Verified Reviews - Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

LiamZhang 2022-11-10

Submission Experience:
2022.8.15 submitted
2022.8.19 with editor
2022.8.24 under review
2022.9.14 required reviews completed
2022.9.14 decision in process
2022.9.19 major revision
2022.10.15 submitted revised manuscript
2022.10.18 with editor
2022.10.21 under review
2022.10.31 required reviews completed
2022.11.1 decision in process
2022.11.6 completed accept

LFFF 2022-10-27

Ah, I haven't rushed it. This journal is so slow, I don't know if it's because of the overseas epidemic.

1个小菜鸟 2022-10-23

Did you follow up after completing the required reviews?

鸿以 2022-10-23

"required reviews completed" - this status has been going on for two weeks now!

1个小菜鸟 2022-10-21

Has the decision in process been made?

爱吃饭的饭 2022-10-16

Hello, may I ask if you have received a reminder for the manuscript submission? I have been under review for almost four months without any changes. I am in the same situation as you, under review for the same amount of time.

serendipity2022 2022-10-14

I also submitted my work three days ago and it has reached the dip stage. I guess it's not going well.

Bryce_z 2022-10-10

20220923 Delivery
20220926 Rejection
Reason for rejection: High similarity rate
It was an improvement on a previously published conference paper, but I forgot to cite my own conference paper, resulting in the following response.
Elsevier uses the 'Crosscheck' software ... the check carried out shows a level of overlap that indicates that there is limited originality ...

江南 2022-10-09

Sharing my submission experience, this only represents my personal thoughts.

From submission to acceptance, I have been following everyone's updates on this website, so I also want to share the process.

April: Submission
June: Feedback received, major revisions
July: Revised version submitted
August: Second review completed
September: Acceptance notice received

The whole submission process went quite smoothly. Some small tips are, if you don't have much confidence in your English, it's better to ask teachers for more advice and use grammar correction software. Also, pay attention to your tone when replying to reviewers.

Wishing everyone good news!

在你的心上 2022-09-30

After waiting for four months, the result of the first review is out, and it has been rejected. Three reviewers provided a total of 16 comments, including shortcomings. I'm not sure if it's because my English expression is not good enough or the reviewers didn't read carefully. Some of the comments mentioned the need for additional content, which actually already exists in my paper (for example, 1. Describing the meaning of different colors in the figures, which is already explained in my paper. 2. They mentioned that my table data is incomplete and I used "-" to represent certain indicators. However, out of the 15 papers I referenced, three of them also did not provide the AUC indicator. Should I just make up the data myself?). They also raised a ridiculous point, saying that I did not reference recent literature such as RV-GAN and Bridge-Net in my paper... In the section where I compared evaluation metrics, I cited 7 papers from 2021 and 2022 (not including the review articles). Furthermore, the two papers mentioned by the reviewer have higher metrics than mine. Do I have to cite them to prove that my method is not good? The most fatal flaw mentioned is that the paper lacks innovation in the methodology, including existing methods, and the English expression is not natural. I can accept this criticism. Goodbye, I will submit to the next journal.

GaiT 2022-09-29

So has everyone who has submitted experienced this? Is this another new reviewer that has been found? It's too torturous, this submission.

高晓辉 2022-09-29

7.10 Major revision
8.25 Submission return: Three reviewers, 40+ questions, response letter longer than the main text
9.7 Minor revision: First reviewer has no issues, second reviewer refuses review, third reviewer points out grammar issues and suggests adjusting the structure of the article (as the discussion section includes figures, it is requested to move them to the results section)
9.21 Submission return
9.26 Under review (stayed with the editor for three days, assigned a new reviewer, unclear if it is an additional one or returned to the third reviewer)

zzzzsss 2022-09-28

After careful consideration, I have decided to withdraw the submission and submit it to an open-source journal. This magazine is good, but it is just too slow. My studies are more important, so I should find a faster one to submit to. If everyone has enough time, they can wait. By the way, the support team is really fast in handling. I sent an email to the editor in the morning and received a response in the afternoon. Unfortunately, it was all formalities. I don't feel like it was a response from the journal, but rather from a customer service representative.

Qinsuki 2022-09-23

Reminder, if there is no news next week, I plan to remind again. Researcher Support processes very quickly.

在你的心上 2022-09-23

My decision has been in process for over a month and still has no result.

Qinsuki 2022-09-23

Should urge a bit, I have been waiting for a week without receiving the review comments for "Required Reviews Completed". I went to urge yesterday, and today it immediately changed to "Decision in Process".

在你的心上 2022-09-21

Seven months is so terrifying, I also applied for artificial intelligence in medical imaging. Suddenly feeling very anxious.

jessicazc 2022-09-20

Feb 07, 2022 submit - Submitted on February 7, 2022
Feb 08, 2022 with editor - Under editor's review on February 8, 2022
Apr 02, 2022 under review - Under review since April 2, 2022
Jun 19, 2022 under review - Still under review as of June 19, 2022
Jul 12, 2022 Major Revision - Major revision requested on July 12, 2022
Jul 19, 2022 response submitted - Response submitted on July 19, 2022
Jul 23, 2022 under review - Still under review as of July 23, 2022
Jul 29, 2022 Required Reviews Completed - Required reviews completed on July 29, 2022
Jun 31, 2022 Decision in Process - Decision being processed as of June 31, 2022 (Note: June 31st is not a valid date. It may be a typo)
Aug 08, 2022 Minor Revision - Minor revision requested on August 8, 2022
Aug 11, 2022 Minor Revision Submission - Minor revision submitted on August 11, 2022
Sep 18, 2022 Accept - Accepted on September 18, 2022

Share my submission experience, the content was about artificial intelligence medical image processing, it took more than seven months, couldn't find reviewers, and it was sent for review two months after submission. Then followed a long round of major and minor revisions, luckily the final result was good.

爱吃饭的饭 2022-09-19

I have also been under review for three months. There hasn't even been a decision in process, and the dates haven't changed. It's too slow; I want to cry.

一心想毕业的科研小白 2022-09-19

I have been in this state for 20 days as well.

在你的心上 2022-09-19

Before, when I observed others submitting, it would take around one to two months to receive the first-instance results, and three to four months to obtain the second-instance results. Now, it has been almost four months since I submitted my own application, and I still haven't received the first-instance results. I'm really anxious. It has been over a month since it says "Decision in Process," but there is still no news...

爱吃饭的饭 2022-09-17

I have been submitting for four months now and there is no news at all.

在你的心上 2022-09-15

I envy you. It has been four months since I submitted my application, but I still haven't received the first round of results.

在你的心上 2022-09-15

Is there any result? I have also been waiting for four months. Now it has been a full month since the decision is in process, but I still haven't received any result.

在你的心上 2022-09-15

I submitted on June 4th, had the editor assigned on June 8th, was under review on July 4th, and on August 15th, it was in the decision process. Until now, it is still in this state. It's really slow.

lower 2022-09-15

You will definitely be slow in Area 2. If you invest in an open-source, it will be faster.

zzzzsss 2022-09-15

The speed is so slow, so slow. Friends who have requirements for speed should be cautious when submitting. Submitted on 8.20, with editor on 8.21, and it is still with the editor as of 9.15. It has been nearly a month. Looking at the comments, even the external review is slow. I'm getting sick of it. The anxiety of not having a research paper in my third year of graduate school is overwhelming.

爱吃饭的饭 2022-09-13

May I ask how you are doing now? I have also been under review for almost three months, and the status has not changed.

爱吃饭的饭 2022-09-13

Excuse me, how are you doing? I have also been under review for nearly three months, and there hasn't been any change in my status.

夜空中最亮的星 2022-09-13

I'm also in a life-threatening situation for eight months.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now