人生在于飞跃 2022-01-06

This journal is still very responsible. We submitted a paper last year around June, and it went under review until the end of September. It seems that there were either significant conflicts in the reviewer comments or the chosen reviewers were unwilling to contribute. In the end, we received three opinions, two suggesting revisions (without specifying whether they were major or minor), and one stating that the work is good but not suitable for this journal, without providing specific suggestions.

Fight领域顶刊 2021-12-18

Already rejected, five reviewers, four revisions, one rejection. The editor rejected me... I feel so helpless.

之江er 2021-12-17

The result will be available soon. Congratulations in advance! How long has it been under review since you submitted it?

Fight领域顶刊 2021-12-16

Now that the Required Reviews have been completed, we should be waiting for the reviewer's information.

之江er 2021-12-16

12.16 Still under review, it has been nearly three months. Have you received any updates on yours?

Fight领域顶刊 2021-12-12

Is there still no response now? It feels like the review process is a bit slow! It has been under review all along.

之江er 2021-11-30

Currently still under review, there is still no news.

科研民工 2021-11-28

20210519-Submitted to Journal
20210608-Under Review
20210707-Revise
There were four reviewers, and the editor also provided suggestions. There were many areas that needed to be revised, but only 20 days were given. After considering the feedback, it was decided to make comprehensive revisions and request an extension until September 28th.

20210924-Revision Submitted to Journal
20210926-Under Review
20211022-Revise
The editor and the other three reviewers have no major issues. They mentioned that the language needs some polishing and provided 14 more suggestions, mostly correcting my mistakes. There aren't many changes needed in the main text.

2021030-Revision Submitted to Journal
20211031-Under Review
20211101-Accept
Apart from the time spent on revisions, the handling speed of the manuscript has been quite fast. I am grateful to the editor and the reviewers for their significant help. The journal is also highly regarded in the field of additive manufacturing and is worth submitting to.

Fight领域顶刊 2021-11-27

Brother, how long does it take for your paper to receive approval? Mine is still under review.

之江er 2021-10-25

Submission process: 9.23 submit
9.24 with editor
10.9 under review
10.23 under review, not sure if it was resubmitted after time change
To be continued
Looking forward to a good outcome

Seamily 2021-10-20

7.7 Submission
8.13 Review
9.15 Minor repair
10.11 Minor repair
10.15 Acceptance

会飞的辰鱼 2021-10-07

2021.07.18 With Journal
2021.07.25 With Editor
2021.08.14 Under Review
2021.08.22 Required Reviews Completed
2021.09.10 Revisions
2021.09.20 Revisions Submitted to the Journal
2021.09.27 Under Review
2021.09.30 Required Reviews Completed
2021.10.06 Accepted

After two and a half months, I finally received acceptance. Both the editor and the reviewers were very responsible. I am very grateful for their suggestions, which were very fair. They seemed to value the language style of the manuscript. There were three reviewers, two of whom mentioned that my language was beautiful and provided feedback on some minor details. The other reviewer's comments were more targeted, and I anticipated that they would raise that specific issue. Overall, the Additive Manufacturing journal is worth submitting to. For those submitting, remember to polish and revise the writing. I hope everyone's submission goes smoothly, and the journal continues to improve, with its impact factor rising!

billions1943 2021-10-06

Commenting on it, a professor from Beijing University is one of the editorial board members of this journal, and all of his students studying for their PhDs abroad have submitted their dissertations to this journal, indicating a close relationship. However, the dissertations only cover half of the topic, with insufficient theoretical content.

Lininininininin 2021-09-30

About one or two weeks.

David0910 2021-09-19

How long have you been with the editor?

Liclin 2021-09-18

Is this journal particularly demanding in terms of language? Or is it assumed that editing services are required? Additive manufacturing leans towards computational geometry, but it was rejected twice directly by the editor, stating that language needs to be standardized and polished. They didn't even give a chance for an under review.

wang1325 2021-09-11

Very good journal, I don't know why it was downgraded to Zone 2 in the 2020 upgraded version. I hope it can return to Zone 1! The editor is very responsible and the processing speed is fast. It took exactly three months from submission to online publication, but the "with editor" time was a bit long, which made people worry. Now it seems that the editor was just recruiting the most suitable reviewers. The reviewers raised very professional and strict questions. They provided more than 20 questions in total, but after responding seriously, the paper was accepted directly. As an ordinary teacher from a non-double-first-class university in the western region, I didn't feel discriminated against.

c101821 2021-08-20

How long does everyone stay with the editor?
How long does it take to submit for review afterwards?
How long does it take for the review comments to be returned?
How long does it take from submission to acceptance?
I submitted 2 articles. The first article was with the editor 2 weeks after submission, and it was sent for review after about 3 days. It has been a month since the review, and I don't know when the comments will be returned.
The second article was submitted on August 4th and was with the editor on August 14th. It has been a week now and it has not been sent for review yet.

tsy 2021-07-23

5.14 Submit magazine
5.29 with editor
The status during this period has always been "with editor."
7.22 Rejected due to language reasons and stated that currently only manuscripts requested by reviewers are being considered.
In one word: absolute!

岳成斌 2021-06-27

Very good journal, the reviewers are very responsible and professional, and the comments and suggestions they provide are very valuable. The review process is also very fast.

markdeng 2021-06-21

This journal heavily relies on connections. American students can easily get published by just sprinkling some powder. Let me talk about my article. After being rejected by ACTA, I submitted it here. It took 8 months in total, going through three rounds of revisions.
First round: Three reviewers, one agreed to accept it directly, one asked for minor English language revisions, and the third raised two small issues. After the revisions, I thought it would be accepted, but the editor assigned two new reviewers.
Second round: Two reviewers, one recommended accepting it after grammar revisions, and the other raised many technical questions, indicating their interest in knowing more about the manufacturing details. After the revisions, it was sent back for review. After one month of being "under review," it showed "required reviews completed." However, the editor did not provide me with the feedback from these two reviewers. They kept finding new reviewers, and the "under review" status changed three times. It took four months before the second review, and in the end, only one reviewer's opinion was given to me. This reviewer was not even in my field and provided a bunch of random suggestions, leading to my rejection by the editor.
All I can say is, be cautious. This journal has low publication volume and a bunch of well-connected individuals occupying the spots.

MichaelAIRJordan 2021-06-15

Mainly focusing on innovation in additive strategies, not the type of journals that rely on superficial representation (High Entropy SLM will expose their true nature).

秦时明月 2021-04-30

If the revision is accepted, the journal will proceed with the review process without any major issues. Generally, three reviewers will be assigned, and if one of them provides negative feedback, the submission will be rejected directly. The journal's impact factor has already exceeded 10 in 2020, so it is worth submitting.

lythu 2021-04-29

Three months were given for major repairs, all of which were minor issues. I hope that once they are fixed, they can be accepted.

Fanatica 2021-04-21

Submitted on March 3rd
Under review as of March 31st

buaa刘炳森 2021-04-12

It has been 10 days and it has not been submitted for review yet.

ZJ_KUL 2021-04-02

2020-11-07 with journal
2020-11-23 with editor
2020-12-14 under review
2021-02-26 required reviews completed
2021-03-30 reject

The quality of reviewers varies, with some being responsible and others clearly slacking off.

ZJ_KUL 2021-04-02

Indeed. Submitted to with editor, two weeks. With editor to under review, three weeks. Required review completed, no result for a month. Sent an email to inquire about the progress, and the next day received a direct rejection letter.

ZJ_KUL 2021-04-02

Indeed. Submitted to with editor, two weeks. With editor to under review, three weeks. Required review completed, no result for a month. Sent an email to inquire about the progress, and the next day received a direct rejection letter.

FYXZ 2021-03-28

15 days after submission, it became "with editor". Currently, it has been "with editor" for one week.