Verified Reviews - Composites Communications
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

Richard 2022-10-07

Submitted on August 31st
Returned for revision on September 20th
Directly hired after revision on October 4th
The speed is very fast, Liu Tianxi's editing efficiency is really high, thank you.

hardlemon 2022-10-05

I feel that this journal is super fast. It was sent for review the day after I submitted it and I received the reviewer's comments within two weeks. After making the necessary revisions and submitting again, it was accepted the next day. It was very quick and took a total of 45 days.

yan1995 2022-09-04

Brother, I was also recommended and transferred to CompositesCommunications by Composites B. After accepting the transfer, I couldn't find the submission in the submission system of CompositesCommunications. Have you encountered this situation, brother?

bubu 2022-08-28

Too slow. It has been two months since I submitted and the status of CCR has not changed. The review process is too slow. If you are in a hurry to graduate, I do not recommend submitting it.

学术小新 2022-08-17

How long does it usually take to submit for review with an editor? Does anyone know?

rambler 2022-08-17

There is no specific requirement for font and font size. The submission cycle refers to the time when the first review comments are received.

bubu 2022-08-10

Your cycle is 3 months.

小崔 2022-08-08

I didn't see any requirements for fonts, font sizes, formatting, and other styles in the author's guidelines. How did you handle this?

rambler 2022-07-30

4.2 Submitted
4.5 Length Requirement
4.6 Submitted
4.10 under review
4.12 under review
5.3 review completed
5.13 review completed
5.13 required review completed
5.17 major revision
6.5 revision submitted
7.4 under review
7.7 under review
7.7 review completed
7.30 accept

Translation:
4.2 Submitted
4.5 Length Requirement
4.6 Submitted
4.10 under review
4.12 under review
5.3 review completed
5.13 review completed
5.13 required review completed
5.17 major revision
6.5 revision submitted
7.4 under review
7.7 under review
7.7 review completed
7.30 accept

gdada 2022-05-29

Translated to English: "Transferred from composites part B and uploaded for four days, accepted directly. Super fast."

March君 2022-04-29

2.18 Submitted to journal
3.05 Submissions sent back to author
3.05 Submitted to journal
3.08 With editor
3.08 Under Review
3.19 Required Reviews Completed
3.26 Required Reviews Completed
3.30 Major Revision
4.26 Revision submitted to journal
4.27 With editor
4.28 Accept
Initially, it was slow, but it became faster once it reached the editor.

世界的尽头 2022-03-22

Your initial length is what the director asked for, I don't know if my 3500 characters will be requested for resubmission.

lc 2022-03-06

May I ask how you deal with font, font size, and other formatting requirements in the author's guide, as I haven't seen any mentioned?

qwer 2021-12-31

2021.10.06 submitted
2021.10.07 with editor
2021.10.18 submission does not meet the length requirement of Short Communication
2021.10.19 resubmitted
2021.10.20 with editor
2021.11.08 under review
2021.11.28 revise
2021.12.22 submitted
2021.12.23 with editor
2021.12.30 accept

研无止境 2021-12-20

Dec 10, 2021 under review
Dec 19, 2021 under review
There was another update of "under review" during this period. May I ask the experts here why the "under review" status keeps changing?

研无止境 2021-11-18

No choice but to edit, or just randomly choose one.

qwer 2021-11-17

May I ask if you have chosen Professor Liu Tianxi or Professor Zhou Limin?

YXT-H 2021-11-15

Hello, may I ask if you have chosen to edit?

研无止境 2021-11-05

Nov 03, 2021 submitted
Nov 04, 2021 with editor
Nov 05, 2021 under review
The editor is quite efficient, looking forward to good results.

听曲散步 2021-10-12

Accepted, except for being a bit slow, everything else is pretty good.

tuanzi 2021-10-11

After being under review for over four months, it was rejected, stating that they couldn't find any reviewers. I feel like the efficiency is extremely low (ಥ﹏ಥ)

tuanzi 2021-10-11

After more than four months of being under review, it was rejected, with the reason given that they couldn't find a reviewer. I feel the efficiency is too low (ಥ﹏ಥ)

听曲散步 2021-10-07

The translation of "速度贼TM的慢" into English is "Damn slow speed."

Mcfly summer 2021-10-02

This journal's self-citation rate is a bit high.

sduer 2021-09-30

It has been over 3 months and there is still no news. This journal is really slow recently. I hope to receive good news!

烦躁 2021-08-26

In the hands of the editor for a bit longer, but the journal is still good.
20 days under review.
30 days major review.
15 days accept.
There is a high requirement for the novelty of the article.

瓜大瓜瓜 2021-08-23

My required reviews were completed exactly one month ago today, but I still haven't received any results. Prior to submission, it took over a month with the editor as well. I'm truly frustrated with this journal.

烦躁 2021-08-19

Too slow, it took 20 days to submit with the editor, and it's been 10 days with the editor for revisions and it's still not submitted for review.

156845 2021-08-09

Is the Chinese Academy of Sciences divided into Zone 1 or Zone 2?

156845 2021-08-09

4.10 submit
4.20 under review
5.21 major
6.5 revise and resubmit
616 accept

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now