王石头 2022-04-24

All the money has been paid...

兰陵笑笑声 2022-04-22

I have withdrawn the manuscript from this trashy journal.

兰陵笑笑声 2022-04-22

This journal is rubbish. They prefer to accept a large number of conference papers instead of regular submissions. The layout is already scheduled until December this year. I have already withdrawn my submission.

GeoCarto 2022-04-21

The speed of reviewing is okay, normal, but several times it was just minor revisions, and I made the changes seriously. In the end, it was inexplicably rejected, which is also frustrating.

xusita 2022-04-20

This journal used to be called Energy Procedia, which specifically collected conference papers. In recent years, due to the increasing popularity of energy, its impact factor has soared. However, in the long run, there is a risk of a sharp decrease in the impact factor or even being removed from SCI.

一剑飘香 2022-04-20

Is it because the journal only has 500 pages per year? I am also planning to submit, can I have your contact information to chat about it?

兰陵笑笑声 2022-04-20

This journal is highly not recommended for submission. I have noticed that the journal's layout is already scheduled until November of this year, which means that the indexing by Wos is at least delayed until after November. As a graduate student, I am eagerly waiting for my paper to be indexed as soon as possible. After summarizing the situation of this journal, I found that it publishes a large number of conference papers, which is an excessive proportion of supplementary issues. It is a waste of space to publish so many supplementary issues. In conclusion, I do not understand the editor-in-chief's approach and it has been a terrible experience submitting to this journal! I hope my fellow graduate students and colleagues stay away from Energy Reports to avoid being disappointed.

一剑飘香 2022-04-06

Excuse me, where can I find the submission template for this journal?

炮 2022-03-28

May I ask, has it been more than twenty days with the editor? Is the speed normal?

王石头 2022-03-26

The editor was very serious. They provided minor revisions and accepted one directly, requested two minor revisions, and it is uncertain if they will be accepted. There were three reviewers, two of whom recommended new literature, but the editor deleted all the recommended literature.

Rangers 2022-03-23

Same status, it has been 10 days since submission to the journal. May I ask if there is any update, OP?

Double Wang 2022-03-22

Yes, the conference is an extra issue, so the chosen option is to directly submit to this journal. The school does not recognize the extra issue.

Double Wang 2022-03-22

Is the content of the article about blockchain + P2P energy trading? I'm not sure if it fits the theme. The template also follows the style of a conference, and it seems to offer good value for money. Here, I hope I can be lucky enough to win!

xiaozhangmim 2022-03-20

Hello, after the submission is completed, it usually takes a few days to be "with editor". You can send an email to inquire about it. The initial process of this publication seems to be a bit slow, possibly due to a large number of submissions.

WangJingjing 2022-03-20

Hello, I would like to inquire about my submission. It has been 10 days and the status is still "Submitted to Journal". I am wondering why there is no submission number yet.

WangJingjing 2022-03-20

Hello, I wanted to ask, it has been 10 days since I submitted my work, but it is still in the "Submitted to Journal" status. Can you please explain what's happening?

xiaozhangmim 2022-03-18

Aug 01, 2021 submitted
Aug 03, 2021 with editor
Aug 27, 2021 under review
Oct 10, 2021 major revision
Jan 15, 2021 minor revision
Feb 20, 2021 minor revision
Mar 17, 2022 accept
Overall, the speed was a bit slow, but there were reasons for requesting an extension for my own modifications. The editor and chief editor were both very diligent and responsible. Although it is OA (Open Access), the review process must meet the requirements of the reviewers, so it is worth submitting if there is no urgency.

寒冷的夏季 2022-03-06

submission: 2021.12.12
need revised: 2022.01.25
revision submit: 2022.02.14
accept: 2022.03.06

zhong 2022-03-03

Hello, may I ask if Energy Reports requires all authors to confirm when submitting, or if confirmation from all authors is only needed after acceptance?

1997 2022-03-02

submission: 20210423
with editor: 20210423-20210505
under review: 20210505……20211011
first review revised-minor: 20211027
revised submission: 20211108
under review: 20211110
Required Reviews Completed: 20211203
second review revised-minor: 20211207
revised submission: 20220110
with editor: 20220111……20220213
Completed - Accept: 20220220
Proofreading: 20220302

DianqiC 2022-02-23

Hello,
I would like to inquire about the user license chosen for publication. The options are CC BY 4.0 and CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. I noticed there is a distinction between commercial and non-commercial use.

我忍着 2022-02-22

Hello, may I ask if the payment notification email is only sent to the corresponding author after the proofreading is completed?

我忍着 2022-02-22

After being employed, the proofreading email will only be sent to the supervisor who is the corresponding author. I would like to ask if the payment should wait for the email notification, or how should it be paid? If it is waiting for the email, will the email only be sent to the corresponding author? (I mainly want to pay by myself, haha)

XIMEN 2022-02-21

Although rejected, the process was relatively fast, so it didn't waste too much time. The review comments were quite detailed, so let's see if we can improve the quality and try submitting to another journal.

嘎嘎嘎子 2022-02-16

Hello, is it true that this can only be released as an open-source version costing $2200+? It feels really expensive, but the impact factor is good...

路人111 2022-02-10

Agreed, please note the official website: www.isees.top

Majid 2022-02-07

Très rapide et agréable journal (French)

Translated: Very quick and nice journal

Tttaaannn 2022-02-01

2021-10-16 submitted
2021-10-21 With Editor
2021-10-22 Under Review
2021-11-16 minor revision
2021-12-03 submission
2021-12-06 Under Review
2022-01-01 minor revision
2022-01-01 submission
2022-01-01 With Editor
2022-01-02 Under Review
2022-01-26 minor revision
2022-01-26 submission
2022-01-26 With Editor
2022-01-29 Under Review
2022-01-31 Accept

Translation:
2021-10-16 submitted
2021-10-21 With Editor
2021-10-22 Under Review
2021-11-16 minor revision
2021-12-03 submission
2021-12-06 Under Review
2022-01-01 minor revision
2022-01-01 submission
2022-01-01 With Editor
2022-01-02 Under Review
2022-01-26 minor revision
2022-01-26 submission
2022-01-26 With Editor
2022-01-29 Under Review
2022-01-31 Accept

Rechard 2022-01-22

Is it open source?

Bolei 2022-01-11

Initial Date Submitted: Oct 08, 2021
Status Date: Dec 15, 2021
Current Status: Completed - Accept
Online: Dec 30, 2021

The reviewer's comments greatly improved the article. It was submitted on Oct 08 and received the first review on Nov 12, which took a little over a month. There were three reviewers, and the authors were given 20 days to make revisions. The second review took about seven working days, and one reviewer pointed out some minor flaws, which were fixed. The third review also took about seven working days. Finally, the article was accepted after the final review.

On Dec 16, it entered the production stage, and the authors were required to provide various statements of rights and financial information. On Dec 30, the final version of the article was published online, completing the process.