Verified Reviews - Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

qin0123 2022-09-08

7.16 submitted to journal
7.18 with editor
7.22 under review
8.9 required reviewers completed
8.10 major revision
9.2 revised
9.3 with editor
9.4 under review
9.5 required reviewers completed
9.6 accepted

qin0123 2022-09-08

The review process is very fast, and the editing speed is also very fast.

Foxxx 2022-09-08

I am a submission recommended by CEJ for rejection and transferred to another journal. When submitting, I also attached CEJ's comments for revision. After making major revisions, it was resubmitted on August 29th. Until today, it is still under review. On September 18th, I received a direct acceptance email.

Ocean 2022-09-08

It's been 19 days. I'm really fed up with this reviewer, sigh.

Ocean 2022-09-08

It's been 19 days already, I really can't believe this reviewer, sigh.

一区区区区区 2022-09-06

I am one of the five reviewers. I returned the revised version on August 12th. On August 17th, 18th, and 19th, the status remained as RRC (unchanged status, only the dates changed). Suddenly, on August 21st, it changed to "under review". According to online experiences, this usually means it has been sent to a new reviewer for arbitration. However, just a few days later, on August 29th, it was accepted.

Wangwant 2022-09-03

9.1 submitted
9.2 with editor
9.10 rejection

Francis wu 2022-09-02

8.29 with editor: This means that as of August 29th, the text is being reviewed by an editor.

9.2 under review: This means that as of September 2nd, the text is currently being reviewed.

mrvita 2022-09-01

Excuse me, experts, is there a chance for this journal to be listed in the top tier at the end of the year?

Ocean 2022-09-01

Giovanni PALMISANO

Shuang Wu 2022-09-01

May I ask which editor you are?

张建零零柒 2022-09-01

July 19th is already under review, and the current result is unknown. It feels a bit lengthy.

Ocean 2022-08-31

7.11 submitted to journal
7.17 with editor
7.19 under review
8.13 major revision (three reviewers, two of whom had manageable questions that required a small experiment to address, but due to the pandemic and the closure of schools, it was not possible to conduct the experiment. I explained this in my response)
8.21 revised with editor
8.23 under review
8.31 under review
Looking at the manuscript tracking, I noticed that there are two reviewers this time, and one review has already been completed. I am not sure if the editor raised questions during the initial review or if they assigned two additional reviewers. I am a bit anxious about this situation. Has anyone else experienced this before? Usually, it doesn't take this long to receive a decision after revisions. It has been 10 days and the status remains the same.

Francis wu 2022-08-29

Finally, the days of being stuck are over and the return repair is finally completed. Looking forward to a good outcome.

张建零零柒 2022-08-29

Congratulations, mine is still under review.

小环博一枚 2022-08-29

I benefited greatly from LetPub. Therefore, I am here to share my experience, hoping to help others. The direction of the article is anaerobic fermentation, which is a relatively niche research area. It may be difficult to find reviewers, but there was only one reviewer, and their comments were quite good. The review process took two months in the initial stage, which was a bit long, but the feedback received was worth the wait. This is the submission process, and I will provide further updates later.

2022.7.1 submit
2022.7.7 under review
2022.8.28 major revision
2022.9.18 revised with editor
2022.9.23 under review
2022.9.30 accept
It took 3 months in total.

无限进步 2022-08-22

8.22 under review... can be translated to "8.22 is currently under review..." in English.

leayao35 2022-08-22

Starting from April 8th, with editor, until now on August 22nd, it is still in the state of with editor.

无限进步 2022-08-21

8.20 Required Reviews Completed

无限进步 2022-08-20

The result of waiting is so long, I hope for good luck.

无限进步 2022-08-20

7.19 submit
7.25 under review
8.3 under review
8.17 required reviewer completed
8.19 under review (Feels so slow and long... The whole vacation is spent on this.)

ciaojing 2022-08-15

6.6 submitted to journal
6.6 with editor
6.6 Editor's first decision, the editor directly asked for revisions to reduce the weight.
6.13 Submitted revised manuscript with reduced weight.
6.16 under review
7.18 Required reviewers completed. I feel like I've been waiting for information from reviewer 3, but it hasn't been reviewed yet. It wasted half a month's time.
8.3 Major revision (I should have found more than 4 reviewers, and three reviewers came back with their opinions. One reviewer thought there were no problems, another made simple suggestions that were replied to within 2 hours. The last reviewer had some difficult questions, and it seemed like they were from Pakistan, and they asked to cite a few inappropriate articles.)
8.11 Revised with editor. Overall, the issues were addressed relatively simply, but each problem was still responded to.
8.11 under review
8.15 Required reviewers completed
8.15 accept. All reviewers agree to accept.

王王王 2022-08-15

August 5th with editor, August 15th still with editor.

leayao35 2022-08-11

August 4 with editor, August 11 with editor. There has been no news or updates until now. I have never seen anything like this before.

发20篇SCI的小高 2022-08-11

The first article of my master's degree was a difficult process. Here is a brief record:

6.2 - Submission
6.5 - Assigned manuscript number
6.6 - Peer review
6.28 - Major revision (the opinions of two reviewers were very helpful, so I thought it was stable)
7.6 - Feedback for revision
7.7 - Peer review
7.25 - Major revision (received opinions from 7 additional reviewers, 5 agreed to publish, 1 provided very professional suggestions, and 1 seemed to not understand what I was saying and gave difficult-to-answer comments. I had to respond with determination)
8.8 - Submission and sent for review on the same day
8.10 - Accepted

葫芦娃先生 2022-08-09

The first SCI paper of the PhD took about 4 months from submission to acceptance. Thanks to the editor and reviewers! Hoping JECE can be listed in the top tier. ?

Francis wu 2022-08-08

6.27 submitted to journal - This means that a certain document or manuscript was submitted to a journal on June 27th.

7.30 major revision - This indicates that a major revision or significant changes are required for a certain document or manuscript by July 30th.

xiemei 2022-08-06

Do all authors need to agree before it can be with the editor after submission?

xiemei 2022-08-06

Do all authors need to agree after the submission?

旺仔 2022-08-06

The order seems to be unchangeable, follow the default file order. Even if the order is changed, it will revert back on its own.

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started