Verified Reviews - Carbohydrate Polymers
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

accept-publish 2022-11-19

Attention everyone: Is this journal requiring the main text to be within 6000 words?

leeleeh 2022-11-05

10.19 Submission
10.21 with editor
10.24 Under review
11.1 Review comments - Three reviewers, two suggest direct acceptance with no issues, the third one raised several minor issues and suggests major revisions. Editor suggests major revisions.
11.4 Resubmission, sent for review again in the afternoon of the same day
11.5 Accepted
It took half a month from submission to acceptance. Dr. Mi is an amazing editor.

颖妹 2022-10-10

2022-8-5-submit
2022-9-11-major revision
2022-10-9-minor revision
2022-10-10-accepted
Thank you to editor Rekha Singhal, PhD, for being prompt and responsible.

advanced soft materials 2022-10-10

Thank you to editor Feng Jiang.

Pierre Cashon 2022-09-17

Will the journal send an email to the corresponding author's email for review?

advanced soft materials 2022-07-26

7.21 required reviews completed.
7.24 The date changed once but still required reviews completed.
I don't know when all of them can be reviewed, it's frustrating.

advanced soft materials 2022-07-18

7.14 Revisions submitted.
7.15 Under review.

HOFFMAN 2022-07-11

6.23 Submitted
6.26 UR
7.11 Required reviews completed

advanced soft materials 2022-06-28

Excuse me, everyone. Why did the submission need revision the next day after being with the editor? The editor provided a lot of feedback. Does it mean it doesn't need to be reviewed?

蜜糖33 2022-06-15

I am also this editor. The review took 6 days and ended. Now it is already the 5th day after the review ended, but there is still no news. It is really terrifying.

蜜糖33 2022-06-15

It has only been a week since my external audit ended, and it hasn't been updated yet.

熊若愚 2022-06-13

May I ask what to do if the abstract cannot be less than 150 words?

liqiong987 2022-06-13

The images and tables are directly inserted into the text.

jingnancyjing 2022-06-08

Submission experience:
2022.03.25 submitted
2022.03.26 with editor
2022.03.30 under review
2022.04.12 required reviews completed
2022.04.20 major revision
2022.05.18 submitted
2022.05.18 with editor
2022.05.18 under review
2022.06.02 required reviews completed
2022.06.04 minor revisions for acceptance
2022.06.06 resubmitted
2022.06.07 accepted

小钰钰 2022-05-13

May I ask, how long does it usually take for you to review?

hjdiyy 2022-05-13

First time submitting to a CP, there were 6 reviewers in the first round, major revisions were required with over 50 questions, various additional experiments were conducted, and it took 40 days to return with a response draft of over 30 pages and nearly 10,000 words. In the second round, it took 10 days and one reviewer suggested minor revisions with 3 small issues. The minor revisions were completed within 2 days and accepted. This was the most extensive response I have written so far, but fortunately, it was accepted.

llllllltttttttttt 2022-05-09

Okay, thank you!

undefined 2022-05-07

I am also a first reviewer for 12 days, with three reviewers. One rejected the manuscript, two suggested minor revisions, and the editor recommended major revisions.

玄武盾 2022-05-05

2021.12.17 submit - Submitted on December 17, 2021
2021.12.17 with editor - Under editor's consideration on December 17, 2021
2022.1.6 under review - Under review on January 6, 2022
2022.3.7 major revision - Requires major revision on March 7, 2022
2022.4.3 submitted - Resubmitted on April 3, 2022
2022.4.4 with editor - Under editor's consideration on April 4, 2022
2022.4.14 under review - Under review on April 14, 2022
2022.5.1 completed - Completed on May 1, 2022
2022.5.5 accepted - Accepted on May 5, 2022

qinzhao 2022-05-02

No problem, as long as you don't click submit for your revised draft in the end, it won't have any impact!

圈圈2 2022-04-22

I also want to know, have you got your results yet?

llllllltttttttttt 2022-04-22

First submission, the external review took two months and just returned the opinion for major revisions. I accidentally clicked "Revise Submission" directly among the four options (1. View Submission 2. File Inventory 3. Revise Submission 4. Decline to Revise) under Action, without having the chance to check the File Inventory. I want to ask what is included in this File Inventory. Will it have a big impact if I haven't downloaded the File Inventory? Thank you for your information!

dongli2050 2022-04-18

May I ask how to identify which editor it is? Also, where can I see the editing history? In the submission system, I can only see the current status.

dongli2050 2022-04-18

May I ask how to see which editor it is? Where can I see the editing history? I can only see the current status.

hackfeng 2022-04-15

May I ask, when you submit it, are the pictures and tables attached separately in Word or are they inserted into the text?

hackfeng 2022-04-15

Do you need to directly insert pictures and tables into Word now?

INULIN 2022-04-11

2.15 Submission
The first review, major revision, and minor revision took one month.
There has been no news since the second review on 4.3, and there is no hope for graduation.

展望 2022-04-05

Thank you very much to Rekha Singhal for editing. The efficiency in handling the manuscript was very high. We went through one major revision and two minor revisions in total, with a submission cycle of around three months.

undefined 2022-04-03

It's been 10 days since I completed the required review, but there's been no response or update.

梓阳 2022-04-01

There is no word limit, right? The total word count of my article is over ten thousand, including the references which don't take up much space. Anyway, it shows over twelve thousand words in Word. The editor didn't mention any word limit either. Plus, there are thirteen figures.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started