Verified Reviews - Journal of Energy Storage
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

武器大师成龙 2021-12-23

The meaning of "Required Reviews Completed" is that the review comments have been returned and we are awaiting the decision of the editor.

dawang 2021-12-23

The instant Impact Factor (IF) in 2021 is approximately around 8.

求求大家别卷了 2021-12-22

May I ask when did you submit your application on October 17th and how long did it take for it to be under review? What date did it become under review?

求求大家别卷了 2021-12-22

2021.11.14 submission
2021.11.15 with editor
2021.12.22 still with editor
May I ask how long it takes for all of you to get reviewed? This article is about battery research.

圆圆圆圆噗 2021-12-22

2021.12.17 Required Reviews Completed

First time seeing this status, it's a bit strange.

Yueran Ma 2021-12-20

June 11, 2021 - Submitted to journal
June 12 - With editor
July 25 - Under review
August 15 - Under review
October 9 - Major revision
October 25 - With editor
October 26 - Under review
December 18 - Completed and accepted

This is my first SCI paper, and it's possible that my initial idea was not very mature. The process was slow, so if it is necessary for graduation, I do not recommend submitting to this journal. The quality of the journal is still developing, and I hope that the future upgraded version can be included in the Chinese Academy of Sciences' second tier.

1872739125 2021-12-20

Submitted in October, sent for review with the editor 4 days later, received major revisions after about 20 days under review. Five reviewers provided over 20 comments, greatly improving the paper. One month later, the paper was revised and accepted. Thank you for the editor's efficiency, hoping this journal will continue to improve!

爱吃鱼的大脸猫 2021-12-20

Thank you, brother, for your guidance.

vancarry 2021-12-19

This year, there will be the final release of the basic version of the Chinese Academy of Sciences' division. I don't think it will decrease, and it might even have the possibility of increasing, considering its high impact factor of 6.583 and real-time impact factor of 8.5+. Since it is a new publication, the categorization under the upgraded evaluation system might be a bit low, but it will gradually improve over time. This is the first journal in the international field that focuses on energy storage, so we should definitely show it more support!

爱吃鱼的大脸猫 2021-12-19

A paper on thermal energy storage technology was edited and reviewed very quickly. It took about one and a half months for the first round of review, during which the three reviewers raised a total of 16 questions and suggested major revisions. The second round of review took half a month and the paper was accepted directly.

PS: Will the classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) be reduced to three levels in 2021? I feel like the second level may not be maintained. As a novice, I don't understand these things well. Could you please explain it to me, brothers?

achen 2021-12-16

Posted on November 8, 2021, revised on December 11, 2021, and accepted on December 13, 2021. Maybe I am quite lucky, the review process is not as long as mentioned in many comments. My own submission experience was excellent, the reviewers were knowledgeable, communication was smooth, and there were no strange opinions. In recent years, the impact factors of energy storage-related journals have increased rapidly, and this journal still has great development potential, currently ranked as a Q2 journal with an impact factor of 6.

Wxxx159 2021-12-14

It is really too slow...

Wxxx159 2021-12-14

Hello, are you talking about an article related to algorithms or materials?

jcychizhiyiheng 2021-12-14

Submission: 2021.1.21
Feedback: 2021.9.10
Revision: 2021.9.30
Acceptance: 2021.12.02

Yes, it took about a year for this article. There were several changes during the reviewing process. It seems that the reviewer took about a month to complete the review, and the rest of the time was in the hands of the editor. It seems that the editor is really busy.

Wxxx159 2021-12-13

How long did it take for you to submit it? It has been almost two months with the editor now, and there has been no progress yet.

ztyx1015 2021-12-12

"The paper is about computer science."

小白 2021-12-12

Is it a computational article or a materials article?

ztyx1015 2021-12-12

The time for modification was given one month, and it was completed in 21 days.

ztyx1015 2021-12-12

The review comments will be returned after four months.

小白 2021-12-11

How long did it take for you to reply to the editorial comments?

222222aaaaa 2021-12-11

12.1 Under review, 12.9 shows that the review is complete, basically indicating rejection.

ztyx1015 2021-12-11

2021.7 Submission
2021.11 Rework / Major revision
2021.11 Review response
2021.12 Acceptance

Goodenough 2021-11-30

I submitted it in February and the result is still unknown. The editor is biased and unfair, with a preference for publishing papers written by European authors, regardless of their quality.

Wxxx159 2021-11-26

It has been over a month since I became foolish with the editor.

dooho 2021-11-26

Today, I have been working with the editor for two months, and it has been extremely slow.

海的精灵 2021-11-26

It takes two months for review with the editor.

努力chen 2021-11-24

May I ask how you prompted the manuscript? My article has been under review for 7 months now, and a few days ago, I sent a follow-up email to the editor-in-chief through the official website, but I haven't received any response yet.

圆圆圆圆噗 2021-11-24

Just as I finished posting yesterday, things started moving~ Under review on 2021.11.23.

七111 2021-11-23

2021.8.7 Submitted
2021.9.23 Minor Revision
2021.10.17 Rework
2021.11.10 Accepted
2021.11.16 Proof

圆圆圆圆噗 2021-11-23

2021.10.17 Posting
2021.10.23 with editor
It has been a whole month until now... no progress...

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now