Verified Reviews - Electronics
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

WHX_WHX 2023-04-17

Currently, I have also received the payment confirmation email. I would like to ask you, which payment method should I choose for school? I'm not quite sure as this is my first time dealing with it.

JohnYoung 2023-04-17

03-10 pending review
03-14 under review
04-12 major revision - all three reviewers gave positive and constructive feedback
04-14 revised version received (basically means the revised manuscript has been submitted, not sure if the status name is correct)
04-15 pending editor decision
04-16 paper accepted
04-17 payment made, received payment confirmation email

wangting 2023-04-11

I thought it would be quick too, but it's been over a month and a half for you as well. This situation is very urgent.

2023-04-11

May I ask which expert knows the required repetition rate for this journal?

pp好久不见 2023-04-10

I've been looking at the comments and noticed that it took a short time for the journal to accept submissions. However, it has been two months since the first review without any news. I have sent two reminders during this time, and the editor has responded, but why is the review process so slow?! Does this mean my submission has been rejected...

顺利毕业球球了 2023-04-08

Rejected after three days of submission, rejected by the editor. I don't quite understand.

我要发sci!! 2023-04-04

Do not publicly disclose the reviewer's comments. At that time, I clicked on it and asked the editor to contact me afterwards to explain this matter.

WHX_WHX 2023-03-29

May I ask what forms of payment are accepted?

WHX_WHX 2023-03-28

May I ask, when submitting, should we choose open peer review or not?

俊俊菜鸟 2023-03-28

The speed is really fast. We have been receiving review comments even on weekends, thinking that people in foreign countries don't work on weekends. It took exactly one month from submission to acceptance. There were two major revisions and one minor revision.

han 2023-03-27

Submitted, rejected within three days, don't know the reason for the rejection.

ZZT123 2023-03-16

Hello, how long will this Pending Review take?

heijiaz 2023-03-15

Does this journal require payment?

asjiodjosijofs 2023-03-01

The reviewing process was fast, it took about two weeks for the manuscript to be returned. There were minor revisions suggested, with approximately 20 comments provided by two reviewers. One reviewer had no suggestions and recommended acceptance directly.

The revision comments were returned in one day (usually, minor revisions require completion within five days). An additional author was added, initially not allowed, but after contacting the assistant editor and discussing it for a while, the addition was permitted.

The manuscript was submitted on February 8th, and the acceptance notification was received on March 1st.

gzghzh 2023-02-25

Submitted on January 21
Accepted on February 25
The opinions of the three reviewers in between were all positive
Accepted after major revisions one week later

linmd1989 2023-02-15

If the article has a large number of negative opinions as stated by the editor, the editor reluctantly helps the author polish it into a positive opinion to estimate the author's fragile heart. In theory, when this Scopus journal comes to the door, I should have to review your article again, go through a series of reviews, and then pay 1000 CHF for publication.

Surprisingly, none of this is needed, and the article is directly accepted without any publication fees. This obviously means that the journal intentionally accepts articles that can enhance the influence and citations of this Scopus journal, diverting a part that meets their magazine's SCI standards (or needs major revisions), using the bait of waiving publication fees to see if they can catch some suitable articles.

Although this article is purely written to meet the temporary requirements of the project, it has also allowed me to see the sneaky operations of MDPI and learn a lot about the dark side of publishing houses.

linmd1989 2023-02-15

Not only that, but within twenty minutes of being rejected, a MDPI Scopus journal directly sent it to you and accepted it for publication, without any publication fee. I have checked this Scopus journal before, and it normally charges 1000 CHF, without any free offer. Thank you for your support of MDPI, /XXXXX/ is willing to accept your manuscript and can publish your manuscript free of charge.

linmd1989 2023-02-15

I received comments from three reviewers, all of which suggested making modifications. However, unexpectedly, I received a rejection decision and when I asked the editor about the reason for rejection, they gave me the following absurd excuses:

"There are other comments that the reviewers submitted for only Editors to see. Although the comments to you could see were packaged positively for reconsideration, their overall score was a reject with no resubmission."

I am just curious, if all the comments are being polished as the editor claims, wouldn't the response letter become a disaster if significant revisions are actually made? How can we address each point effectively?

bifenggang 2023-02-13

Experience of submission:
20230113 Submitted the manuscript
20230201 Received the review comments
20230208 Revised the manuscript and resubmitted
20230213 Accepted for publication
The process was very fast, taking only one month from submission to acceptance.

hocking 2023-02-10

2023-2-10 Submission, Pending review
2023-2-12 Reject by Editor.

We are writing to inform you that we will not be able to process your submission further. Submissions sent for peer-review are selected based on discipline, novelty, and general significance, along with the usual criteria for publication in scholarly journals. Therefore, our decision does not necessarily reflect the quality of your work.
If you decide to submit it elsewhere, we wish you the best of luck.

arr2 2023-02-04

Received email:
2023-01-04 Submission Received
2023-01-05 Assistant Editor Assigned
2023-01-10 Authorship Statement Form
2023-01-23 Major Revisions (Deadline: 30 January 2023)
2023-01-26 Revised Version Received
2023-01-31 Accepted for Publication
2023-01-31 Payment Confirmation
2023-02-01 Final Proofreading Before Publication
2023-02-02 Manuscript Resubmitted
2023-02-02 Paper has been published.
The speed is extremely fast; however, during the major revisions period, an additional fee was paid to the publishing house for proofreading (protection fee), even though it had already been done.
The proofreading didn't have much content and there were some errors in the proofreading; fortunately, after it was done, there was no further discussion and it was directly accepted.
Originally, there was a discount from IOAP, but now it has all been withdrawn.

zt1998 2023-01-26

11.23 Submission
11.24 Under review
1.18 Major revision
1.23 Revised manuscript received
1.25 Paper accepted
1.26 English proofreading completed

The review speed is quite fast, with three reviewers in the first round.
The first reviewer gave 2 "can be" and 4 "yes," and provided 4 comments.
The second reviewer gave 1 "yes," 4 "can be," and 1 "must be," and provided 7 comments.
The third reviewer only gave "yes" and provided 5 comments.
Overall, the modifications were not difficult, and after one day, an email was received stating that it was accepted. Those who are eager to publish their paper can give it a try!

LittlePhoenix 2023-01-23

May I ask how to pay the layout fee of 2000 CHF (Swiss Francs) for this journal? Are there any credit cards that can be used to pay in Swiss Francs?

howie96 2023-01-22

2022-11-15 Submission
2022-11-16 Under review
2022-12-1 Minor revisions
2022-12-9 Revised version received
2022-12-11 Minor revisions (Editor's comments)
2022-12-13 Revised version received
2022-12-16 Pending editor decision
2022-12-21 Accept
Very fast speed!!!

自动化 2023-01-19

Translate into English: Journal APC: 2000 CHF.

English Translation: Journal APC: 2000 CHF.

sdfsdfdfsdfs 2023-01-16

May I ask how much does the layout fee for this journal cost?

午离 2023-01-11

2022-11-23 Submission
2022-11-24 Under review
2022-12-31 Major revisions
2023-1-7 Revised version received
2022-1-8 Pending editor decision
2022-1-9 Accepted
Very fast, but unfortunately, the WOS partition is only Q3. I don't know if there is hope to move up to Q2 next year. I really hope to be in Q2.

hocking 2023-01-05

Answer the question "似一": Reply to the assistant editor's email saying "confirm it is correct."

leicaiyan123 2022-12-30

Received Date
November 17, 2022
Revised Date
December 8, 2022
Accepted Date
December 12, 2022

Soon, it was warned.

似— 2022-12-29

Hello, sorry to bother you. I would like to ask, after submitting my contribution, I received an email from an editor asking to confirm the APC. Do I need to reply or provide an operation code? When I clicked on the link in the email, it took me to the manuscript details page, but there was no clickable confirmation area. I also submitted my contribution on November 29th, and it is still "under review". I am worried if I missed something.

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now