慧慧228 2022-08-09

Does this energy report journal charge for regular papers that are submitted? If so, how much is the fee?

李晓东东晓李 2022-08-08

My article was also transferred to this journal (after the reviewers provided their opinions, the editor rejected the manuscript for editing and suggested submitting it to another journal). After submission to this journal, the status changed from "submitted to journal" (around 10 days) to "with editor." After about a day, it directly changed to "decision in process." Does this mean it's not going well?

yyds永远 2022-07-21

Conferences should not be considered as part of the impact factor, as journal articles are not numerous each year.

Cisco Butin 2022-07-20

05 04 submitted to journal
05 09 with editor
05 12 decision in process (formatting issue, journal does not accept double-column layout, editor requests revision and resubmission)
05 13 submitted to journal
05 16 with editor
05 21 under review (provided track link)
06 10 under review (first reviewer completed)
06 13 under review (second reviewer accepted)
06 19 decision in process
06 21 minor revise (two reviewers, 19 comments, no difficult changes, mainly adjusting some formatting and deepening introduction)
07 01 revised submit
07 11 decision in process (second review was very fast, one reviewer only took 1 day)
07 13 accept
07 15 publishing confirmation (filling out financial information and making payment)
In conclusion, I was very lucky and the process was fast, except for the ten days wasted on formatting issues. Currently, the journal is accepting a lot of conference papers, causing a backlog.

dddyyy 2022-07-18

Received at EO 31 MAR 2022: This indicates that the mentioned article was received on March 31, 2022.

Article revised 12 JUN 2022: This means that the article was reviewed and modified on June 12, 2022.

Article accepted 13 JUL 2022: This signifies that the article was approved or accepted on July 13, 2022.

yyds永远 2022-07-09

It uses the template of Evansville, and it has been changed once in the middle.

酸奶11 2022-06-29

Hello, is there any change in your "under review"?

lmxx 2022-06-27

21.12 Submission
22.02 Minor revisions, not many comments given, reviewer asked some questions, resubmit in March
22.04 Another reviewer asked a few questions, further revisions, submit in the same month
22.05 Notice of acceptance

yinxiucheng 2022-06-23

Comrade, are you using the Aisville template?

yyds永远 2022-06-23

Too slow, I submitted it at the beginning of February, but there is still no response from the first review.

游客1 2022-06-13

May I ask how to send an email to the editor? It has been over three months since the first review, but I cannot find the editor's email address.

Alin 2022-06-07

Hello, I have also encountered this situation. Did you come back?

xiaozhu1987 2022-05-24

Submit opinions after 20 days, currently in the process of revision.

yqsl 2022-05-23

Starting from May 18th, the date of "Under Review" has been changing every day, but it has been over a month and no expert has completed the review yet. Have any of you encountered this situation?

炮 2022-05-23

The journal editor is estimated to be seriously ill. I have never seen a journal that disgusts people so much.

Alin 2022-05-22

Brother, how long has it been since you submitted it for review? It has been one month since I submitted my thesis for review, and I still haven't received any updates!

硒都浪子 2022-05-20

It's considered lucky to stay in the hands of an editor for a couple of months.

硒都浪子 2022-05-20

This journal is really too slow. It takes 2 and a half months for the manuscript to be reviewed, and I don't even know when the review comments will come back.

炮 2022-05-20

Normal, this journal will not be handled by the editor for a couple of months.

lee 2022-05-20

Slow is really slow, from the perspective of the quality of review, it should be alright.

炮 2022-05-18

This journal collects a large number of conference papers to make money, and the processing speed of the editors is really slow. After submitting the initial draft for a month, it was still "with editor." After waiting for more than two months, it came back with comments from five reviewers. After making revisions and submitting again, it has been "with editor" for another half a month without any progress. I asked once and was told to wait. I'm thinking of withdrawing the submission. This journal is garbage.

yqsl 2022-05-16

Excuse me, how long does it usually take for the first trial? Is it normal that it has been a month and there is still no feedback?

阿晶 2022-05-12

I previously submitted my paper to ECM and it was transferred to this journal. I didn't know much about this journal, but since it was in the second tier, I agreed to transfer it. The article is about a new approach to thermal performance analysis and experimental verification, which is a small but conventional innovation. The process was very fast, submitted on March 4th, with editor on March 7th, under review on March 8th, received minor revisions on March 24th, and after making the revisions, it was uploaded on April 10th, and the tracking system was initiated. One of the reviewers completed the second round of review, but the other one never responded until April 29th when it became "with editor". Then the editor found another reviewer, and on May 10th, it was accepted. The entire review process was very efficient, possibly due to the recommended reviewers. However, after looking at previous papers in this journal, I found that there are a lot of conference papers and their quality is not on the same level as regular research papers that are actually published (the difference between ordinary EI and SCI second-tier papers may be even greater). The acceptance rate displayed in the system probably includes those low-quality conference papers. I hope that in the future, the journal can focus less on making money from conferences and instead consider the many good regular papers. However, for now, being in the second tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, it is still worth submitting some theoretical and analytical papers. Overall, the speed advantage is significant, but the quality of the accepted conference papers is really not up to par.

muke 2022-05-11

Submitted at the end of October in the 21st year. After about two months, the status remained unchanged and I sent an email to urge the progress. Then it went through the editorial process. Received feedback on January 20th and took more than half a month to make revisions. The second round of review was completed in March and returned in late March. Accepted in early April.

No one 2022-05-10

I am also like this. May I ask what happened later and how long did it take to work with the editor and submit it for review?

xusita 2022-05-08

Translate the following text into English: "A coupon is available for a 30% discount on the publication fee of an energy report. It can also be used for other open-access journals. Please contact us if interested."

leehong 2022-05-07

The journal is rubbish, although it has been accepted, but the process is too slow, and the editor is very picky.

一剑飘香 2022-04-25

Excuse me, is this journal fast online?

xbzhou 2022-04-24

I submitted a paper on numerical simulation, and the review process was fast. The first review took 15 days, and the second review took about a week. However, the editorial process was slow. The manuscript stayed with the editor for a long time, and the whole process took nearly 3 months. There were four reviewers, two of whom provided professional opinions, while the other two had less expertise and the editor only requested minor revisions. The publication fee was 14,000 RMB, which is considered cheap for an Open Access journal. Although the impact factor for the year 2021 is lower at around 4.87 compared to 6.87 in 2020, considering the popularity of the energy field, journals with "Energy" in their name tend to have increasing impact factors. Therefore, the future impact factor of this journal should not be too low. I suggest that everyone should try submitting their not-so-good papers to Open Access journals, as they are relatively easy to get published in and it still counts as SCI second quartile.

一剑飘香 2022-04-24

Can you share the speed of the reviewer, OP?