shuaishuaiyu 2022-12-19

May I ask how long the "under review" process will take for you? It has also been three months for me.

cyanine 2022-12-16

22.12.11 submit;
22.12.16 with editor
Next is the Spring Festival, I don't know if it will take two months to review or reject.

cyanine 2022-12-16

Bro, I submitted it on 12.11. Can you confirm if this journal takes one month for review or not?

duiduizhang 2022-12-14

22.12.07 submit; - Submitted on December 22nd, 2007.
22.12.08 with editor - With editor on December 22nd, 2008.
22.12.14 with wditor - With editor on December 22nd, 2014.

咩小力 2022-12-13

Has it been submitted for review now?

pingesam 2022-12-11

11.2 submit
11.6 with editor
12.10 under review
11.30, 12.6 urged twice and finally sent for review

是张小花 2022-12-09

2022.7.30 Submission
2022.9.3 Major revision (8 reviewers, around 70 comments)
2022.10.13 Revised
2022.11.9 Minor revision (also need to supplement animal experiments)
2022.12.5 Revised
2022.12.9 Accept
There have been obstacles along the way, but I am just grateful.

油焖小龙虾 2022-12-09

It has been a month, still with the editor, feeling frustrated.

咩小力 2022-12-07

What is the current situation? Has it been submitted for review or not?

咩小力 2022-12-07

I really can't wait anymore. Next year, I have to submit a lot of papers for graduation requirements. Now, I really regret choosing this. You submitted earlier than me, let me know when you send it for review, okay?

咩小力 2022-12-07

This journal is so slow. I submitted it on November 14th, and it's still "with editor" and the status hasn't changed at all. After reading everyone's comments, I feel disheartened. If they are going to reject it, they should do it quickly. They haven't even sent it for review, what are they thinking? Some internet users also mentioned that they reject it as soon as they request an update. So should I wait or not? It's really frustrating. It has been such a long time already, but if I continue to wait, it will take forever. And there are cases where "with editor" status lasted for two months and then got rejected. It's truly speechless.

33mia 2022-11-25

Is the 5-day review you mentioned and the one-month review you urged for both about biomaterial?

pingesam 2022-11-24

I submitted my previous article for review in just 5 days. Another article from our team was rushed and submitted for review the next day after a month of reminders. As for my current article, it was submitted on November 2nd and is still "with editor" while other articles submitted around the same time have already been reviewed. This efficiency is really too low.

33mia 2022-11-24

11.24 with editor.
It is incredibly slow. If it is not sent for review next week, I will withdraw the submission.
Other journals reject within one or two weeks, but Biomaterials likes to drag it out. I have seen two brothers waiting for two months with editor on another platform, and after I urged them, the editor immediately rejected them with a template. I must have lost my mind to submit to Biomaterials. I will not submit or cite it in the future.

shuaishuaiyu 2022-11-21

How long has the OP been under review?

33mia 2022-11-17

This journal is really slow.
November 2 with editor
November 17 with editor

blcl 2022-11-08

What is the current status of the original poster? Has it been submitted for review?

是张小花 2022-10-25

May I ask if it takes a month to review the repair? My repair has been under review for over ten days, and I'm afraid it will be rejected.

DDUCKY 2022-10-21

I have been submitting for 12 days and currently still in the "with editor" status.

DDUCKY 2022-10-21

20221009 submission
Not yet reviewed

Hemery 2022-10-12

8.3 under review
8.22 minor revision
9.6 submit after supplementary experiments
9.30 minor revision (format and some discussion issues)
10.5 accepted
The initial review process took longer, probably due to a large number of manuscripts in queue, but the overall speed was fast afterward.

wuhao1 2022-10-03

Have you received the email for review?

wuhao1 2022-10-03

May I ask if sending the interface for review means sending it to two reviewers as well?

Accept619 2022-09-30

7.7 submission, 8.2 first review comments received, editor requested revisions by 9.30, revised manuscript uploaded and responded to comments on 9.20, accepted on 9.29.

The two reviewers raised a total of eighty-nine questions, all of which were explicitly recommended for acceptance during the first review. The experiments that needed to be supplemented were relatively simple except for the animal experiments, which were more complex. Our research project has a large amount of data, and various mechanistic experiments have been verified from multiple angles, with detailed work.

Originally, we thought that it might not be submitted for review, or it would take at least six months to be accepted. However, due to the increasing influence in recent years, it has become more and more difficult to submit. The result was surprisingly fast. The impact factor for this year has increased to 15.3, and the quality of the articles published in Biomaterials is also very good and highly recognized. I wish Biomaterials continued success!

kauidianzhong 2022-09-19

Is it true that the review process is very quick, but if it needs to be rejected, it will be delayed for a month and then rejected?

cocoa1008 2022-09-13

9.13 under review

冬梅酱紫 2022-09-13

9.13 Rejection

冬梅酱紫 2022-09-10

9.10 avec l'éditeur translates to "9.10 with editor" in English.

迷鹿南北 2022-09-09

9.9 Rejected, over 20 days, not submitted for review, rejected manuscript.

迷鹿南北 2022-09-06

2022.9.6 avec l'éditeur (2022.9.6 with editor)