serendipityxh 2022-07-06

The overall duration is 2 months, the review process is strict. I wish bae all the best.

taco 2022-07-04

The content of the urban planning direction does not match, so the review is slow. I am prepared to urge it, and if necessary, it is better to withdraw the submission than to drag it on. I suggest being cautious about submitting in the future.
5.11 Submitted to the system
5.13 with editor
5.17 under review, but no expert has accepted the review
5.28 under review. One expert has accepted the review
7.4 under review, the last date change was on 6.11

张小菜 2022-06-02

The review speed was quite fast, mainly due to the pandemic and my own procrastination. The time for revising the paper was relatively long. There were two reviewers. The first time, they provided 10 comments, and the second time, after revisions, they provided 3 comments. It has now been accepted.

2.3: Submitted to the journal
2.5: Under review
2.7: Under review
2.9: Under review
3.5: Required reviews completed
3.10: Revision (2 reviewers, one approved, one said it was meaningless, a total of 10 comments)
4.15: Under review
5.4: Revision (major) (one reviewer, 3 comments)
5.24: Under review
5.31: Accepted

念无极 2022-05-26

Submitted on 5.13, rejected on 5.15. The reason is that the email is not official. I will try submitting again after changing the email.

Archer 2022-05-07

Rejected, one reviewer feels that there is not enough innovation.

Archer 2022-05-03

I submitted an article on March 19th.
Mar 19, 2022 9:24AM - Submitted to Journal
Mar 21, 2022 9:49AM - With Editor
Mar 24, 2022 2:20PM - Under Review
Mar 29, 2022 6:12AM - Under Review
Apr 3, 2022 3:25AM - Under Review

It is now May 3rd and it is still under review.
Isn't the review process supposed to be fast? It has been over a month and there has been no progress. Should I send an email to remind them?

LINZH 2022-04-14

The review speed and quality of BAE are really good, and the reviewers' comments are quite positive. The submission process took a total of two months. Doing research in architecture is not easy, so let's encourage each other. Here is the submission process:

- February 9th: Submitted to the journal
- February 11th: Under review
- March 7th: Revision
- March 28th: Under review
- April 11th: Required reviews returned
- April 14th: Accepted

小木白 2022-03-11

Excuse me, is the environmental focus of this journal limited to small-scale aspects such as architectural environment, or can it include research on larger-scale urban or regional environmental aspects?

J博士欧文 2022-03-05

The following text is written in Chinese and translates to English as:

"Articles on the indoor thermal environment and airflow in architecture were written.
1.5 System submission
1.27 Rework
2.15 Upload after modification
2.27 Acceptance
This is currently the fastest processing and reviewing speed I have experienced in submitting articles to various journals. The responsible editor selected Lin."

唯一.14 2022-02-09

Submitted on December 1st, received the second external review result on February 9th. One reviewer approved, while another reviewer requested further modifications. Not sure if there will be a third external review. The graduation of the Master's degree depends on this paper. Hoping for good news. The specific timeline is as follows:
- December 1st: Manuscript submitted to the journal
- December 3rd: Under editor's review
- December 16th: Under external review
- January 4th: Required reviews completed
- January 18th: Revised manuscript submitted to the journal
- January 20th: Under review
- February 9th: Required reviews completed

Lucky Judy 2021-12-27

May I ask if you can invest in environmental rocks?

香菜味福佳白 2021-10-14

I feel that the content of the article does not really fit well with the journal and I don't have much hope, I just wanted to try my luck. As expected, the editor replied a couple of days after submitting, asking me to submit to another journal with an impact factor of around 6 in the first district. The response time is really impressive. It's a good journal, and if I have the opportunity, I will submit again.

BEE 2021-10-12

Indoor environment direction, one week for review after submission, one month for feedback on revisions, less than 10 comments from three reviewers, minor revisions were given by the editor, returned after overnight modifications, accepted notification given after 1 day. It is a top journal in the field of architectural environment, with Professor Chen Qingyan as the editor-in-chief, and the efficiency has always been high. It has been upgraded to Zone One, and hopes to continue improving.

乘风破浪的我 2021-07-28

If it's earthquake-resistant, as long as it is connected to buildings on the ground or underground or the surrounding environment, it will be acceptable.

乘风破浪的我 2021-07-28

The journal review process is quite fast, and the reviewers are very professional.

1 2021-06-27

Hello, may I ask if this journal accepts articles on earthquake resistance?

1 2021-06-27

Hello, may I ask if this journal accepts articles on durability or earthquake resistance?

Danica Hou 2021-04-20

Second submission to BAE, the reviewers were very professional, and the entire process went smoothly. The first review had two reviewers, each with less than 10 comments. It seems one reviewer suggested major revisions while the other suggested minor revisions. The editor ultimately requested a revise. The second review took a bit longer, but the results were good, so all the waiting was worth it. Good luck to everyone!

Dec 22, 2020 - Submitted
Jan 4, 2021 - Under review
Feb 20, 2021 - Required reviews completed
Feb 24, 2021 - Revise
Mar 14, 2021 - Submitted
Mar 15, 2021 - With editor
Mar 20, 2021 - Under review
Apr 6, 2021 - Required reviews completed
Apr 18, 2021 - Decision in process
Apr 20, 2021 - Completed-Accepted

cathay 2021-03-26

Finally received, sharing it.
Submitted on December 22, 2020.
Accepted on March 25, 2021.
Two reviewers provided more than a dozen comments within a month of submission and gave three weeks for revisions.
After uploading the revisions, one of the experts provided another comment, leading to further modifications.
After the second round of revisions, I waited for two weeks and finally received the long-awaited acceptance message, feeling happy.

This is my second submission. Although the first submission was rejected, the two experts provided nearly 50 detailed modification suggestions. However, it was rejected due to limited presentation of research outcomes. After making revisions based on the experts' suggestions, it was accepted by a journal in the second tier. The efficiency of BAE is really high, and the reviewers are very responsible.

hhhenry 2021-03-23

It's too difficult, with 4 reviewers, the revision has taken 3 weeks to complete, feeling anxious and uneasy.

取什么名好呢 2021-03-08

Why do you have so few reviewers? I am crying because there are only five reviewers.

樱桃九熟 2021-03-07

Thank you for sharing, this is also my first time investing, and the status of "under review" keeps changing frequently. I hope to have a good outcome like the original poster!

Dadadadadi 2021-03-02

First submission, under review. The changes are very frequent, and I was once worried about being rejected... I want to share my review process with everyone and give everyone encouragement!
November 13: Submitted
November 16: Under review with editor
November 18: Under review
November 23: Under review
November 25: Under review
November 27: Under review
December 4: Under review
December 14: Under review
December 21: Under review
December 22: Under review
December 27: Required reviews completed
December 30: Under review
January 9: Under review
January 14: Revision required
February 5: Under review with editor
February 6: Under review
February 13: Under review
February 23: Decision in process
February 26: Accepted
Four reviewers, 36 major suggestions, one of whom was very responsible and directly marked them in the paper. There were about 80 suggestions in total, big and small, and I was given 21 days to make the revisions. As long as I carefully revise according to the suggestions, there should be no problem.

菜鸟2号 2021-02-15

Thank you to Professor Yang, the chief editor, thank you to editor Bert Blocken, and thank you to the reviewers. The speed is indeed quite fast.

fujing7579 2021-01-16

The journal review process is very fast, and the reviewers are highly skilled.
8.22 Manuscript submitted to the journal.
8.25 Under review.
8.31 Under review.
9.13 Required review completed.
9.23 Revision requested (two reviewers, 60 comments).
10.20 Revision submitted to the journal.
10.21 Under review.
11.5 Re-revision requested (two reviewers, 8 comments).
11.17 Revision submitted to the journal.
11.17 With editor.
11.18 Accepted.
11.21 Available online.