王东 2022-03-22

In the submission system, there is an option to download templates in the draft submission column.

SpringXuu 2022-03-18

The LaTeX template I downloaded cannot be used.

SpringXuu 2022-03-18

May I ask if you have a LaTeX template for electronics? Could you please send me a copy? The one I downloaded from the official website is not working.

wulllaalaldlfjsal 2022-02-23

February 23, 2022, paper accepted.

wulllaalaldlfjsal 2022-02-21

Posted on December 31, 2021.
On January 26, 2022, five reviewers made major revisions. Two of them were only about formatting issues, while the other three provided over 20 comments.
Revised version was resubmitted on February 4, 2022.
On February 12, pending decision. Only one reviewer's comments were received in the second round, suggesting checking the English.
Pending editor decision continued until now, February 14.
It has been almost two months since submission, hoping for acceptance.

Yep111 2022-02-10

Hello, I also want to contribute to this. I've been having issues running the LaTeX template I downloaded today. Have you encountered any problems? Please help! Can you share your experience?

Yep111 2022-02-10

Hello, I also want to submit this. I have been having problems running the LaTeX template that I downloaded today. Have you encountered any? Please help!

henry34 2022-02-05

The editing process was fast, and the expert review was also fast. The submission was made on January 7, 2022, and the review comments were received on January 29. The revisions were minor, and there were three expert reviewers, two of whom had fewer questions, while one had more questions. However, all the questions were beneficial for improving the quality of the article. After making all the necessary modifications and replying, the acceptance notice was received on February 5. Overall, the experience was very good.

Wzzzz1991 2022-01-24

I have submitted two articles, one accepted in 30 days and another accepted in 35 days. The reviewers are strict or lenient, but overall it is fine. As long as the major revisions are made according to the reviewers' comments, there is a good chance of being accepted.

lili527 2021-11-29

I find it very funny. Is this journal very powerful? I submitted on November 24th, and the next day it was rejected without any response or explanation in the email. I thought something was wrong, so I submitted again and asked in the email. Then they replied to my email for the second time and said that it couldn't be reviewed due to the novelty of the subject and other reasons. Well, I previously submitted this paper to other SCI journals and they were directly reviewed. I originally wanted to submit to this journal for a quicker process.

小学肾 2021-09-17

Master's First Thesis
Submission Date: 2021.07.22
First Review Returned: 2021.09.02
Accepted: 2021.07.16
The first day after submission, the editor asked me to submit the graphical abstract within 3 days. Four reviewers were assigned for the first review, and they raised 20 questions. Among them, two reviewers' opinions were difficult to handle, while the other two reviewers only raised one or two questions, giving me 7 days to respond. Interestingly, when I received the email with the first review results, the deadline was stated as September 9th, but on September 6th, I received another email stating that I must submit it by September 7th. I tried to negotiate with the editor for an extra day, but on September 7th, the editor still asked me to submit it that day. Overall, the experience was not too smooth, but it was manageable.

wsnxj 2021-08-18

Is there a website for submissions?

Prophet 2021-07-26

Received: 2021.2.19
Major revision: 2021.3.30
Minor revisions: 2021.4.14
Accepted: 2021.4.22
Three reviewers, two suggested direct publication, one reviewer provided some comments, quite professional, and suggested adding experiments. It's good to practice during the master's period, and progress was made quickly.

Bob 2021-07-16

Posted on July 5th, received the review reply on July 15th, and returned the revised manuscript within 10 days, along with a response to the review comments.
There were two reviewers, and their comments were very insightful. One of the reviewers mentioned that the innovation point was not prominent and provided feedback on the key points in my paper, indirectly helping me discover the innovative aspects that should be emphasized.
I hope that the publication process will go smoothly after the revision.

gamesgenesis 2021-06-23

Translation: The speed is fast, the quality is okay, it is quite good for practice.

shuaishuaideliangzai 2021-06-04

May I ask how much is the layout fee? I would like to invest in it in the near future.

shuaishuaideliangzai 2021-06-04

May I ask how much is the layout fee? I am planning to invest in the near future.

budding 2021-03-12

May I ask what is the title of the paper you sent?

bruno686 2021-03-10

May I ask where is the manuscript you submitted now?

EricZhou 2021-02-09

received: 2020.12.29
major revision: 2021.1.26
revised version received: 2021.2.1
minor revision: 2021.2.5
revised version received: 2021.2.7
accepted for publication: 2021.2.9
Overall, the process was very fast. When I emailed the assistant editor, they responded quickly. Maybe I was lucky because I was assigned two good reviewers who asked professional questions. After following their advice and making the necessary changes, I truly felt that the paper became more logical and well-supported.

puqing 2021-02-08

May I ask which journal you are referring to for submission?

大小校 2021-02-01

To be honest, this journal is quite unreliable. The review process is fast, but the quality of the reviews from the three reviewers is extremely low! One reviewer's English grammar is completely wrong, making it impossible to understand, and another reviewer doesn't understand at all, asking many worthless questions. It is said that this journal is a predatory one, so be cautious! PS: It's okay to get rejected, but the crucial point is that such review comments seriously affected my confidence. Later, I submitted to another journal, and the review comments were very helpful. The paper has been published in another journal.

吃瓜不嫌事大 2021-01-21

1. MDPI
2. 40 self-citation rate + 10,000 RMB + 2 weeks for manuscript review
3. Journal warning blacklist
Understand what I mean, right? Don't submit if not related to graduation! It's really helpless, sigh!

甘棠 2021-01-19

Three days were rejected by the editor and not sent for review. Beijing editorial department.