wzy0614 2022-02-25

2021.12.01 Submission
2022.02.02 Major revision
2022.02.21 Major revision submission
Two reviewers, with relatively positive comments, currently awaiting the results of the major revision.

妈妈咪呀 2022-02-20

2022.02.20 Accepted, the second review took nearly two months, and the reviewer accepted it directly.

kino 2022-02-16

The editor-in-chief has changed...

lavinia 2022-02-15

There may be significant differences in the opinions of the reviewers, so it is necessary to seek the opinions of other reviewers. Good luck!

jayzzzz 2022-02-14

Hello, I submitted it on January 25th, and then on February 8th, it changed to "required review completed". On February 12th, it changed to "under review" again. May I ask if there is a high possibility of tragedy?

lavinia 2022-02-14

1.24 Submission
1.27 Under Review
2.10 Required Reviews Complete
2.11 Decision in Progress
2.13 Notification of Major Revision, with four reviewers

Very, very fast. Although the Editor-in-Chief requested major revisions, the comments from the reviewers were still quite positive. From submission to receiving feedback, it took only about 20 days, which is extremely fast!

18810900935 2022-02-14

The first draft does not have a fixed format, just follow the typesetting that you write yourself.

Sunshinepenn 2022-02-13

May I ask how to obtain the correct format for revising documents?

稻荷化狐 2022-02-08

Middle-of-the-road. Submitted in June last year, received feedback at the end of October, returned in February 6th this year, and the outcome is unknown. Typically takes around 6 months.

jack_wu 2022-02-03

Posted on July 14, 2021
Notified of major revisions on September 29, 2021, with three weeks given for modifications.
Accepted on February 2, 2022.
During the process, there were also two rounds of minor revisions.
There were five reviewers, and the issues raised by the first four reviewers were easily addressed. The fifth reviewer mainly focused on the motivation and the necessity of the research.
Overall, the journal has a high quality, and the reviewers' questions were very professional and helpful for the article.

Roking 2022-01-26

2021.11.19 Submission
2021.12.16 First review, Under review
2022.07.13 Major revision
2022.08.02 Major revision returned
2022.08.05 Second review, Under review
2022.08.25 Decision in Process

天晴Up 2022-01-23

I haven't submitted my manuscript yet. I would like to ask how fast the review process is? How long does it typically take?

18810900935 2022-01-22

11.15 Submission
12.16 Major revision, 6 reviewers
Revised on 1.5 next year
Submitted on 1.7
Reviewed on 1.16
Accepted on 1.21

妈妈咪呀 2021-12-30

The reputation of the BME field is still decent, and it has also risen to the 2nd tier of the engineering category.
Submission timeline:
September 16, 2021: Submission
December 16, 2021: Request for major revisions (20 days)
December 27, 2021: Submission of major revisions
December 29, 2021: Under review

Komorebi123 2021-11-03

2021.7.21 Submission
2021.9.22 Request for major revision
2021.10.8 Submission of major revision
2021.10.25 Review completed
2021.11.2 Acceptance
Topic: Filtering and processing of electrophysiological signals
From submission to acceptance took about 100 days, which is quite fast. There were a total of three reviewers. When the first round of review was completed, two of them had positive opinions from the beginning and required minimal modifications. The third reviewer raised several questions, mostly related to the motivation and reasons behind the study, but they were also easily addressed. In the second round of review, all three reviewers agreed directly, although the third reviewer still seemed reluctant and found the paper complex and difficult to understand.

curiosity 2021-09-19

2021 6.1 Submission
2021 7.17 Received minor revision comments
2021 7.30 Submitted revised version
2021 9.7 Received acceptance notification

投的都中 2021-08-31

Hello, may I ask if you used the template of this journal when submitting? Can I submit in Word format? Can I submit in double columns?

投的都中 2021-08-31

May I ask if this journal requires double-column format for manuscript submission? Or can I directly submit the content without using a template?

稻荷化狐 2021-08-30

Submitted on June 12th, it is still Under Review until now.

脑机小能手 2021-08-15

2021 4 26 Submission
2021 6.24 Minor revisions returned
2021.7.1 Minor revisions submitted
Accepted after over two weeks
The work is in the field of brain-computer interfaces and deep learning. The review process was average in terms of speed, and feedback from five reviewers was positive. After making minor revisions, the paper was submitted and eventually accepted. Although the entire process was lengthy, it was overall relatively easy. Currently, the journal's impact factor continues to rise and it is now a gatekeeper in the second quartile. It is worth submitting to! Thanks to the editors and reviewers of this journal for helping me graduate successfully!

科研界的痞老板 2021-06-17

2020 12.5 Submission
2021 3-4 Entered into the review process
2021 5/1 Decision in process
2021 5/7 Major revisions
2021 5/20 Revised and resubmitted
2021 5/21 With editor
2021 5/26 Under review
2021 6/11 Decision in process
2021 6/16 Accepted
Topic: Interdisciplinary Applications of Deep Learning
It took nearly 8 months from submission to acceptance, which was not very fast, but the reviewers were very professional and their suggestions greatly helped improve my article. Congratulations to the journal for entering the Engineering Class 2 Zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences! The impact factor is continuously increasing, keep up the good work!

Bronson 2021-06-05

2021.2.4 Submission
2021.4.6 Received notification of major revision
2021.4.25 Submitted revised version
2021.5.7 Received notification of minor revision
2021.5.19 Submitted revised version
2021.5.30 Decision in process
2021.6.5 Received acceptance notification

Direction: Physiological signal processing + deep learning
Possibly due to the number of reviewers in this field, the review process was fast. The major revision incorporated feedback from three reviewers (out of five selected), as well as many language-related comments from the editor. The editor was strict and asked detailed questions. The response letter to the reviewers for the major revision was around eight or nine pages long, as there were many questions. However, the reviewers' questions were professional and directly addressed the main issues. (Almost all three reviewers had a profound understanding of deep learning. It seems that there might be many reviewers in this field, but the questions were also very professional and troublesome.)

This journal already has an impact factor in the second quartile, and the latest version from the Chinese Academy of Sciences also categorizes this journal as a second quartile journal. The quality of the journal is guaranteed, and the reviewers are indeed very professional. Of course, this is also very satisfying.

小鱼钓猫 2021-04-17

One month has passed since the completion of the first trial, and the status is still "Decision in Process". Is there anyone else in the same situation as me? The waiting is making people anxious.

lhqllh 2021-03-29

At the beginning, it is normal for the submission to stay with the editor for one to two months. If it requires major revisions, it usually takes around two weeks to a month for it to be returned. If it requires minor revisions, it is usually returned within a few days to around ten days.

我在写论文。。。 2021-03-28

With editor for 15 days, and still no response. Should I withdraw the submission?
OP, how long has your submission been with the editor?

lhqllh 2021-03-27

2020.8.2 Submission
Major revision on October 5, 2020, submitted in early November
Major revision again on February 8, 2021, submitted on February 26
Minor revision on March 22, 2020, accepted on March 26
The review process for journals is really long, and I was very anxious waiting for it, but the reviewers were quite professional. It's still a joy for me to have my second SCI paper during my master's program.

MichaelLin 2021-03-23

I have experienced nearly 9 months of two major revisions and now it has become "Decision in process". Have you gone through this state, OP?

Nightsoul 2021-03-07

2020/8/31 Submission
2020/11/01 Major Revision
2020/12/11 Re-submit
2021/03/07 Accept

I was surprised to be accepted directly after the major revision. It was worth waiting for so long. The major revision included a lot of content regarding epilepsy detection in brainwaves, and it was reviewed very carefully with over 10 pages of revision notes.

清水Xuu 2021-02-09

2020.08.25 Submission
2020.10.24 Feedback - Major revisions
2020.12.29 Submission - Major revisions
2021.01.23 Feedback - Minor revisions
2021.02.02 Submission - Minor revisions
2021.02.09 Accepted

The direction is image processing, specifically lesion detection based on deep learning. There were a total of three reviewers. The first reviewer raised nine questions with a somewhat indifferent attitude. The second and third reviewers each had four to five questions, with more positive attitudes. A very thorough response of over ten pages and more than 5000 words was provided, almost reaching the length of the paper. After the second review, the first reviewer raised four more questions, but there were no issues from the second and third reviewers. Another careful response was provided, and it was accepted one week later.

Overall, the review process was relatively fast, and the reviewers were not deliberately difficult. The editorial handling was also quite prompt.

YJW342 2021-01-19

2020.04 Submission,
2020.08 Major revision submission,
2020.12 Minor revision submission,
2021.01 Acceptance notification

The direction is focused on the processing and analysis of human physiological signals, based on an extension of a BSPC article published by others. Experimental work was conducted, and some statistical and machine learning analyses were performed on the data. However, the level of innovation was perceived as average. The first round of review resulted in a total of 11 comments from three reviewers, each requiring additional calculations. The revised manuscript, along with a response letter spanning approximately 20 pages, was submitted. After a second round of review, which took nearly 4 months, only one additional reference was requested. Following the submission of the minor revisions, acceptance was notified after approximately two weeks.