zxdzxd 2022-09-11

Is there any result, darling?

Davor HW 2022-09-11

The journal is very professional, but the editing process is a bit slow, and it takes a long time to wait. After the initial review for nearly 8 months, because one reviewer did not review, the editor found another one and quickly handled it well. After major revisions, it was directly accepted.

Patricia_hd 2022-09-06

When under review, an email will be sent to your contact email address with the subject "Track the status of your submission to Biomedical Signal Processing and Control," including the corresponding website link. By clicking on it, you will be able to view the progress of your manuscript review.

xxyyhh 2022-09-04

Share the timeline of my submission to this journal:
2022.4.16 submit
2022.4.25 with editor
2022.5.06 under review
2022.6.07 required reviews completed
2022.7.09 major revision
2022.7.26 revised for major revision
2022.8.23 second round of required reviews completed
2022.9.04 accept

Qinsuki 2022-09-01

2022.8.31 under review translates to "August 31, 2022 under review" in English.

眨眼的梦幻 2022-09-01

It has been two months with the editor, what should I do?

眨眼的梦幻 2022-09-01

What's going on after two months with the editor?

一心想毕业的科研小白 2022-08-30

How long does it take in total? It has been ten days for me and I still haven't entered the next process.

debu9 2022-08-30

Envious, I have been under review for one and a half months. So far, no reviewers have accepted the invitation. I am waiting anxiously!

ycsuccess 2022-08-28

2022.4.1 Submit
2022.4.2 With Editor
2022.4.10 Under Review
6 reviewers in total
2022.4.27 Decision in Process
2022.4.28 Revise (Major Revision)
2022.6.9 Submit & With Editor
2022.6.11 Under Review
2022.6.20 Required Reviews Completed
2022.6.25 Decision in Process
2022.7.11 Revise (Minor Revision)
2022.7.29 Submit & With Editor
2022.8.8 Accept
The overall review period is not long, and the journal's review efficiency is quite high. It took 4 months mainly because of the long time spent on self-revision, and various things in the middle also caused delays. In short, I am very satisfied to wait for a good result. Last year, the journal was upgraded to a second-tier journal by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the impact factor has been continuously increasing. The future is promising, and I hope the BSPC journal will continue to improve.

Qinsuki 2022-08-25

Same question, mine is still "with editor" and not even "under review", why is yours so fast?

爱吃饭的饭 2022-08-25

Why are yours so fast? My under view has been for over two months and still no news.

哇o哈哈 2022-08-24

One month of review, received major revisions, and after submitting the revisions, it was directly accepted half a month later. The speed was still very fast, and the reviewer's comments were very fair and meticulous. The impact factor has also increased this year, it is a good choice!

Qinsuki 2022-08-19

2022.8.17 Submitted
2022.8.18 With Editor

爱吃饭的饭 2022-08-18

May I ask how to determine the number of reviewers who have completed the review?

Patricia_hd 2022-08-15

Mar 22, 2022 Submitted
Apr 09, 2022 Reject, re-submittal possible
Apr 11, 2022 Submitted
Apr 14, 2022 Under Review
One week later, one reviewer completed the review, and then there were no reviewers accepting the review. Reminder sent twice.
Aug 08, 2022 Decision in Process
Aug 15, 2022 MAJOR REVISION 15 comments in total from two reviewers, two experiments added
Sep 05, 2022 With Editor
Sep 06, 2022 Under Review
Sep 10, 2022 Required Reviews Completed
Sep 12, 2022 Decision in Process
Sep 18, 2022 Minor revision
Oct 03, 2022 "With Editor"
Oct 05, 2022 Required Reviews Completed

NIC_LI 2022-08-12

It has been over half a month with the editor, but there is no news at all.

chenghaicq 2022-08-10

Two months later for major revisions, there were a total of ten suggestions from two people. The second reviewer only provided grammar suggestions, which seemed ineffective for peer review. The focus should be on addressing the first reviewer's five suggestions, three of which require additional experiments. I hope the revisions won't lead to rejection, as I am looking forward to using it for graduation.

AOO 2022-08-09

Translate the following text into English: Submitted at the end of March, received the first-round review comments at the end of July. The editor suggested major revisions, but there was only one reviewer's opinion, mostly regarding explanatory issues.

-----------Dividing Line

Less than a week after receiving the first-round review comments, the status of the article changed to "decision in process."

After another two weeks, it was directly accepted. Lucky.

沉沦醉生梦 2022-08-08

March 3rd submission;
May 9th major revision feedback;
May 29th submission for first review;
July 11th minor revision feedback;
July 13th submission for second review;
August 8th officially accepted.
In 2021, it was upgraded to the second district of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The quality of the reviewers is still quite high, and they provided many helpful suggestions. However, the processing speed of the editors this year is a bit slow. Those who need to submit manuscripts should have more patience. Everyone, keep up the good work!

菜博 2022-08-03

The first review provided comments after a month, with one reviewer giving 5 suggestions and the other giving 10 suggestions. Overall, the feedback was quite friendly. After making revisions for a month, the revised version was sent back. Surprisingly, it was accepted in less than a month. The editorial process was quite fast, and everything went smoothly.

chenyang.. 2022-07-29

I want to ask if this journal has a WORD template. It's my first submission.

chenyang.. 2022-07-29

I want to ask if this journal has a WORD template. Please kindly provide it.

adu814 2022-07-28

What result do you give to you?

hezy 2022-07-19

Too slow, it has been 4 months since submission, Required Reviews Completed for almost a month.

yangying98 2022-07-17

Are you rejected after sending it for external review or directly rejected?

yangying98 2022-07-16

No editor, made the decision in two days directly, anyone in the same situation as me?

Hiker 2022-07-02

6.17 Submission
6.18 With editor
7.3 Under review
7.27 Major revision - Given about a month and a half to make revisions. One reviewer had a relatively positive opinion, while the other was not very optimistic and requested many additional experiments. It was tough.
9.9 Revision submitted
9.23 Accepted - Thank you to the editor and reviewers!

愿祖国与天同寿 2022-07-01

6-5 submission
6-6 with editor

一心想毕业的科研小白 2022-06-30

Submission experience:
6.16 Submitted
6.17 With editor