Verified Reviews - Journal of Energy Storage
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

夜未阑 2023-06-02

5.28 submitted to Journal - This means that something (presumably an article or manuscript) was submitted to a journal on May 28th.

6.1 with editor - This means that on June 1st, the submission mentioned earlier is being reviewed or discussed with an editor.

桃子男孩渡海而来 2023-05-29

Classmate, I submitted my work a week earlier than you, and it is still with the editor. Has there been any change on your end?

桃子男孩渡海而来 2023-05-29

2023.5.08 Submit
2023.5.10 With Editor
2023.6.05 Under review
2023.6.25 Major revision
2023.7.10 Resubmit
2023.7.16 Accepted

Translated:
2023.5.08 Submit
2023.5.10 With Editor
2023.6.05 Under review
2023.6.25 Major revision
2023.7.10 Resubmit
2023.7.16 Accepted

三层吉士堡 2023-05-28

2022.10.15 submit
2022.10.20 with editor
2022.12.16 under review Only found one reviewer
2023.01.12 under review The only reviewer returned comments, and the editor has not handled it further since then
2023.03.05 decision
2023.03.06 major revision
2023.03.15 resubmit
2023.03.20 with editor
2023.04.10 under review
2023.04.15 under review Reviewer returned comments
2023.05.01 under review Urgent request for review
2023.05.15 minor revision Had to send a personal email to the editor to request a review, and they quickly provided minor revisions
2023.05.16 resubmit
2023.05.25 required review completed
2023.05.28 accept

纳米光电 2023-05-24

The translation of the text into English is as follows:

Submitted 22 January 2023
Revised 3 April 2023
Accepted 13 May 2023
Online 23 May 2023
Published 23 May 2023

xiaotiejiang 2023-05-21

2023.5.19: Required reviews completed
2023.5.20: Accepted

Very good journal and editor, very fast. I had some delays due to personal matters for half a month, and it happened to be accepted on May 20th. It can be considered as a small gift to myself.

zhang endi 2023-05-20

20230427 Submission
20230501 with editor
20230513 Under Review
20230519 First reviewer provided comments
20230602 First reviewer's comments returned (Editor only provided comments from one person and ended the process)
20230612 Revised version returned
20230614 with editor
20230618 under review
20230620 Reviewer's comments returned
20230703 accept

xiaotiejiang 2023-05-20

2023.5.19 Required Reviews Completed.

xiaotiejiang 2023-05-20

2023.4.3 submit - Submitted on April 3, 2023.
2023.4.8 under review - Under review since April 8, 2023.
2023.4.21 minor revision - Requires minor revisions by April 21, 2023.
2023.5.7 revision submit - Revised version submitted on May 7, 2023.
2023.5.11 under review - Under review since May 11, 2023.

thfdiiii 2023-05-18

2023.02.08 - Submit
2023.04.22 - Major revision
2023.04.30 - Revision submit
2023.05.15 - Accept

Chen xingguang 2023-05-18

Because of this speed, some awards were missed. Ah.

Chen xingguang 2023-05-18

It has been three months since the second review, and it is still under review.

Horace19 2023-05-16

The journal has seen a rapid increase in impact factor over the past two years, with a large number of submissions and longer review times (including the time spent by the editor). All three reviewers are junior colleagues. The first set of comments was received after four months, and both reviewers agreed to accept the submission within about a month. One reviewer provided a second set of comments, and after approximately one month, they also agreed to accept the submission.

Hokir 2023-05-15

The text "2023-05-15 RRC" does not have a clear meaning or context, so it cannot be accurately translated into English. It appears to be a combination of numbers and letters, possibly representing a date and acronym, but without further information, it is impossible to provide an accurate translation.

奔跑的科研小菜鸡 2023-05-15

I am not rushing, wait a little longer. Many journals have become particularly slow now.

纳米光电 2023-05-14

Received at Editorial Office 22 Jan 2023 - The article was received by the editorial office on January 22, 2023.
Article revised 25 Feb - The article was revised on February 25.
Article revision submitted 3 Apr 2023 - The revised version of the article was submitted on April 3, 2023.
Article accepted for publication 13 May 2023 - The article was accepted for publication on May 13, 2023.

宛飞丞 2023-05-13

We are about the same, my friend. Have you followed up? I submitted it on the 19th, and the customer service at Aceville said if there is no progress by next Monday, they suggest I follow up with the editor. Now I'm hesitating whether to follow up or not. The previous submission was reviewed quite quickly, but this time it's very slow.

奔跑的科研小菜鸡 2023-05-11

2023.04.12 Submitted to journal
2023.04.15 With Editor
2023.04.27 With Editor (date changed)
2023.05.11 Still With Editor (so slow)
2023.05.17 Under review (sent to 3 reviewers, 0 accepted)
2023.05.20 Under review (changed from 3 reviewers to 4 reviewers, 0 accepted)
2023.05.23 Under review (changed from 4 reviewers to 5 reviewers, 0 accepted)
2023.05.26 Under review (changed from 5 reviewers to 7 reviewers, 0 accepted) So difficult
2023.05.29 Under review (changed from 7 reviewers to 9 reviewers, 0 accepted) So difficult

lizeyang 2023-05-10

May I ask how many suggestions were made for your Energy Storage Journal during the three major revisions?

菜狗 2023-05-10

I think the main reason is the change of editor-in-chief.

lizeyang 2023-05-10

How many suggestions do you have for the second round of revisions?

科研小睿 2023-05-09

12.27 under review
2023.03.03 Two reviewers, a total of 16 comments, major revisions
04.27 under review
Hoping for everything to go smoothly, must pass for sure...

Bright001 2023-05-03

The given text "23.05.03 Accept!" is already in English.

Hokir 2023-05-03

Brother, why would we still be rejected after major repairs? Did the editor provide any reasons?

菜狗 2023-05-03

December投
February major repairs
March dip
May reject

Hokir 2023-04-30

20230421 R1 submit translates to "Submitted on April 21, 2023, Revision 1" in English.
20230430 under review translates to "Under review as of April 30, 2023" in English.

dikesen 2023-04-28

2.17 under review
3.4 Major maintenance
3.24 resubmit
3.26 under review
4.28 accept
Lasted for 4 months and 3 days.

豆腐 2023-04-23

submit 2022 12.16 - Submission deadline is December 16, 2022.
major 2023 1.26 - Major decision will be made on January 26, 2023.
submit 2023.2.12 - Submission deadline is February 12, 2023.
accept 2023 4.22 - Acceptance notification will be sent on April 22, 2023.

jishuwen 2023-04-16

4.15 online

sssj 2023-04-14

22.11.28 submitted
23.01.10 major revision
23.02.15 revision submitted
23.03.22 minor revision
23.04.01 revision submitted
23.04.14 accept

The overall review process of the journal is relatively slow. After submission, it takes an average of 1 week for the paper to be under review, and it takes about 40 days to receive feedback.

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started