Verified Reviews - Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

lian 2023-04-17

2023.02.02 Submitted to Journal
2023.02.03 With Editor
2023.02.07 Under Review
2023.03.01 Decision in Process
2023.03.05 Major Revision
2023.03.31 Submitted to Journal
2023.04.01 With Editor
2023.04.12 Required Reviews Completed
2023.04.15 Accept
The review process is quite fast. Wishing all friends an early acceptance.

xyz911015 2023-04-17

Excuse me, do we have any results now?

xyz911015 2023-04-17

May I ask if you were given the revised resubmission comments after the review?

nuuuli 2023-04-15

Excuse me, everyone. What does "refusal followed by acceptance of resubmission" mean? Is it true that the probability of resubmission is not very high?

灌水臭臭 2023-03-27

2.25 Submission
3.3 with editor
3.6 under review
4.12 Required Reviews Completed
4.30 major revision

3909w 2023-03-18

Has your submission status changed now?

1个小菜鸟 2023-03-13

Decision in Process, it has been two weeks, a torturous wait........

3909w 2023-03-10

I was rejected and then submitted to this journal. I feel that the efficiency of the two journals is very different. I submitted to this journal at the end of February, but there has been no response at all. Previously, when I submitted to Physics in Medicine and Biology, it was sent for review in less than a week. I suggest that if you are in a hurry to get accepted and have a well-written article, you can consider submitting to Physics in Medicine and Biology. It may be more difficult, but the speed is very fast.

晴天199 2023-03-08

After working with the editor for two months, I sent an email to urge them. Only then did it change to "under review." I hope to receive feedback for revisions soon, and then I will make changes accordingly.

xiaoxiao 2023-03-07

The amount of submissions has increased greatly, I'm crying to death.

wzy7421 2023-03-07

Ah ah ah, so you're withdrawing your submission? I only submit to non-OA journals. Sigh, it's giving me a headache.

爱吃花生的猫咪 2023-03-07

It is better not to submit to this journal recently. The editor has not reviewed for a long time, and the layout has been full due to the absence of issues. The number of submissions to this journal has skyrocketed since last year. Besides, this is a non-OA journal. If you really want to submit quickly, you can consider the special issue of this journal, which is indexed the same as the regular issues and has no difference.

wzy7421 2023-03-06

28th with editor is now continuous.

booya 2023-03-05

That's right, it has been several months with the editor before it is under review.

爱吃花生的猫咪 2023-03-04

If you are in a hurry to hire, do not submit any articles to internet celebrity magazines, they are really disappointing.

爱吃花生的猫咪 2023-03-04

This journal should not be submitted to recently, as it is quite slow, especially after being promoted to the second tier. I submitted my manuscript in early January, and it is still with the editor. I can only withdraw it now. I have emailed the editor multiple times but have never received a reply. The experience is extremely poor, so I suggest that those who are in a hurry to graduate should not submit to this journal.

灌水臭臭 2023-02-28

Submitted on the evening of the 25th, stuck on the same card.

wzy7421 2023-02-27

Is there still hope for this to be submitted to the journal on the evening of the 23rd?

爱吃饭的饭 2023-02-24

2.23 under review.

爱吃饭的饭 2023-02-20

I sent an email requesting a change of reviewer, but he said he couldn't find another reviewer. He asked for the previous reviewer's feedback as soon as possible, but then there was no further communication. I am considering withdrawing the submission.

控飘 2023-02-17

Generally, after three days with the editor, it will be under review.

给你剥个柚子 2023-02-15

Is the original poster (OP) immediately rejected after being with the editor? Does the status change to "under review" at any point?

能来几个二区就满足了 2023-02-14

2022.12.15 submitted
2022.12.18 with editor
2022.12.24 under review
2022.02.11 major revision Four reviewers, overall approve of the article's content, but require image modifications and more detailed explanations for certain sections. It is recommended to run another dataset.

控飘 2023-02-13

The last dip will be on February 8, 2023.

控飘 2023-02-13

2022.11.16 with editor
2022.12.8 decision in process
2022.12.18 major revision: Two reviewers, one affirming the paper's innovation, and one affirming the quality of the article.
2022.12.29 with editor
2023.1.15 decision in process
2023.1.25 minor revision: Some minor issues with the images.
2023.1.29 with editor
2023.1.8 decision in process
2023.2.11 Accept!
Except for the last acceptance, the previous "decision in process" lasted exactly 10 days, with the results given in the evening.

幸毛虎 2023-02-13

You sent an email, I misunderstood. It's just that there is a problem with the editing, a certain reviewer is not responding, so you can find another reviewer.

幸毛虎 2023-02-13

So, you have been delaying as a reviewer, and I have been delaying as an editor. The reviewer's comments came back early. Haven't you sent an email to inquire?

爱吃饭的饭 2023-02-12

Two reviewers received the manuscript. One reviewer completed the review in a few days, while the other reviewer has not provided any feedback and has delayed for 9 months. The system sent emails to inquire, but there were no useful results.

不甜 2023-02-12

I have already received two articles, and overall, the reviewers' opinions are quite professional. The editors are also very responsible and the processing speed is relatively fast. It is a good journal in the field of bioinformatics.

幸毛虎 2023-02-12

Is there anything special about 9 months?

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started