Verified Reviews - Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

mrvita 2023-03-31

Cannot reach 10, the overall impact factor has decreased this year, this journal has just passed 7.

Zhou Peng 2023-03-30

The renovation took one month in March, and the review process took another month. There were five reviewers who asked a total of 28 questions.

Zhou Peng 2023-03-30

Received at Editorial Office 25 Nov 2022
Article revised 15 Feb 2023
Article accepted for publication 17 Mar 2023

Translation:

The article was received at the Editorial Office on November 25, 2022. It was revised on February 15, 2023. Finally, the article was accepted for publication on March 17, 2023.

好运中投 2023-03-29

May I ask if there are still any modifications after several rounds of tossing around in the second trial?

我们要注意 2023-03-27

The review process was fast and the opinions were very professional. It went through several rounds and the total duration was 3 and a half months. Investing in this journal, it should be able to achieve an Impact Factor of 10 in 22 years.

2023-03-27

The text "Ur时间变了 是啥意思" translates to "Ur time has changed, what does it mean?" in English.

Noob player 2023-03-27

I haven't encountered this situation before. If you don't feel urgent, you can wait a little bit. I remember my first time with an editor took about 5.6 days.

我要发五分 2023-03-27

It has been half a month since the second revision, and there is still one reviewer who has not accepted the review. Should I send an email to the editor for this matter?

一刀切下魂 2023-03-27

2023.3.17 submitted to journal
2023.3.18 with editor
2023.3.25 under review
2023.4.12 major revision
2023.5.02 with editor
2023.5.05 under review
2023.5.28 accepted

Translation:
2023.3.17 - Submitted to journal
2023.3.18 - Under editor's review
2023.3.25 - Under review
2023.4.12 - Major revision required
2023.5.02 - Under editor's review
2023.5.05 - Under review
2023.5.28 - Accepted

Noob player 2023-03-27

Forgot to rate the journal, could have given it a 10, submitted twice, positive review.

Noob player 2023-03-27

Submitted on February 1, 2022. Revised on March 16, 2022. Accepted on March 27, 2022. Reviewed by two reviewers. This article is very important to me. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Editor-in-Chief Yang Liu for the fast review and handling of the manuscript. Thank you again, Editor Yang Liu, for giving me this opportunity. Wishing the journal continued success!

CHENYANER 2023-03-25

My submission on the 8th, was sent for review on the 14th, and is currently still under review. It has been approximately 7 days in the hands of the editor.

hy 2023-03-24

The opinions were requested four times before and after, and the questions asked were quite pertinent. There is also a high requirement for the originality of the paper.

changboshi 2023-03-23

01.09 Sub - January 9th Submission
01.12 U R - January 12th You Are
03.07 Major revise - March 7th Major Revision
0.3.19 Accept - March 19th Acceptance
整体速度不算特别慢,外审时间比较久,可能找审稿人不太顺利 - The overall speed is not particularly slow, but the external review process takes a long time, possibly due to difficulties in finding reviewers.

一周搬砖6天的小妖怪 2023-03-23

20 is filled, but the status is still "with editor". What is the editor doing? Are they very busy?

辉灰晖灰辉 2023-03-19

May I ask what the result is? Mine is also the same.

辉灰晖灰辉 2023-03-19

3.14 submitted to journal
3.15 with editor
3.18 decision in process

The given text is already in English.

Alev 2023-03-10

Hello, may I ask what minor repairs are you referring to?

wy1996 2023-03-08

Has your submission been reviewed?

一周搬砖6天的小妖怪 2023-03-06

2023.03.04 with Editor

一周搬砖6天的小妖怪 2023-03-04

2023.03.03 Submitted to Journal May the blessings be smooth and the submission be accepted in the end!

小毛驴Y 2023-03-01

Posted on 2022.12.09, reviewed and sent back for revisions within one to two days. Returned for major revisions on 2023.1.30 (two reviewers, one focusing on formatting issues, while the other requested an explanation of the experimental significance of the article, with a total of 48 questions). Returned on 2.09, sent for review on 2.10, and completed on 3.01. Accepted for publication on the same day.

JSCR 2023-02-27

Excuse me, does this journal have a track link? I can't see anything when I open it, only the peer review status.

JSCR 2023-02-27

Does this journal have track links? I can't see anything when I open mine, only the peer review status.

好运中投 2023-02-27

May I ask if the chance of this journal being rejected after submission is high, OP?

任矜持其实不爱吃肉 2023-02-20

Uncertain if it is the reason for switching, judging from the surrounding feedback, this journal has been quite fast recently.

读者665 2023-02-19

I also transferred my application. It was submitted on January 3rd and returned for revision on January 14th. It was resubmitted for revision on February 4th and completed by the RRC on the 12th. It is currently still in the RRC status. The editing process is taking longer, and I don't know when I will receive the feedback.

zhaolf 2023-02-15

Hello, is it true that the transfer pending process is faster after confirmation? I was also asked to transfer, but I am not sure, so I ended up choosing this option myself.

任矜持其实不爱吃肉 2023-02-14

At the end of December, I switched from SPT to the journal and submitted it for review the next day.
On January 8th, it went through initial review, with 2 minor revisions and 1 major revision. The editor provided a major revision and 4 weeks to make the changes.
The revised manuscript was submitted on February 3rd.
It was sent for review on February 5th.
It was accepted on February 9th.
It was published online on February 11th.
The process was very fast, suitable for people who are impatient. (●ˇ∀ˇ●)

Q.11 2023-02-13

submitted 24 October 2022;
under review 30 October 2022
revised 10 December 2022
with editor 3 January 2023
under review 6 January 2023
Accepted 21 January 2023
Available online 23 January 2023

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started