Mtroy 2021-08-31

At that time, it was 1400 Swiss francs, equivalent to 10,000 Chinese yuan. Now it is 1600 Swiss francs.

zsy-ujs 2021-07-11

6.22: Submitted
7.08: Minor Revision (Editor decision: Accept after minor revision)
7.09: Resubmitted
7.10: Accept

xyrbah 2021-07-05

Formally submitted on June 10th, revised three times with a deadline of three days. I took approximately one day each time to make the revisions. Accepted on July 5th.

ICE1234567890 2021-07-01

I also submitted, got rejected, but the journal editor asked me to resubmit after major revisions, I don't know if I can get accepted.

QAZZAQ 2021-06-27

Really speechless, the second review was rejected, the questions raised by the reviewer are really unprofessional, I suggest everyone not to submit, really irresponsible. The page fee is expensive, and after two months of submission, do they not consider other people's time? Moreover, the English of the editor is a bit Chinese-style, maybe it was easy to submit before, but now it's really not good to submit. Small partners who want to try their luck should just give up...

h70w 2021-05-03

System submission on April 4, 2021.
Editorial rejection on April 8, 2021. The following are the reasons for rejection:

We are writing to inform you that we will not be able to process your submission further. Submissions sent for peer-review are selected on the basis of discipline, novelty, and general significance, in addition to the usual criteria for publication in scholarly journals. Therefore, our decision is not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your work.

The process was fast, but the publication fee is relatively high.

二三三 2021-03-29

May I ask how much is the remuneration?

幻灭星城 2021-03-22

The review process was fast, but still relatively responsible.

The original Chinese manuscript was originally submitted to a prestigious domestic journal. The reviewers estimated that it was reviewed by students and did not carefully review it. They provided a bunch of irrelevant review comments. Some said that my results were problematic, even though they did not look at the evaluation criteria. The editorial team rejected it based on their opinions. I was frustrated and didn't want to deal with the editorial team and these reviewers anymore. So I translated and submitted it to Agriculture. I submitted it on February 10th and received the first round of comments 18 days later, with a request to revise within 10 days. I couldn't wait for 10 days, so I revised it in 3 days. I wrote a reply to the comments, which ended up being around 10 pages long. Although it felt like writing another mini paper, I had to do it because the reviewers had some specific and challenging comments that needed serious replies. After the revision, it took another ten days for both the reviewers and the editorial team to come to a satisfactory conclusion. It was then accepted for publication. It took a few more days for proofreading and typesetting, totaling 31 days. One more day and it wouldn't have been within a month.

Enperorzyp 2021-03-05

Open source review is still fast, minor revisions have been made. Reviewers are still responsible.

Mtroy 2021-02-27

The journal is very meticulous. The external reviewer suggested minor revisions, and then three rounds of modifications were made. The suggestions provided were all quite good. From submission to acceptance, it took exactly two months and one day.