journal's fee situation?

洋梨棒棒 2022-01-21

May I ask about the charging situation for this journal?

duner 2022-01-18

I am also this editor... It's really slow.

路人A_0364 2022-01-18

2022.1.11 Submitted;
2022.1.17 Under review
To be continued...

玄武盾 2022-01-16

I waited for 21 days before submitting for review.

湘科院材料 2022-01-16

On the day of submission, I was with the editor, but after waiting for 10+ days, it is still in this state. Is this considered slow?

廖洲 2022-01-11

Receive review comments after about a month, in addition to the five reviewers assigned by the editor, major revisions were given.

狗儿狗 2022-01-10

Excuse me, does anyone know the current real-time Impact Factor of this magazine? Thank you.

shijiazhao 2021-12-14

Hello, may I ask where to check which editor is assigned?

yeyeye! 2021-12-10

After three months of submission, I received comments from the reviewers. The editor rejected the submission, which is really unfortunate.

lsx20131120a 2021-12-07

The chemical factors are much lower than the engineering technology.

kimkim 2021-12-05

Will this magazine be firmly classified as a second-tier publication next year when the latest Chinese Academy of Sciences reclassification moves it from engineering technology to chemistry?

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now