爱爱是吧 2023-02-17

My article underwent only one major revision, with a total of three reviewers and a total of 14 review comments. I hope it can be helpful to everyone.

YUANRUITIAN 2023-02-17

Hello classmate, may I ask if you have only undergone one major revision, or have you not had a second revision?

爱爱是吧 2023-02-16

The speed is very fast, and the efficiency is very high.
Submitted on December 20, 2022, revised by three reviewers on January 13, 2023, submitted for modification on January 31, 2023, and accepted on February 16, 2023. The efficiency is extremely high, thumbs up. I wish everyone's paper can be accepted.

AbaqusA 2023-02-08

I also encountered this problem. May I ask if it has been resolved?

JIM-XIANFEN 2023-02-03

It should not work. If you submit it there, it will still be the same editor. It is better to submit to a different journal.

wuheihei 2023-02-02

Because the originality was rejected by the editor and not submitted for review, can it be submitted again?

YUANRUITIAN 2023-01-26

Good luck.

linmo 2023-01-18

Brothers have been hired. The first review took about a month, and the second review was completed within 7 days after the revised manuscript was submitted. Thank you to the diligent reviewers. I highly recommend Professor Yu Qingliang from Wuhan University, who is truly dedicated. Even though it's almost Chinese New Year, he still provided the results promptly. RRC sent the acceptance notification less than a day later.

menbo 2023-01-10

Hello, I would like to ask what needs to be submitted for the revised manuscript after the editor has made the modifications?
1. Reply letter 2. Manuscript (with track changes) 3. Manuscript (clean version)
Do all three need to be submitted?
Thank you!

menbo 2023-01-10

Hello, I would like to ask what needs to be submitted for the revised manuscript after the editor has made the modifications?
1. Response letter 2. Manuscript (with track changes) 3. Manuscript (clean version)
Do all three need to be submitted?
Thank you!

menbo 2023-01-10

Hello, I would like to ask what needs to be submitted for the revised manuscript after the editor has given feedback?
1. Reply letter
2. Manuscript (with tracked changes)
3. Manuscript (clean version)

Do all three need to be submitted?

Qing. 2022-12-31

The journal is very good, the editors are very responsible, but the speed is a little slow.

焦绿猫 2022-12-25

Thank you yangxl1995. I couldn't find the reply option, wondering if it's because I changed my nickname [facepalm].
A few days after being hired, there will be a proof link for online proofreading, where the text and images can be modified.
I'm not sure about the total number of external reviewers (as the boss didn't send me the Track link email). Both the first and second reviewers provide effective comments.

kbo 2022-12-25

Brothers, is there a high chance of JBE being sent for review? It is in the direction of concrete materials.

linmo 2022-12-25

Guys, is the rejection rate for JBE major revisions high?

Qing. 2022-12-25

I received feedback approximately three weeks ago, and it was minor revisions. I have now submitted my response to the feedback.

Li0414 2022-12-23

Original text: 楼主 我也遇到同样情况，请问您结果怎么样

Translation: Original poster, I also encountered the same situation. May I ask about the outcome for you?

chao 2022-12-19

My text has been with editor for 7 days and it is still in the external review stage. How about yours now?

liuqb 2022-12-14

Received at Editorial Office 13 Oct 2022
Article revised 7 Dec 2022 (Second revision submission)
Article accepted for publication 13 Dec 2022 (Submitted for acceptance for 2 months)

奇祁 2022-12-14

I have also encountered this kind of problem, and I don't know how to deal with it.

HSQiao 2022-12-05

The new journal with a rapidly rising impact factor seems to have a very broad scope in terms of the articles it accepts. The handling editor is Dr. James M. LaFave from UIUC, and after submitting, the manuscript went through the stages of being submitted to the journal, reviewed by the editor, and under review within half a day. The efficiency is extremely high. The entire process went through one major revision and one minor revision. One reviewer provided detailed comments while the other gave a more concise outline. The initial review took 2 months, and the second review took less than two weeks. Whenever the reviewers responded with their comments, the editor would process them within approximately 6 hours, entering the RRC (Reviewer Required Changes) status. I truly admire the efficiency of Dr. James M. LaFave.

yangxl1995 2022-12-02

Congratulations, OP!
I would like to ask if there is a need to re-submit the manuscript or highlight any images after being accepted. After receiving the acceptance notification, I couldn't find the entry to submit files on the submission system. Also, last time when I was asked for revisions, there was no request for a clean version submission. Has anyone encountered this issue before? How should I resolve it?

yangxl1995 2022-12-02

Excuse me, after being hired, just waiting for the proof is enough, right? Do I not need to submit the documents, pictures, and highlights again? Last time, I didn't submit the clean version for revision.

yangxl1995 2022-12-02

Congratulations, host. I would like to ask how to submit documents after being hired? I couldn't find the entry to submit documents in the original system.

yangxl1995 2022-12-02

7.31 submit - Submit by July 31st.
10.15 major revise - Major revisions due on October 15th.
11.11 resubmit - Resubmit by November 11th.
12.1 accept - Accepted on December 1st.

I would like to ask, after being accepted, do I need to resubmit the manuscript or highlight any images? After receiving the acceptance notification, I couldn't find the option to submit files on the submission system. Also, during the last revision, there was no request for a clean version to be submitted. Has anyone encountered this issue before? How should I resolve it?

晴天娃娃2022 2022-12-01

The repair speed is so fast, are there only two external reviewers in total?

焦绿猫 2022-12-01

The reason for the slow and cumbersome first review is mainly due to the inability to find a reviewer. Once a reviewer is found, the process becomes much quicker.

kkk58 2022-11-28

11.12 The second reviewer has accepted the manuscript for review, but has not yet provided any feedback. I am unable to understand the situation.

浓缩黑咖啡 2022-11-24

In the proof webpage, it seems that modifications can be made.

晴天娃娃2022 2022-11-22

It has been 3 months since the first review, I have reminded the editor once and received a reply saying that there is only one reviewer. Another 20 days have passed and there is still no progress. Sigh... It's really difficult.